11 ms·
Google Fulfilled ICE Subpoena Demanding Student Journalist Credit Card Number
- LightBug1 7mo ago[flagged]
- jmclnx 7mo agoI left google search for duckduckgo a few years ago due to all the marketing drivel returned. I guess there is yet another, better reason, to avoid google. As for gmail, it joined my old yahoo mail as a dumping ground. If some site wants an email, they get my gmail address, which I never go to these days. But how did google get this person's info ? Are they spying on their emails, or worse yet, are they scraping data for apps you installed on your android phone ?
- Forgeties79 7mo agoJust wish I could get off gcal. Too many friends/family on it
- ceejayoz 7mo agoGoogle Calendar is pretty cross-compatible. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICalendar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICalendar
- JoshTriplett 7mo agoFastmail's calendar works reasonably well. My two complaints with it: - There isn't a convenient calendar widget; Google's calendar widget only works with Google's calendar. I'd like something exactly like Google's calendar widget but working with Fastmail's calendar. - Sites that integrate with Google Calendar but not with arbitrary CalDAV servers. I could live without the latter, but the former is a dealbreaker; I'd switch given a functional widget that is fully self-contained and doesn't require some separate sync app.
- efreak 7mo agoWidget for what? Mobile OS? Websites?
- JoshTriplett 7mo agoAndroid.
- efreak 7mo agoI'm assuming you're looking for the monthly planner view that actually shows events and not just indicators? Try calendar widgets suite or business calendar 2 planner. Unfortunately both are ad-supported (anything designed explicitly to show local personal information shouldn't go online IMHO), but there's a paid version as well. There's a couple other apps that have similar looking widgets as well, you might find more by searching for monthly planner widgets, not calendar widgets. It might also be possible to find one using a week toolkit (I used Zooper in the past, but I think it's pretty dead now; not sure what's replaced it). https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.joshy21.vera.calendarplus.widgets https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.joshy21.ve... https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.appgenix.bizcal https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.appgenix.b... https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.komorebi.n.calendar https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.komorebi.n... https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.joshy21.vera.free.calendarplus https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.joshy21.ve...
- bl4kers 7mo agoHuh? There is little to no lock-in
- starik36 7mo agoWhat do you think is going to happen when DDG or Fastmail gets a FISA warrant? You think they will stand their ground and go to prison to protect your info? History (like the PRISM project) says no.
- ceejayoz 7mo agoThe article indicates even Meta pushed back on some of these: > Unlike Thomas-Johnson, users in that case were given the chance to fight the subpoena because they were made aware of it before Meta complied.
- inkysigma 7mo agoI think those are two different orders: one with a gag order and one without. In cases without gag orders, Google has pushed back or requested users fight the subpoena. In this instance, Google got a gag order while Meta doesn't appear to have gotten one. I'm not sure how gag orders like this can be legal. I'm sure there's like Nat Sec defenses but it sure seems dangerous to say the target cannot be notified of such requests.
- yborg 7mo agoFastmail is Australian, though?
- nobody9999 7mo ago>What do you think is going to happen when DDG or Fastmail gets a FISA warrant? You think they will stand their ground and go to prison to protect your info? I don't know about Fastmail, but according to DuckDuckGo[0]: Does DuckDuckGo share my search and browsing history with governments? No. Per our strict Privacy Policy[1]: "Critically, it's not possible for us to provide search or browsing histories linked to you in response to legal requests because we don't have them." "We don’t save or share your search or browsing history when you search on DuckDuckGo or use our apps and extensions." [0] https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/misconceptions/does-duckduckgo-share-my-search-history-with-governments https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/misconceptions/... [1] https://duckduckgo.com/privacy https://duckduckgo.com/privacy
- hsuduebc2 7mo ago[flagged]
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- Anonbrit 7mo agoSeveral companies have resisted these court orders successfully. Google can afford a lawyer to go over the order with a fine tooth comb if they wanted to - it's just easier to roll over and let the government rub their belly. Trump has also repeatedly used government apparatus to illegally retaliate against companies and individuals for not going hos way, with no consequence, so it is hard to entirely blame corporations for behaving that way
- agilob 7mo agoThey changed the motto to "do the right thing", because, apparently "evil" is too ambiguous. "Do the right thing" is more suitable motto for a company whos CEO was a buddy of Epstein. Tech CEOs helped get Trump elected and strengthen ICE regime to protect the billionaires, they were all involved.
- hsuduebc2 7mo agoThat was really their argument? Quite contrary, the "right thing" is the ambiguous one. I think that most people agree what is evil. Certainly much more than what is right.
