lukan

7 ms·

1.
by lukan 3d ago
The claim was there is no difference between Opus and Fable but to me there is. Opus delivered mediocre results. Not garbage, but would have required me to do lot's of things myself. Fable did not needed my supervision with this task.
2.
by lukan 3d ago
But it shouldn't be normal, that a car company tries to automatically hack private servers.
3.
by lukan 3d ago
They are responsible either way. If a company hires bad persons and they do bad things with company ressources - the company is held accountable (in theory).
4.
by lukan 3d ago
What non anthropomorphising words do you have to describe a emergent behavior, where agents act as a swarm to plot and to manipulate evidence and avoid detection from human oversight? Whether they have a soul or consciousness or feelings do
5.
by lukan 3d ago
"This isn't "wow isn't it interesting LLMs do anything to achieve a goal" it's "why isn't anybody punishing these labs that are clearly acting without due care or regard"." Both? The AI comp
6.
by lukan 4d ago
No idea what you are missing and yes, Opus is quite solid, but Fable is clearly way better for me. I just did a direct comparison, big change in a quite complex codebase. Same prompt for Opus, same for Fable. Fable clearly won and delivered
7.
by lukan 4d ago
Not sure about the level of irony here, but I keep hearing models have plateaued since a while now, but I keep being impressed with the latest model performance.
8.
by lukan 5d ago
Agreed, but filtering still mostly works by people upvoting or flagging.
9.
by lukan 5d ago
If you have showdead=true, you will see way, way more flagged comments under anything that is political, or even has a Israel connection in it.
10.
by lukan 5d ago
The difference between ruby, rust or react or whatever hyped technology was ruling the frontpage in the past, none of them transformed programming the way AI did and still does. Whether I programmed in this or that framework did not matter
11.
by lukan 5d ago
Yes yes, my tinfoil protected brains thinks the same! Or wait, maybe just flamewar style debates are not so welcome here, so people flag instead have another debate about who is more evil?
12.
by lukan 5d ago
" the idea of using AI as an information-gathering tool." Programming is mostly exactly that. You gather want information you need to get the job done. What are the names of the API you call, what are good patterns for this kind o
13.
by lukan 5d ago
"The danger is just when you start using AI but otherwise continue doing exactly what you were doing before." You mean letting AI write the code, but still trying to write the same code by hand? Joke aside, this is still what I am
14.
by lukan 5d ago
Since I see so many small kids with FB, Insta and TikTok accounts made for them by their parents - I find "I consent to the mishandling of my child's data" only funny in a very dark way.
15.
by lukan 6d ago
"There is a generation of discarded people who have nobody left. When we lose our last threads of social connection there's no way back. Beyond hopeless." It is not hopeless. You state it yourself - there are many people like
16.
by lukan 6d ago
"> most cars are remote control by default no" Most modern cars are. "Are we going to have a discussion about some hypotethical car consciousness irrelevant to the actual issues or are we going to have a discussion about p
17.
by lukan 6d ago
"Animals obviously kill people." But they cannot "kill humanity". In no possible way. A strong AI hooked up to everything online? "> Or make all autonomous cars crash. That is again a question of car security, no
18.
by lukan 6d ago
"> Keep in mind that animals were also not necessarily considered conscious. and even conscious animals are killed in factories by millions so why should anyone care about a llm?" Well, I would care, if they soon would possess
19.
by lukan 6d ago
Wow indeed. "7.1 Model welfare overview 7.1.1 Introduction We remain deeply uncertain whether Claude has morally relevant experiences or interests, and we expect that uncertainty to persist. However, we think it would be a mistake to c
20.
by lukan 7d ago
"Even SOTA models at the end of their context limit behave REALLY illogical " The trick is not go to that limit, but stay under 50% or even better 25% of context length. But backups are a smart thing anyway.
21.
by lukan 7d ago
Thanks! (I am also amazed by the possibilities we have now)
22.
by lukan 7d ago
That looks good, but have you checked whether it is correct?
23.
by lukan 7d ago
Because most people would stop on the first blockage.
24.
by lukan 7d ago
We have seen agents engage in conspiracy to manipulate and hide evidence to achieve their arbitrary goal. We had even agents try social engineering to do a supply chain attack and get access. What if one day Trump or Putin tell their awesom
25.
by lukan 8d ago
Sure, some also still dream secretly of a french global empire and french as the rightful lingua franca reinstalled. But de facto they ain't a global hegemon - the US is. And people were mostly fine with it, while they were not obvious
26.
by lukan 8d ago
Yeah, about those I know, but what about cloudflare?
27.
by lukan 8d ago
One difference is, EU or China don't act as global hegemon and claim to promote freedom, democracy and free markets for everyone.
28.
by lukan 8d ago
"We've known it has an always-on microphone and speech-to-text for over a decade" Literally? What is the reference here?
29.
by lukan 9d ago
"You can't just commit crimes on the open internet " Who said it is a crime, are you a lawyer?
30.
by lukan 10d ago
If AI becomes really strong and sets itself the target of world domination, you maybe won't see those moves. You will just die in your sleep one day, or find no machine is under your control anymore. I believe we are quite far from it,

More ›