16 ms·
The state of open source AI
- hughw 2mo agoIs the CTO a bot?
- paulddraper 2mo ago> Open weights are no longer a compromise. They are where the work happens. > They require owning the layers above it — the harness, the memory, the permission model — while those layers are still open. > Open isn't a vendor choice. It's a sovereignty choice.
- lostmsu 2mo agoCan a vending machine operator do better than Mozilla management? - that's the golden question.
- hypfer 2mo agoThis new trend of content appearing while scrolling down is so terrible accessibility-wise, I do not understand how Mozilla of all institutions would do it. Not every trend needs to be followed. Have some backbone. You receive donations to have that. ___ Apart from the website being - frankly - bullshit, the content is also - frankly - bullshit. It's just on the frontpage because the title says "open source AI".
- azangru 2mo ago> This new trend of content appearing while scrolling down is so terrible accessibility-wise, I do not understand how Mozilla of all institutions would do it. Could you explain what is wrong with the accessibility of this page? All the content is included in the html payload, so it is accessible to screen readers and text-based browsers; and as for the "reveal" effect, it seems to respect user's choice of "prefers reduced motion" and is disabled when that is user's preference.
- hypfer 2mo ago> it seems to respect user's choice of "prefers reduced motion". Cool, that I didn't check, because it is impossible to enable that setting, as it breaks _huge_ amounts of websites. I'm not aware of a way to enable it selectively, but one could also just display the content at all times. It's a static page. It's static content. None of this makes any sense. ___ The idea behind that style of gradual reveal is probably some kind of storytelling, but the only story it tells is that mozilla is wasting donations on people with incorrect opinions that could be used on.. idk not building torment nexii?
- Cuuugi 2mo agoMaybe its the wildfire smoke in my eyes, but that font choice feels aggressive.
- aprilthird2021 2mo agoIt's AI slop
- input_sh 2mo agoIt's their own fonts: Mozilla Headline and Mozilla Text. No idea why they'd be using the display font for the abstract though, that kind of defeats the whole purpose. It's supposed to be quirky and bold, but used far more sparsingly.
- hungryhobbit 2mo agoForget aggressive, I just find the main text font harder to read (vs. ... you know ... a normal font).
- marcuskaz 2mo agoIt appears open models were used to create this slop. That opening is so hard to understand what they are trying to say, from the font and how it's written. It took me several times rereading to even grasp. Plus the article is filled with cryptic things like: Open ships easy. Open deploys hard. What?! Is it a meta answer to "the state of open source AI" question?
- azangru 2mo agoFrom the title of a chart: > The venture-funded open-source ecosystem: total disclosed funding, USD M > Bars grow as you scroll. The bars, in fact, don't grow as you scroll. And I don't even see why they should.
- yjftsjthsd-h 2mo ago> The bars, in fact, don't grow as you scroll. And I don't even see why they should. On my device, they grow as I scroll to them.
- gen2brain 2mo agoOn my device, bars grow as I scroll. I want your feature, being able to just scroll the static page without elements jumping around.
- garretraziel 2mo agoI think it’s supposed to mean “open source is easily shipped, but open source is hard to deploy”? Or perhaps “deploys hard” is a figure of speach, as in “we are deploying this open source and we are deploying it /hard/“? I don’t know, it’s not good.
- hughw 2mo agoSo good at style, so weak on substance
- sippeangelo 2mo agoThis is truly some proper slop. The "PRODUCTION RATE BY COMPANY SIZE" graph has bars that start offset from the text underneath them, which LOOKS like a mistake that happened due to word wrap, but if you visibly compare the 54% to the 55% bars they seem to have compensated for this?! I can't tell if his was on purpose or accident and it's impossible to take the data seriously! This is on mobile in portrait. In landscape the text doesn't wrap or offset anything.
- babblingfish 2mo agoSpeculation: open models is what will kill Anthropic and OpenAI. Hyperscalers can run the models without a licensing fee. Apple can make them smaller and put them on the device. The frontier models are an edge and a liability. They're astronomically expensive to train. Without them, their models will fade into obscurity. Their marketing depends on people believing the models are meaningfully different, as people have sweatily argued on this forum. Personally, I'm not convinced there's much of a difference between these models at this point. The harness is what takes these random and hallucinogenic models and make them into something deterministic and useful.
