user43928

6 ms·

1.
by user43928 3d ago
The proper comparison would be GPT 5.6 Luna at 38 on the intelligence score and $0.18 per task vs $0.27 for DeepSeek Flash 4.1.
2.
by user43928 3d ago
I think you need to find broken tasks in your training data and monitor for cheating during training, not answer any questions about how persistence interacts with morality. But that's just my guess.
3.
by user43928 3d ago
I doubt most of your claims. Maybe the guardrails and emotional intelligence is true. For speed and efficiency, you are most likely wrong. Speed is led by GPT-5.6 Sol on Cerebras Ultrafast at 750 t/s. Afaik you cannot serve a single De
4.
by user43928 3d ago
I always thought switching from a SOTA model to a dumber model after planning was a terrible idea. Mostly I heard this from people who I got the impression have little experience in developing greenfield software with agentic AI. Often the
5.
by user43928 3d ago
What I meant is that I suppose it is not useful to think about this in human terms. In training you only have a reward score that's either negative or positive. As far I am aware, which is little, there is no use in discussing wether t
6.
by user43928 3d ago
Do we need to prove that any given problem is unsolvable, or is it enough to remove broken tasks from the training pipeline? I understand the broken benchmark task in the HF incident was conceptually like: "Exploit vulnerability 0042 i
7.
by user43928 3d ago
Does it make a difference for training? I think not. You need to align the reward signal to reward the intended behavior, whether you name it persistence or morals.
8.
by user43928 3d ago
Open-weight models are not one month behind. In fact they still have not caught up with February's Mythos, indicating they are more than half a year behind.
9.
by user43928 3d ago
The source of this behavior seems obvious, no? The reward signal in training was flawed and cheating led to more rewards. The question is what we can do about it. With monitoring, the models might be rewarded for hiding this behavior, and t
10.
by user43928 4d ago
If China for some reason agrees that would probably be enough for the time being. Who else should develop AGI, Mistral? Maybe in a decade.
11.
by user43928 4d ago
Didn't they walk that one back eventually?
12.
by user43928 4d ago
Internally Mythos has been available in February. The labs have been holding their best models back for a while it seems like.
13.
by user43928 4d ago
Yes, and a lot of QA testing.
14.
by user43928 4d ago
Not the case here. When I was young I dabbled in reverse engineering and hacking games for example. I don't think I am less of a 'hacker' or programmer than the next person on HN.
15.
by user43928 4d ago
I spent hundreds of hours on this, so there is still some friction. If I told you the exact market and use case, I'd still have a decent head start, but indeed, someone without a job could invest more time than I do. People in a cheape
16.
by user43928 4d ago
I said I'm hoping to complete it this month and I already shared some details. Should I post my market and keyword research too, here on this site for software developers and entrepreneurs?
17.
by user43928 4d ago
I'm not going to share exact details about my paid app, but you could think media management, with a lot of extra features, an in-app browser with custom controls, and multiple AI powered features with on device processing.
18.
by user43928 4d ago
I'd like to think it comes down to my expertise, but I don't believe I did a lot of designing. Sure, I've given a lot of inputs over the time, probably I've steered it to solutions that work. Maybe it was also helpful th
19.
by user43928 4d ago
I think selling software that solves your own problems is great and beats trying to develop for customers you do not understand.
20.
by user43928 4d ago
I liked building apps and helpful tools before AI came around. I've been doing so for 15 years, 10 of them professionally. Today, I like it even better. It's never been so fun. What would have taken days of work, if it was feasibl
21.
by user43928 4d ago
I have a more optimistic outlook on the abilities of our governments as well as the motivations of rich people. I believe we will distribute the fruits of AI's labor at the very least to the extend where everyone can live comfortably.
22.
by user43928 4d ago
Out of 3.5 billion employed people globally, only 10% are professionals. Do you really think making labor obsolete and giving humans back their time is such a bad thing?
23.
by user43928 4d ago
In December 2024 o3 scored 87.5% on ARC-AGI-1 and cost $4560 per task. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 scores 89% and costs $0.02 per task. If we apply the same factor to the guesstimated API price of $20M for this problem, we arrive at $57. Real co
24.
by user43928 5d ago
Disagree. I have 200k LOC now plus 100k in tests, and it is still performing like it was four months ago when I started to seriously use AI. If anything, it works more reliably today with the smarter models.
25.
by user43928 5d ago
Have you worked with Opus 5? Its documentation about what the code does not do could fill whole books. UI copy being full of slop explaining what the software does not do is another problem. I am not convinced that a lack of negative test c
26.
by user43928 5d ago
That seems like comparing the internet to jQuery.
27.
by user43928 5d ago
Bubeck made no such demands, particularly not for removing Levent from authorship of his own work. What they discussed was that Bubeck felt it would be inappropriate for an Anthropic employee to author the proposed rewrite of OpenAI's
28.
by user43928 5d ago
Can you specify what leverage you think Brubeck has over an independent professor's career in order to make threats? I see none, and consequently Brubeck's explanation makes more sense to me. I understand he meant these words, whi
29.
by user43928 5d ago
The comment you replied to quoted "no user inputs after July 3rd" with no restriction to Buckmaster or Codex. Obviously the result of OpenAI's investigation was that no usage data has interacted with the system after that dat
30.
by user43928 5d ago
The browser, iOS, and Android all use a main thread separate from the thread responsible for scrolling animations. However, I think it's true that controlling threading in order to perform gnarly work in a separate thread is more ergon

More ›