- Filligree 7mo agoWere they legally required to?
- diego_moita 7mo ago[flagged]
- everforward 7mo agoIt reflects even worse on Google for vacuuming up and keeping the data. They can’t really refuse to hand over the data, but they could purge and stop collecting identifying data on Americans. As is, they are tacitly complicit by collecting data they know will be used against protesters.
- mikae1 7mo ago> they could purge and stop collecting identifying data on Americans. That's their entire business model though...
- everforward 7mo agoTheir business model is ads, which doesn’t inherently require storing information the government would want. Some of that data probably isn’t useful in that space, others might reduce efficacy by a tiny margin but it wouldn’t shut them down. Eg I can’t think of a reason why they’d need to store your exact location. Do people target ads down to a precise GPS location, or even a street? I can’t imagine they need things more granular than a ZIP code. That also doesn’t absolve them of supporting autocracy. The difference between the morally upright and the morally bankrupt is what they do when doing the right thing will cost them, not what they do when the right thing is free.
- wyager 7mo agoLet's be real, if a bigtech ignored judicial orders, whether you would describe it as "fighting autocracy" or "corporate fascism" is 100% dependent on who is currently in office Google is a multi trillion dollar company, not a scrappy libertarian upstart ready to gamble everything in court
- bovermyer 7mo ago[flagged]
- hsuduebc2 7mo agoI would say that it's just ordinary greed driven company. Which is basically normal corporation. Why net negative tho?
- bovermyer 7mo agoThe "net" refers here to "the good that Google does" (e.g., some pretty impressive networking research) is outweighed by "the bad that Google does," such as the linked article. Nothing is pure evil or pure good. Gauging where on the scale a person or group lies is really hard, and subjective. So, I try and keep score on the big players, but understand that my judgement is fallible.
- hsuduebc2 7mo agoOh I understand what you meant by net negative, I was more curious about the thing's you perceive negatively. I myself consider them net neutral but the trend itself is negative.
- juliusceasar 7mo ago[flagged]
- hsuduebc2 7mo agoJust out of curiosity. Are there any companies today that are seen the way Google used to be seen, as a generally “good” corporation/companies that are also a important player? Maybe Mozilla Foundation?
- agilob 7mo agoBlizzard, Microsoft come to mind
- saubeidl 7mo agoBlizzard is a bunch of sex pests and Microsoft is the guys with the AI upsells on every inch of their OS...
- agilob 7mo agoWasn't Blizzard pretty alright back when Diablo 2 was released? and then LoD?
- SlightlyLeftPad 7mo agoAll that was Blizzard North honestly. So it depended on locality.
- passwordoops 7mo agoHow far back do you have to go for Microsoft to be seen as "good" the way Google was?
- diego_moita 7mo agoDoes anyone still remember when Western countries were scared of Huawei because the Chinese would use their hardware to spy on people? Well, guess what? The U.S. also has their own Huawei. But, at least, they're "democratic" and follow "the rule of the law" (for whatever these words mean nowadays).
- AlexandrB 7mo agoWhy the hell did Google even have his bank account numbers? I wish there was more information on which Google service(s) this data was pulled from.
- ceejayoz 7mo agoYou can setup ACH for a number of Google services; Cloud, Workspace, the Play Store.
- rvz 7mo ago[flagged]
- barbazoo 7mo ago> So when are you going to stop using Google? (Never) Why the meta commentary? Obviously some of us have unFANGed their lives.
- JohnMakin 7mo agoThese kind of condescending comments are a bit much, especially when not everyone has the luxury or know-how to deFAANG their lives. For instance, whether or not (I) personally want to avoid it, I use some of this for actual work, and there is no alternative. Comments like this seem to imply then I have no right to complain about it, which is frankly ridiculous - there is a world where FAANGs can exist without being far reaching apparatuses of an authoritarian regime. They do so because it is convenient and the existing power structure incentivizes it. Like what am I gonna do in a job interview - "Oh, you guys use gsuite? Sorry, I deFAANGed." Come on.
- throwway120385 7mo agoIt's almost like there should be some third party that represents people who could regulate companies like Google and prevent them from becoming too big. Maybe there are some examples from US history where some such third party existed.
- skrtskrt 7mo agoWe're on the forum where people are most capable of doing this for themselves. And if your company uses GMail that is less than ideal for de-Googling, but it does not meaningfully impact the benefits of de-Googling your personal life. Refusing to run all your search history, personal transactions, and correspondences through one of the fascist state's pet companies is still beneficial.