- qudat 2mo agoThere’s not much of a difference because open models are distilling from frontier models. If frontier models cease to exist then many of these open models will as well
- cma 2mo agoYou can run the same harness on fable, opus, sonnet, and see a huge difference between them. It is true the harness is important, and openai has begun encryption its instructions to swarmed sub-agents instead of just encrypting the chain of thought, but the model is still important at this stage.
- Alpha3031 2mo agoReferent of "the models are meaningfully different" reads as <top closed, top open> rather than <top closed, cheaper closed> to me, so I'm not sure why we'd be comparing Fable vs Opus/Sonnet or Sol vs Terra rather than the same against Kimi K3.
- jdw64 2mo agoThe UI is really hard on the eyes. Personally, I think the font size is way too big, and the animation timing feels off. If this is a benchmark page and not a product page, I feel like the information should be scannable at a glance. The UX is bad.
- farmerbb 2mo agoFeels like a mobile website that was never optimized for desktop usage.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- 100percentjake 2mo agoI'm unsure what it is about AI developers seemingly not having eyeballs. The Hermes Agent website is absolutely eye-searing and the application itself resembles some sort of weird "RETVRN" greek-styled travel agent website. https://hermes-agent.nousresearch.com/ https://hermes-agent.nousresearch.com/
- jdw64 2mo agoI agree 1000%, Mr. Jake.
- urbsgpw 2mo agoI use hermes only ever saw their repo. Atrocious. I was sure you were exaggerating.
- Jtarii 2mo agoReally wish websites weren't allowed to force smooth scroll on. Hijacking basic browser functionality is so hostile.
- fwip 2mo agoOh that's easy: they outsource design to the LLM, which doesn't have eyeballs.
- positron26 2mo agoJust like how the web was won? I think Mozilla is chasing a past formula, but the projection isn't linear enough to remain consistent, and the critical parts of the outcome, utter centralization of the market dominance of the three C's, are left out of the equation. We might get the consolation prize, a few nerds having competitive alternatives to applaud, but we will be left with the hidden costs: stagnation by bloated market leaders, consumers and businesses pouring trillions of dollars into the commercial offerings while open development wonders where money comes from, and the leakage of these imbalances into political and social spheres. If we follow a Mozilla template and get to the peak of Mozilla's success at the web, look at what that really is. Facebook, Amazon, Google etc are orthogonal to that equation.
- amanharshx 2mo agoThe design and layout made it harder to read than it needed to be. Regardless, the inference costs dropping almost 50× is really amazing to see. And now Kimi K3 release has shown how open models are getting closer to the frontier level already. Open source AI is moving a lot faster than Anthropic and OpenAI would have expected lol.
- latexr 2mo agoQuick fix for the font, which many people are (rightly) complaining about. Array.from(document.getElementsByClassName("quote")).forEach(p => { p.style.marginTop = "20px"; p.classList.remove("quote", "reveal") }) The issue is that all of the text is a quote, and that renders enormous. That’s probably fine for a tiny quote amongst more text, but here it is jarring.
- silverlimetea 2mo agoquerySelectorAll('.quote')
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- Cyberdog 2mo agoquerySelector/querySelectorAll() are great for plucking out deeply nested elements but if all you need is to find all elements of a certain class and the API gives you a tool to do exactly that, why not do that instead of reaching for the general-purpose Swiss army knife? Sure, the execution speed difference may be only measurable in microseconds, but it takes about the same amount of time to type so why not use the specific tool?
- silverlimetea 2mo agoThis is the specific tool. Wrapping it in Array.from is the extra step. The Array-like already works for forEach and for .. of
- brunooliv 2mo agoThis is really insane to me. There's nothing practical about open-source models yet that makes them even remotely comparable to closed frontier models. All the hype around GLM, Qwen, now Kimi.... Are people really this naive that they believe these reports or, more worringly, are people NOT using these models and seeing the HUGE gap that still exists? Take a task, any medium-sized task, decently scoped that you'd trust to give to Sonnet to finish without a hitch. Now give it to ANY open-source frontier model and watch them struggle and go in circles while failing tool calls and randomly assuming things. Open-source is and has been amazing but its so hard to deploy reliably and at scale and there's still big problems in the underlying models with instruction following and tool calling that makes it basically unusable for production workloads at a decent price point...
