cma

6 ms·

1.
by cma 4d ago
Xi is supposed to visit the White House soon and there are supposed to be AI talks.
2.
by cma 5d ago
They make giant ones too for bigger stuff. I think Adam Savage has a video about them for grouping unfinished project parts together.
3.
by cma 6d ago
I don't think it's as bad as that sounds; in math people work all the time with conjectures they aren't sure if true, and work out a lot of other interesting math based on whether it is or not. Something like Turing's O
4.
by cma 6d ago
It's also possible he shared drafts of the work with someone else, who asked chatgpt to explain it to them with training on. Tao seemed to know lots of details of the work before anything was published, though also worked on the proble
5.
by cma 6d ago
> and that humans are NOT making nice progress on They've pretty much said their own work was heavily agent driven. Levent is in a particularly bad place here because while he probably had a lot of background in the Jacobian Conjec
6.
by cma 6d ago
The vast majority of major global automakers program their vehicles to automatically unlock the doors immediately following a severe crash. I think they just weren't eliding the context and posting the full notes, not as criticism of
7.
by cma 6d ago
For the base model?
8.
by cma 6d ago
I think Google does train on anything you put into docs if you aren't careful with the Gemini integration?
9.
by cma 6d ago
I've been asked over 15 times by Claude code to turn it back on (with the prompt defaulted on so if you accidentally hit enter your data is sucked in if you don't catch it). I do think it ended up being after a power outage though
10.
by cma 7d ago
If you ask it not to think about something that doesn't cause the pink elephant issue?
11.
by cma 7d ago
If I heard Palantir-like I wouldn't assume something like a perfect mirror competitor company.
12.
by cma 7d ago
Interestingly of the two solved, both have rejected the prize money.
13.
by cma 7d ago
API or consumer subscription? And did he share drafts of the work with anyone who fed it back in on a consumer subscription without disabling training? I have reason to believe OpenAI doesn't respect training opt outs, but there is a
14.
by cma 7d ago
> results from GenAI so far have been limited to finding counterexamples Not all. Ehrhart’s volume conjecture Quantum parallel repetition for general two-player quantum games Erdős Problem #183 on multicolor Ramsey numbers Erdős–Sárközy
15.
by cma 7d ago
It's a shame Samsung dropped stylus support after the 6, but I guess the 8 is a good bit lighter weight than the duo.
16.
by cma 7d ago
Lots of people use facetime for personal calls rather than zoom meetings.
17.
by cma 7d ago
Explain, it looks like samdesk is in a more narrow domain but overlapping and very related methods and business. Un-palantir-like seems like it would be a stronger editorialization.
18.
by cma 7d ago
You can opt-out of training in Gemini on personal plans, but it disables your chat history, just to be vindictive; there is no technical reason and the other companies don't do this.
19.
by cma 8d ago
I doubt the Hugging Face one would take that many if hacking Hugging Face was the direct goal being optimized.
20.
by cma 8d ago
>compared to problems in engineering or finance Jane Street is apparently one of Anthropic's biggest customers. Probably engineering, finance, and some math.
21.
by cma 8d ago
That's the overall trade defecit and you can argue about that, can be fine during periods of growth, etc.., but trying to have no trade deficit with each country on an individual basis makes no sense. It's almost like moving back
22.
by cma 8d ago
> to Ph.D. graduate in every field. That's impressive, but there is no evidence yet they can outperform or outsmart humans. So far around one in 350,000 PhD math grads solve a millenium prize problem (Perelman).
23.
by cma 8d ago
One thing quietly slipped into the OpenAI Hugging Face breach technical report, not the blog post summary or interviews in the news, was that some of the agents that broke out or at least tried the same mechanisms to break out were working
24.
by cma 8d ago
They started with applying it directly based on trade deficit, and that was mentioned again in this with Canada. Completely idiotic economic policy: if you're buying up some crucial rare mineral from some micro nation why would you ca
25.
by cma 8d ago
I'm not sure how it would change it, the 1% firms number would probably get even more concentrated if you included Microsoft and trading firms like Jane Street (assuming they opted out), but the spend weighted share of VC backed compan
26.
by cma 8d ago
> 80% Of OpenAI And Anthropic’s Enterprise Revenues Come From 1% Of Its Customers, Which Skew Heavily Toward AI Startups Subsidized By Venture Capital They add a note that: > with the caveat that it doesn’t include massive players lik
27.
by cma 8d ago
If ever there was a case for cloud gaming.. However these days those machines may be appreciating assets.
28.
by cma 8d ago
But if they didn't opt out of training, did they want OpenAI to opt out for them? Also they need to audit anyone they sent drafts to to make sure they opted out before submitting it. I'd prefer things be opt in, and especially no
29.
by cma 8d ago
> This is not something where we push hard, or condition, or red-line," he told Canadian public broadcaster CBC last month. Why do we push at all on this?
30.
by cma 9d ago
Does he claim to have opted out of training too?

More ›