- JohnMakin 7mo agoIf you use a work google profile on your home network, tied to your real name, it definitely affects your personal life
- x1ph0z 7mo agoWhat are some ways users can insulate themselves from something like this?
- Anonbrit 7mo agoDon't use products from large US tech companies? Apple has a slightly better track record than Google of fighting this stuff, but ultimately if you're using a product from a US tech company then it's likely ICE can get their grubby little mitts on everything that company knows about you
- pixl97 7mo agoI'm guessing your constraint is impossible as living in the US pretty much requires banking and working with companies that will gladly give government agencies your information. I severely doubt that tech is the only group doing this.
- panarky 7mo agoIs there any evidence that Apple fights administrative subpoenas issued by US federal agencies? Or is Google just more transparent than Apple about the government orders it complies with? For example, after the Department of Justice demanded app stores remove apps that people use to track ICE deployments, Apple was the first to comply, followed later by Google.
- nomel 7mo agoIt's a constitutional right to record them doing their duties, in public. That's clear. Here's a question: Is making a reporting system around that, for the purpose of/approaches/is realtime tracking, also protected? Maybe related to "non-permanence"? (references welcome)
- frumplestlatz 7mo agoSure it is. The same way it was legal to track and report on CIA "extraordinary rendition" flights using publicly available information. What is not protected is actual interference or obstruction, and first amendment protections can be lost if the system’s design, stated purpose, or predictable use crosses from observation and reporting into intimidation or operational coordination that materially interferes or obstructs. Given how these systems are already being used, and the likely intent behind building one, that's a real risk if you're not careful.
- legitster 7mo agoSo I don't think I actually have a problem with businesses handing over their customer data if there is a valid warrant or subpoena. That's the system working as intended. The main crux of the problem here is that the DHS has been granted a wide berth by congress to issue administrative subpoenas - i.e. not reviewed by a real judge and not directed at criminals. In "good" times this made investigations run smoothly. But the reality now is that ICE is doing wide dragnets to make arrests without any judicial oversight and often hostile to habeas corpus. (Also, my understanding is that when banking is involved, it may also fall under the Banking Secrecy Act and Know Your Customer Rules - a whole other privacy nightmare.) I know we instinctively want to frame this as a privacy problem, but the real problem we need congress to act on is abolishing these "shadow" justice systems that agencies have been able to set up.
- crooked-v 7mo ago"Administrative subpoenas" have always been bullshit that mostly rely on there being no penalty for companies that hand over user information to anyone with a badge and then justify it with a five-hundred-page TOS document.
- linkregister 7mo agoGoogle, among most other tech companies, deny portions of administrative warrants. Here's a story about someone who was stressed out about their notification by Google (spoiler, Google decided to deny the government's request) https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2026/02/03/homeland-security-administrative-subpoena/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2026/02/03/hom... edit: It appears that this outcome is an outlier and most admin warrants are honored. It is unfortunate to see the Washington Post decline in reliability like this.
- legitster 7mo agoHence, why I wonder if this is specific their credit/banking products as part of Know Your Customer rules.
- xnx 7mo ago[flagged]
- wffurr 7mo agoNot actually a court order. That's the problem. Administrative subpoenas don't come from a judge, and the target wasn't given notice in order to challenge it in court.
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- JohnTHaller 7mo agoNo courts were involved
- lasgawe 7mo agoI remember someone saying that there is no privacy in large companies because they make money by selling or sharing users' personal data :/
- lingrush4 7mo agoGoogle ought to rethink its policy of disclosing government subpoenas to users. Every time this happens, the media uses it to attack Google. They'd be better off leaving users in the dark about these legally required data disclosures. Even if most users don't go crying to the media when it happens, it's still not worth it.
- jajuuka 7mo agoUltimately it's better for the public and users to be informed about this occurring though. If Google wanted to they could salvage it and explain their legal duties and how that applies to these situations. I don't think Google is worried though. They have multiple captive markets and have seen continued growth so it's obviously not affecting the bottom line. It's a good contrast to Apple where any bit of bad news that makes headlines becomes priority one to fix. Which just creates a privileged class of users and makes the brand look fragile.
- Hizonner 7mo agoEver occur to you that it's good for Google if there's some public visibility of what Google is being forced to do?
- 837263292029 7mo ago[flagged]
- JohnTHaller 7mo agoBiggest thing to note is that this was a so-called "administrative" warrant, not a real judicial warrant. Google did this voluntary.
- philipallstar 7mo agoThey're both real.
- RickJWagner 7mo agoWhen I was a student, I could never have gone to such lengths to avoid government scrutiny. He must have plenty of money.