- foolswisdom 2mo ago> Take a task, any medium-sized task, decently scoped that you'd trust to give to Sonnet to finish without a hitch. Now give it to ANY open-source frontier model and watch them struggle and go in circles while failing tool calls and randomly assuming things. Claude used to be much worse than it is now, just as bad the open weights models are. And the open weights were worse. The labs will also try to keep the lead, but at some point people start seeing real value from open models. Maybe you say they're not ready yet for medium tasks, but everyone sees the writing on the wall.
- brunooliv 2mo agoI hope you're right and I want you to be right, but, even seeing the current hype around local models, etc... and open-source models, I think the industry is currently under a big confusion where they see the benchmarks of things like Kimi, GLM, Qwen, they play with it via opencode, and they think like: "Wow this is pretty good, I want to deploy this". But they don't understand how the KV cache grows over time and can take almost as much memory as needed for a 30B param model, they dont understand that a quantized model WILL NOT be the same as a full precision one, and they surely don't see the engineering work needed to serve inference to even tens of customers at a decent quality and latency level. The biggest moat of these giant labs and models is increasingly shifting towards deployment capabilities and (debatably) having better (proprietary) harnesses. The models themselves can be impressive on benchmarks, but unless they can be served reliably to customers either at scale, hosted somewhere, or even on edge with predictable latency and memory usage, then frontier will always be leading.
- fan__glm52 2mo agohttps://stateofopensource.ai/state-of-open-source-ai-2026.pdf https://stateofopensource.ai/state-of-open-source-ai-2026.pd... the pdf is easier to read
- progx 2mo ago"Open won"... to be fair cause "google paid it".
- jdw64 2mo agoI think the fact that Mozilla survival model ultimately depends on Google's money means Google is keeping a corpse propped up just to have a defense argument that a browser competitor still exists, so they don't get hit with monopoly regulations.
- victor9000 2mo agoParticularly in this day in age when the FF market share is down to low single digits
- dosinga 2mo ago> Mozilla exists because one company tried to own the front door to the web, and an open community rose up to make sure it never could. I'd say that the front door to the web is pretty much owned by Google and Apple at this point given Firefox current marketshare. And maybe that's enough, maybe a future where a low percentage of open models keep the rest of the system honest but that doesn't seem the argument of this article
- bel8 2mo agoMozilla exists because Google gives them billions to keep Google as default search engine.
- ifdefdebug 2mo agoAnd to keep around a concurrent browser with full adblock abilities so they can cripple their own without too much of an outcry.
- jjordan 2mo agoDo you think Firefox development is unsustainable without this substantial stipend?
- mossTechnician 2mo agoAt their current trajectory, absolutely. But if they focused their development efforts, cut down on careless spending especially to third parties, and looked for alternative sources of funding (it is presently not possible for users to donate to Firefox development, for example), I feel like they could survive without Google for at least a little while. Frankly, I think these things should be started on now, while they still have Google's backing.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- wongarsu 2mo agoIt's also just a very cherry-picked framing Mozilla exists because one company owned the front door to the web, and another company abused their market position to push their free (as in beer) browser. Mozilla is the phoenix rising from the ashes of that first company. Then another company came along, abused their market position to push their free browser, demolished Firefox's market share but keep handing them cash to avoid the appearance of a monopoly
- bityard 2mo agoIt sure is nice to see that Mozilla is still doing all that they can to keep on top of current trends, except developing a decent privacy-focused web browser for developers and power users.
- longitudinal93 2mo agoBut they supply all the source for those projects to flourish and have an ecosystem of their own: Librefox, Iceweasel, Reynard, etc, etc.
- doodlesdev 2mo agoThat's a very low bar, though. Chromium is open-source too and has a bunch of privacy-focused forks such as Ungoogled Chromium, Brave and Chromite.
- mtone 2mo agoFirefox's AI Chatbot feature only proposes one open model provider (Mistral) and zero local option. They're not walking the talk.
- Cyberdog 2mo agoYes, Firefox itself is a “general purpose” browser, and that’s probably for the best in terms of wide market appeal. Other developers have taken the engine and made power-user-focused browsers with it. Lately I’ve fallen in love with Zen (though after 2 months of use its pinned tabs features still confuse me a bit). https://zen-browser.app/ https://zen-browser.app/
- slig 2mo agoThey get paid half a billion a year to do exactly what they have been doing and keeping FF at <5% of market share on desktop and 0% on mobile.
