lionkor

8 ms·

1.
by lionkor 7d ago
Same here, but I want to add that you can easily do this for all apps BUT one or two. For example, I have my messaging and personal emails allowed to send me notifications, because almost all messages I get there are important and usually u
2.
by lionkor 7d ago
I can really recommend an automatic watch. Go to a jewelry store, try some on in the below 300 euro category (like, 10 euro to 300 euro range), and get one. Suddenly you can leave your phone somewhere, and not panic-check the time on it and
3.
by lionkor 7d ago
Human memory does not keep more information than an always-on live transcript of all words spoken around you.
4.
by lionkor 7d ago
Of course it can be useful! Even the situation from the stream is useful! This doesn't make it a good feature that should be so easy, so prominently advertised, and impossible for others to tell that it's on.
5.
by lionkor 7d ago
And antenna lines near the hinge
6.
by lionkor 7d ago
Slightly besides the point, but I love seeing people in massive modern SUVs, clearly completely overwhelmed by them, barely able to tell where it starts and ends, probably distracted by the screen. Its especially funny in parking here lots
7.
by lionkor 7d ago
v4 pro is being discontinued, pasted the email here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49639667
8.
by lionkor 7d ago
I'm a big fan of DeepSeek. Also, ask it what model it is :) In Pi (pi.dev), it tells me it's definitely Claude by Anthropic, via the API via curl it tells me it's "probably ChatGPT", its very funny.
9.
DeepSeek v4 Pro discontinuation (email)
1 points by lionkor 7d ago|0 comments
10.
by lionkor 8d ago
This is the drug-dealer justification -- "if I don't [sell drugs|provide mass surveillance at an unprecedented scale|crush these kittens] someone else will"
11.
by lionkor 8d ago
Who should get credit? Sam Altman, and we should give him a couple hundred billion more as well. Snark aside, the researchers working on this, who built the foundation, should get credit, and they are.
12.
by lionkor 8d ago
A couple hundred billion dollars of investment better solve cancer, hunger, and climate change, otherwise they are horribly misplaced :)
13.
by lionkor 8d ago
How would it generalize? Let's say I use C, in which `class` is not a keyword, how would a model generalize such that it recognizes this?
14.
by lionkor 11d ago
I don't care if the text is AI generated. I care that it's written well, and that it's accurate. If an LLM helps you do that, then use it.
15.
by lionkor 11d ago
This thread seems to confuse source-available and open source
16.
by lionkor 11d ago
If you think an LLM can just implement e.g. an alternative to the Linux kernel from scratch (or any other GPL licensed software), you might be falling for the marketing. Have you seen LLMs build large, stable, pieces of software, that work
17.
by lionkor 13d ago
There are SO many options here in Germany for all things retail that this can 100% kill an option for me
18.
by lionkor 13d ago
Open source is about freedom, not just about being able to read the source code.
19.
by lionkor 23d ago
I struggle very much to understand the "why". There's a git server, it's installed when you install git, and it really does work very well. > every instance is a disposable cache that revalidates with one conditional
20.
by lionkor 24d ago
There are two nuances here; 1. The author might be exaggerating or lying in regards to the capabilities, ease of use, and result 2. if Claude can do it without hardware access, I struggle to see how it could be anything other than unsigned
21.
by lionkor 27d ago
But GitHub were one of the first and strongest to advocate for using AI, so excessively in fact that it turned people away from the platform. At every turn on the website it suggested to use Copilot, or edit it right now, and commit right n
22.
by lionkor 27d ago
Oat.ink is very cool, thanks for sharing!
23.
by lionkor 1mo ago
* GitLab * Forgejo Those are my favorites. Both you can self-host for your company, including CI/CD.
24.
by lionkor 1mo ago
As someone who maintained a product that was, until recently, on Azure DevOps, stay away. Like, really really far away. There's nothing positive I can say about it.
25.
by lionkor 1mo ago
It means it doesn't count towards their uptime at all, I guess, because all their uptime stats are very high for a service that is down more than anything else I use
26.
by lionkor 1mo ago
The idea is, I believe, that the Pro model is a larger model (more parameters, or less quantization) in general. What implication that has, I couldn't tell you. For tasks like pondering on something, reviewing code, etc. I use Pro, jus
27.
by lionkor 1mo ago
Also got the email. It warned of a future large price increase, and to carefully watch usage. I read it as a "hey we will make stuff more expensive, don't miss it"
28.
by lionkor 1mo ago
What point are you making? Can you elaborate?
29.
by lionkor 1mo ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
30.
by lionkor 1mo ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

More ›