zdragnar

5 ms·

1.
by zdragnar 3d ago
Some offer zero data retention policies, but there can be weasel words. For example, on the individual pro plan, you can turn off the setting that lets them train models on your data, but they still have a section in their terms that allows
2.
by zdragnar 4d ago
I've observed this dichotomy myself. Some people will make things because they enjoy the experience of making. Others make things because they enjoy achieving an outcome- happy client, open source community, a new useful tool for thems
3.
by zdragnar 5d ago
Only 100? Those are good odds in the current market...
4.
by zdragnar 6d ago
There's plenty of links in Dublin comments for other instances of the tech being developed at least partially, and at least one for in-home fire suppression. Given that last one, I'm thinking it operates on the basis of resonance
5.
by zdragnar 6d ago
The company my brother works for (fairly small) is involved in the construction and maintenance of the electrical side of the data grid. Apparently they need to hire at least 20 people a month for the foreseeable future to keep up with dema
6.
by zdragnar 6d ago
You're right, I was thinking in my head "equally possible based on the information presented" but didn't write it out. Were I a betting man, I'd put money on them being paid to transfer the name rather than X screwi
7.
by zdragnar 7d ago
No, there's no evidence either way. Both are equally possible. The odds of X forcefully handing a handle over from a user to Meta for an AI product seem lower to me than them being paid for it, but that's not based on anything eit
8.
by zdragnar 7d ago
"lost" is incredibly misleading, as there's no evidence they weren't paid to hand the handles over.
9.
by zdragnar 8d ago
At my admittedly very tiny workplace, I'm the only one who uses agents at all. The rest just use the web interface, though one tried cursor for a bit.
10.
by zdragnar 8d ago
I'm not saying they are crazy, I'm saying their predictions have a record of not being accurate, and thus give them no weight compared to others'. In any case, if Altman really does believe it is an existential threat, he mus
11.
by zdragnar 8d ago
Having witnessed so many people treat LLMs as a something divine, I can only assume the reasonable people at openai and anthropic were all pushed out long ago, and the majority that remain believe the crazy hype despite Tesla-self-driving-l
12.
by zdragnar 8d ago
Technically yes, but the struggle to keep IE out of quirks mode was real, and that meant a doctype and head and all the things.
13.
by zdragnar 8d ago
Thermal residue?
14.
by zdragnar 9d ago
It's the difference between a "negative" and a "positive" right. The former is something that government cannot do (compel or prohibit speech) whereas a positive right is something the government is obligated to pro
15.
by zdragnar 10d ago
It's anthropic, of course the entire team is also using AI to do the code reviews.
16.
by zdragnar 10d ago
Do sufficient facilities exist to keep up with the recycling demand that will exist 25-50 years from now for panels? If not, then the $5 per panel needs to be increased to account for the extra infrastructure.
17.
by zdragnar 11d ago
LLMs can be self hosted though. Using Claude to build a self hosting platform is a bit like telling people they should be vegan while you're eating a bacon sandwich.
18.
by zdragnar 11d ago
Far more or far less? The study is so profoundly flawed that it should be in a hall of shame, along with whatever journal published it.
19.
by zdragnar 11d ago
The only plan was to make making cheaper. There wasn't a plan for the people afterwards.
20.
by zdragnar 11d ago
Because the incentive is what drives change. You're not going to convince America or Western Europe to live strict vegan lifestyles if they are adverse to it. Further, as the poor people grow wealthier, they begin to eat more meat unle
21.
by zdragnar 13d ago
That's because movies were based on the "general" nature of AI, assuming we would create intelligence that would learn and grow. Pretty much the opposite of what we can't up with, if you're willing to call what we h
22.
by zdragnar 13d ago
Dealing with sugar specifically, sufficient concentrations act as a preservative as well. Honey, in particular, can be applied to surface wounds to help promote healing by resisting infection. Also, it's delicious, and you're less
23.
by zdragnar 14d ago
Ask the Europeans, most of the US wasn't online when this hit the front page.
24.
by zdragnar 14d ago
Most of the US isn't online yet, so I would expect this to be mostly people from the East side of the pond voting on it. In any case, onto the merits of the article itself: Renewable, net zero energy requires massively expanding the gr
25.
by zdragnar 15d ago
You've already answered your own question. They don't provide an API with zero trust. Many services are legally required to collect the information anyway. Telehealth billing through insurance, for example, require it for the old
26.
by zdragnar 15d ago
The argument is to not make any changes to what people call planets but to instead have taken the opportunity in 2006 to create a separate classification system. Use something vaguely Latin sounding like planitus or whatever.
27.
by zdragnar 16d ago
We had the perfect opportunity to introduce new names when the IAU created the "dwarf planet" classification in 2006. That was literally the perfect time to do it all over.
28.
by zdragnar 16d ago
No, the alternative would be to make up some latin sounding words for planets, dwarf planets, etc. and leave the vulgar planet alone to the standard 9 that we all know are planets.
29.
by zdragnar 16d ago
Somebody didn't grow up with early console games.
30.
by zdragnar 16d ago
Peanuts, cashews, almonds, walnuts, pecans, Brazil nuts and pistachios are culinary nuts but NOT botanical nuts. Botanical berries: Bananas, tomatoes, grapes, cucumbers, eggplants, avocados and peppers, but NOT strawberries, raspberries, bl

More ›