- 40four 2mo agoI’ve been using Firefox on mobile (and desktop) for years. I still don’t understand all the hate thrown at them. Whatever the downsides/ shortcomings people see, they are irrelevant to me, because I hate Google more & refuse to give them my data. They are good browsers & work just a well as Chrome 99.9% of the time for me
- urbsgpw 2mo agoHaven't been following the articles and snippets we get from these labs about training their models for a while. But I'm guessing the latest chinese models are way less based on distilling? If not, then your speed of progress is still limited by the two labs (which we are collectively, in various forms subsidizing).
- GodelNumbering 2mo agoExactly 4 months ago, the marketshare on openrouter was 60%-40% in favor of closed models. Now it's 63%-37% in favor of open models. On March 19th, the open models processed 888B tokens in aggregate, yesterday, they processed 4.19T tokens in aggregate. That's almost 5x in 4 months! I can't think of the right intensifier to describe this level of growth. If you are looking for more details (as inferred by openrouter data), I built a dashboard that updates daily: https://dirac.run/labs-market-share https://dirac.run/labs-market-share
- ofjcihen 2mo agoThis right here is going to be considered one of the first major signs of the downfall of closed models years from now. And look, if you disagree with me PLEASE tell me why. What moat do these companies have? I genuinely want to know because looking at the spend for companies like OAI and Anthropic with no actual moat I can identify is actually driving me insane.
- athorax 2mo agoThe moat is enterprise contracts and artificial friction moving between harnesses. Moat is a strong word, more of a puddle.
- hungryhobbit 2mo agoI think the frontier AI companies think you're missing key details: - they can still discover entire new untapped markets for AI (that, potentially, only their models can unlock) - they can find (novel, unique to them) ways to drive down the cost of running their models - they can provide other ancillary value (e.g. write better harnesses) because of their expertise, and then charge for that value I'm probably missing a few bullet points also. However, none of those are moats (or at least not yet) ... I'd consider them more like bets. The frontier AI companies are betting "the house" on them, and if they pay off they could, hypothetically, make them financially competitive.
- newswasboring 2mo ago
- gyulai 2mo ago[flagged]
- jborichevskiy 2mo agoNormally I'd agree, but the rest of the sentence does actually discuss open models and their use cases.
- inigyou 2mo agoThere isn't any open-source AI. There is Open AI (not to be confused with the closed company called OpenAI, which was unable to trademark its name). There's no open source AI both because the open source community doesn't have the resources to train a useful AI and because AI doesn't have source code.
- ses1984 2mo agoIs training code and dataset not source?
- Catloafdev 2mo agoThis is just wrong on multiple levels, the open source model ecosystem is very much a thing.
- GuB-42 2mo agoI don't know of any useful model that would match the usual definition of "open source". That is, where everything needed to build the thing is provided, such as the training data and code. Not that it would be tremendously useful anyways considering how expensive training a model is. I much prefer the "open weights" term. It is not open source in the sense that you only get the finished product, not the actual source, but it is still open in the sense that it is not only accessible as a service. For an analogy, take Quake for instance. When it was launched, its game server was available as an executable, so you could run it your machine, but that didn't make it open source. Only much later it was released as true open source software.
- draxil 2mo agoAlmost all about open weight, but the title says Open Source.
- Catloafdev 2mo agoAs someone that's generally for the proliferation of open models, I want to take this seriously, but it's really difficult when it was clearly written by AI. I guess they fired whoever used to write copy for these things. Edit: to be clear, I'm not trying to just dunk on them, I think it's actively hurting their own point to do this, and counter-productive when people can easily clock it - it makes some percent of the audience immediately tune out.
- s3p 2mo agoAgreed. Maybe we've become jaded to the writing style of AI, but it reads as disingenuous.
- radicalriddler 2mo ago> Parity reached. The contest is one layer up. I want to vomit reading that.
- LeonardoYMG 2mo ago[flagged]
- osigurdson 2mo agoI don't love the appeal to romanticism portrayed in this article.
- mistrial9 2mo agothe PDF report is far more business like, with a couple of exceptions
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- mrcwinn 2mo agoSeems quite odd to use OpenRouter as “proof” that open weights models won. If you’re using OpenRouter, you’re already looking to bypass frontier models. To suggest there’s no longer a tradeoff simply isn’t true. But this isn’t the first time I thought Mozilla was a less than trustworthy source of information.
