unethical_ban

7 ms·

1.
by unethical_ban 3d ago
In the long term, I think you're correct. In the medium term, AI still won't know your business-specific workflows and data relationships, and humans are needed to define those things and let the AI build the scaffolding around it
2.
by unethical_ban 4d ago
Not every pocket thief or drunkard who finds your phone has cellebritr. Security measures consider the threat model. More specifically, another commenter in this thread says it's to make sure the user is aware of the configuration of a
3.
by unethical_ban 5d ago
Scrap the current forms of elected representation with one that encourages multiple parties instead of a forced dichotomy. Create some kind of constant recall mechanism for elected officials. And other things.
4.
by unethical_ban 6d ago
Glad we agree. I can't tell if I'm being downvoted by anti-Musk people who didn't read the whole comment, or pro-Musk people mad that I called him out for funding disinformation campaigns.
5.
by unethical_ban 6d ago
SpaceX is amazing, and he may receive due credit for the "vision" of pushing forward the state of the art in electric vehicles and rockets. We (society) often glosses over personal failings of popular figures. But given the level
6.
by unethical_ban 7d ago
Yes, there is an expectation in the history of free society that the government is not proactively observing every person on every block, asking for ID, and following them down the streets, then documenting that and correlating it with ot
7.
by unethical_ban 8d ago
Is your suggestion that no one care?
8.
by unethical_ban 9d ago
The number of so-called liberals in my life who didn't vote in 2024 because "both sides suck" is greater than zero, and this gnaws at me every time I think about it. I am not offended at the idea of countries decoupling from
9.
by unethical_ban 9d ago
There is a 100% chance that someone in Broadcom exec team is making money shorting themselves. Or else some insider assurance that they'd get so much money from government or some big customer that they could run their products into th
10.
by unethical_ban 11d ago
The loosest definition might be "isolated network or leaf node of the internet" if one considers a non-natted DMZ to be a lan. If one thinks all the assumptions in the article are bogus, then I agree there's no definition of
11.
by unethical_ban 11d ago
The problem then doesn't have to do with AI specifically, it requires human intervention and vetting. If the problem is "someone submitted an AI-written request that got rubberstamped", the problem is the stamp, not the AI. I
12.
by unethical_ban 11d ago
I get the idea, but this isn't necessarily useful as advice and toys with definitions. It's ESPN levels of conversation-baiting. Lots of assumptions can be reasonably made about residential LANs without being true of enterprise LA
13.
by unethical_ban 11d ago
Perhaps the centralization of governance and the asymmetric power of government over the people is the problem. If a village of 20 people found out one of their members had been poisoning them for years, knowingly, to attain status as the m
14.
by unethical_ban 12d ago
It isn't just about money, it's about who. I don't think the companies using it are using it to create botnets. The intention is for highly targeted pieces of software to use it to secure their code and be ahead of the game b
15.
by unethical_ban 13d ago
I get that concept, but what part of the user is the product at HF? Even openrouter I get because at least it's a broker of all the user's information. HF to me is a glorified file host with no private user data access, no complex
16.
by unethical_ban 13d ago
What data can an be extracted from hf though? With GitHub you get a lot of user behavior analysis and can offer enterprise features and see private repositories.
17.
by unethical_ban 13d ago
>CPS responded, he recounts, that "a 5-year-old child can never be unsupervised." I would immediately move from that neighborhood and that city, if they do not have roots with neighbors or kids' friends. These are people w
18.
by unethical_ban 14d ago
Do you hear yourself?
19.
by unethical_ban 14d ago
Agree with the idea that maybe, in a nation of brainwashed and stupid people who can't trust each other, we need paper ballots to make things easy to understand. I disagree that people only vote by mail due to laziness or that the admi
20.
by unethical_ban 14d ago
I don't believe you argue in good faith. Troll behavior is so depressing.
21.
by unethical_ban 14d ago
Different person. In short: I get distracted at home, and home is no longer home - it's the office. I work best when talking through my mental blocks with people. As a consultant I've never gotten over trying to poke my head in vi
22.
by unethical_ban 14d ago
Literally crawl, walk, run... fight? The physical world is currently designed for human interaction, and people who want to make money see the potential to replace humans with property. They'll get there. "Your scientists were thi
23.
by unethical_ban 14d ago
The ideal would be that a new president is elected who uses current powers to reverse/rebuild what Trump has torn down and have their "one big bill" that Congress seems to pull off per president be a reforms package that lock
24.
by unethical_ban 15d ago
That using AI to create derivative works of proprietary or copyrighted content would count as intellectual property theft.
25.
by unethical_ban 15d ago
In such a way that it can partially break connectivity and in a way that fails to have users think about security explicitly, yes. Imperfectly.
26.
by unethical_ban 16d ago
I've had the issue on multiple phones. Firefox nightly seemed to fix it for a while but it suffers from it too after a while. I need to test if it's UBO or the sister comment that says closing tabs and restarting helps. It's
27.
by unethical_ban 16d ago
I use firefox on all devices, but there are two notches against it in my book: Firefox on Android lags during scrolling on multiple sites that do not lag on Chrome. The only extension I have is UBO, and I don't know if that is the caus
28.
by unethical_ban 16d ago
You are correct. The reason NAT is seen as security on home networks is that, absent a firewall, it acts as a default deny to inbound traffic.
29.
by unethical_ban 16d ago
NAT only serves as the janky inbound default deny because IPv4 doesn't have the address space. There are very few things NAT solves in a world without address exhaustion; the only one I can think of off hand is a janky method of forcin
30.
by unethical_ban 16d ago
The fact that the number is still based on the birth of Christ shows people are not pretending it isn't based on that. The term CE was adopted to lessen the implied endorsement of said religion via the terms Christ and "the year o

More ›