- hungryhobbit 2mo agoI think "If you’re using OpenRouter, you’re already looking to bypass frontier models." is false. Our company uses both Claude subscriptions and OpenRouter ... and a lot of what we use OpenRouter for is more Claude. We do a little exploration with other models through it, but it's not at all accurate to say we use it because we are "already looking to bypass frontier models". ... or at least, no more than any other company that doesn't want to overpay for their tooling, but is basically happy (ATM) with the current state of Claude.
- SubiculumCode 2mo agoGemini had a pop-up on my phone today, asking me if I wanted to "bring Gemini up to speed" by importing conversations from my other AI apps. This tells me that Google is threatened, or data hungry as always, or both. Open source AI, Anthropic, and OpenAI, knocking on doors.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- docheinestages 2mo ago> The cloud era already ran this experiment: proprietary APIs plus data gravity made exit punitive. The repatriation wave is the receipt. Some sentences smell a lot like AI.
- ghost_pepper 2mo agoVirtually every article about AI these days is written by AI. It's obvious why, but boy is it nauseating to read
- lardosaurusrex 2mo agomozilla only began babbling about open source ai when they got their teeth extracted for free via the entire community giving them the curbiest of curbstomps. i still use firefox but hot damn did they utterly fail to read the room initially. the only other company i can think of in recent memory -- besides sony cutting out discs -- is logitech when their ceo began gibbering about a subscription mouse or microsoft and its copilot button(s).
- AstralSerenity 2mo agoIt's frustrating because I truly believe they are well-meaning, honest actors. Every single "controversy" surrounding Mozilla can be directly attributed to miscommunication rather than malice. They do often struggle to read the room. That said, the takeaways from this report are exciting, and I do feel that Mozilla now has the right lens in their assessment of OSS AI and their own approach to ensuring interoperability and setting open, modern standards.
- paxys 2mo agoI’m not ready to celebrate the victory of open models just yet considering all the good ones are built by private, VC funded companies. How long will they continue to be charitable? And what’s their actual business model once the money stops and investors start demanding returns?
- thih9 2mo agoI see a gap in the ecosystem: too few mature open source harnesses. I’d like a community led, BYOK, modular project where I can define, orchestrate, monitor and maintain agents. Of course this is a new area and projects like this take time. But still, IMHO, a gap exists. Unless someone wants to recommend their favorite FOSS tool; please do.
- mathieudombrock 2mo agoI use opencode as my harness which is pretty ok. I daily drive it with no issues. It's not going to do any orchestration for you but it works. I'm slowly moving to Pi but it's a very DIY system. Think neovim for agents. I think it has the potential to be where I end up for a while but it's a long road.
- hughw 2mo agoThis presentation is painful to read. It's an LLM's idea of a CTO presentation. I'm overwhelmed by charts, only slightly connected to the text around them. But no matter, it looks like a CTO slide deck. HIGH IMPACT. Much better would be if the CTO of Mozilla had actually articulated their own analysis.
- 40four 2mo agoThe charts are certainly overwhelming. I had to tap out half way through maybe
- einpoklum 2mo agoMozilla presents themselves as an "open community". But they are a commercial corporation bankrolled by Google, and with an oppressive organizational culture. I would interpret this post as being not just about an opportunity for their self-aggrandizement, but also Mozilla trying to whitewash its mass surveillance of users, likely used also to train some model or another, or perhaps just to feed their patronn (Alphabet)'s ad machine. They tell us about how the farmers and native people and whateve are all happy with their chatbots and models. The major effects are a massive and ever-increasing energy use - in a time where we must cut back and economize to avoid further global warming; a massive diversion of investment capital - especially in the US; fantastic stock valuations for a few tech giants (gee, I wonder whether any of them is related to Mozilla somehow); and other effects one could survey, all more significant by far than the examples they bring.
- himata4113 2mo agoWhen europes mismanagement of AI suddenly turns out to be the best thing that has ever happened. At best only few billions lost to training models that become obsolete next month.
- ProofHouse 2mo agoIt’s literally a paradox. It cannot be changed. Open Source AI will ultimately win. Think it through.
- semiquaver 2mo agoI am sad that there doesn’t seem to be any community whatsoever around _truly_ open models that are released with source data and training methodology, such that they could actually be reproduced given the resources. We’ve allowed the term “open” to be diluted to a shocking extent.
- kamranjon 2mo agoAllen AI is fighting the good fight with their Olmo models - I’m hoping for a new release soon. Also huggingface has released some pretty nice smaller models with open pipelines like Smollm.
- andymatuschak 2mo agoThe prose is, of course, LLM-generated. https://www.pangram.com/history/29a71663-e6b2-4db6-87bd-b9437d6f1164 https://www.pangram.com/history/29a71663-e6b2-4db6-87bd-b943... I'd be curious to learn more about how/why executives come to sign their names to this kind of writing. Maybe it feels like a natural iteration of the pre-existing experience of signing one's name to an assistant's manuscript, or a press release from staff in Comms? I don't know execs who do this kind of thing, so would be grateful for any observations others might be able to share (anonymously or otherwise). Aside: I think it would be very good for the culture if HN automatically ran Pangram on any text-centric articles. Even perhaps just those which hit the front page? I have my own browser plugin, of course, but judging by comments here, at least some seem not to notice?
- 4k0hz 2mo agoI agree that it would help the site a lot but Pangram is notoriously inaccurate.
- andymatuschak 2mo ago?? Depending on the study, false positive rates range from “undetectable” to 2:10000. Or are you worried about false negatives?
- akrolsmir 2mo agoAgreed re: automatically running Pangram, maybe once the articles hit some vote threshold (or just, frontpage) in case cost is a concern. I think aggregators running AI checks automatically seems quite good, rather than individual readers all doing it on their own sporadically. We recently implemented auto Pangram checks on Manifund, and I think LessWrong has done this for a while now.
- andai 2mo agoIt's not just a good idea — it's necessary.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- karim79 2mo agoSo...it's a commodity. It's running water. Is there a way to stop the dollars flowing away from ordinary people consuming this tech, to the doomsday Bunkerist/ Apocoligarchs of today who literally give zero fucks about lives and humanity? We already have most of the benefits from these models and have even captured them. We can now have such a system running at home on a lower power SBC which costs about a thousand dollars or much less, and requires no Internet connection. Once we have the "good enough" model which can be run at home, and with very little usage of electricity, will all this stuff finally stop messing with society like how it is messing with society now? One wonders. This is a money grab. It's a bubble. Also, I'm pretty fucking sure that Spaghetti Bolognese recipes will not improve with more and more reddit content (much of which will probably be AI generated anyway).
- myshapeprotocol 2mo ago[flagged]
- 1g10k 2mo ago[flagged]
- fnordpiglet 2mo agoLost me here - I was there - I worked on open sourcing communicator at Netscape and starting Mozilla. We were the one company that tried to own it all, but were out spent and out maneuvered by a more insidious company. This totally misunderstands the situation and the history. Plus the “our CTO” and “CTO letter” at the start was too pretentious. For gods sake; CTOs are just engineers that aren’t worth trusting because they’ve either maneuvered their way to their seat or they are serving the investors on their knees. Any CTO worth a damn knows they aren’t worth a damn. “”” We have been here before. Mozilla exists because one company tried to own the front door to the web, and an open community rose up to make sure it never could. Twenty-five years later, someone is running the same play. We bet on open the first time. Open won. Together, we can do it again. “””
- lionkor 2mo ago> Any CTO worth a damn knows they aren’t worth a damn beautiful.
- josephb2541 2mo ago[flagged]
- melodyogonna 2mo agoI'm surprised American AI companies are not trying to compete in the open weight market, that is very myopic
- dofm 2mo agoMany, many years ago I worked at a startup that employed a strange, solipsistic consultant who wrote in exactly this sort of strange, eccentric, conspiratorial note-form style, that hid his strange lack of understanding behind a dense wall of tech-mysticism. Here we are in 2026 and LLMs write like this all the time. Ultimately it will be indistinguishable from a Q drop.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- hkclawrence 2mo ago[dead]
- Tomlmmrs 2mo agoOpenSource will win in the end!
- bluerooibos 2mo ago100%. Often open source projects lag when they're too niche or don't have enough interest, but open source AI - I can't think of anything better suited to be open source and the demand/interest is through the roof - people will make it happen.
- ekianjo 2mo agoState of open source AI would be a very very short article. This is about open weights.
- anxiousandroid 2mo agoYou people are lunatics complaining about fonts. It's their own font which they've actually made open source and available? Also who cares.
- Agnes_Hao 2mo ago[flagged]