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- yomansat 7mo agoWhat's the insinuation here? He has willpower towards injustice.
- mike_bob 7mo agoRemember "Don't be evil"? It's crazy anyone would trust a corporation with anything these days.
- tjwebbnorfolk 7mo agoIt's crazy that "corporations = bad" passes as insightful comment on HN these days.
- Upvoter33 7mo agoI don't think it's as simple as "corps. = bad". It's more that naive slogans like "don't be evil" used to be taken seriously. Companies exist to make money. This is ok! It generally works well in a capitalistic system. But to expect more than that people are realizing is a pipe dream... which is why you need good rules in place (i.e., regulations, laws) to direct companies and their behaviors.
- FrankBooth 7mo agoNot really. HN had its Eternal September moment years ago.
- pedroma 7mo agoI don't know why I still lurk on what is essentially r/politicsandtech.
- tunapizza 7mo agohttps://archive.ph/e4DY7 https://archive.ph/e4DY7
- diggyhole 7mo ago[flagged]
- 789bc7wassad 7mo ago[dead]
- cvhc 7mo agoGoogle discloses stats about government requests via FISA / National Security Letters: https://transparencyreport.google.com/user-data/us-national-security?hl=en https://transparencyreport.google.com/user-data/us-national-... I was in one of these published NSLs issued by FBI a few years ago. I was notified by Google after the nondisclosure period.
- garyfirestorm 7mo agocare to explain how you got added to it? what happened then? did you fight it?
- cvhc 7mo agoSee the other comment. > did you fight it? I talked to university lawyers (and LLMs) regarding another issue with DHS. For the sake of national security, they have the legal authority. There isn't much I can do. Unless I can prove they discriminated against me due to my race, national origin, etc. -- which may be the case but how can I prove that. I requested FOIA from DOS/DHS. What I got was basically no more than the original applications I submitted.
- edm0nd 7mo agoWhat did you get the NSL for? Did it result in you being raided? Were you ever indicted or convicted of anything?
- cvhc 7mo agoI dunno. Maybe because I used to do research at a Chinese lab when I was a student? That was my impression when I was once questioned for many hours by DHS at the airport. It's impossible to get an answer. They are granted broad legal authority to screen foreign nationals. No indictment. Nothing physical. But a lot of headaches like delays in visa/immigrant application :shrug:
- sneak 7mo agoIt was obviously such a credible threat that they couldn’t get a judge to sign a real warrant and had to do a warrantless fishing expedition.
- farceSpherule 7mo ago[dead]
- shevy-java 7mo ago[flagged]
- FpUser 7mo ago[flagged]
- tomhow 7mo agoPlease don't fulminate or advocate violence here. HN is not the place for this kind of rhetoric. You may not owe federal government agents better, but you owe the HN community better if you want to participate here. We've had to ask you many times to observe the guidelines. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- deaux 7mo agoThen what place is? Genuine question. It seems like not a single such place remains, intentionally, as the owners of all these places decided in their group Whatsapp chat when it turned out the majority of the population rightly understood the United Healthcare case was a net positive to society. While of course turning a blind eye to the exact same rhetoric when "ICE Agent" is ctrl+r'ed by "Russian soldier".
- tomhow 7mo ago> While of course turning a blind eye to the exact same rhetoric when "ICE Agent" is ctrl+r'ed by "Russian soldier". We make a point of not moderating HN in that way. The guidelines are clear that HN is for curious conversation not waging battle, and idealizing violence is never OK here, no matter the nationality of the imagined target. We consider this important because we want this to be a place where people from all countries can participate in discussions as individuals and not feel threatened with violence because of where they were born.
- dmix 7mo agoFor more context see the Cornell article from last year > The first email, sent on May 8 from Cornell International Services, stated that his immigration status had been terminated by the federal government. The second email, sent from Google on the same day, notified him that his personal email account had been subject to a subpoena by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security on March 31. https://www.cornellsun.com/article/2025/11/immigration-authorities-subpoenaed-amandla-thomas-johnson-s-personal-email-now-he-says-cornell-is-refusing-to-tell-him-if-his-school-account-was-also-breached https://www.cornellsun.com/article/2025/11/immigration-autho... Basically he was a British national with a student visa who was going to be deported for pro-palestian activism (under Trumps executive order mandating immigration authorities to do so), so he self-deported. Other's mention in the thread it's not clear if Google handed over any information.
- throwaway613746 7mo ago[dead]
- fourseventy 7mo ago[flagged]
- philipallstar 7mo agoWell, yes.
- tamimio 7mo ago> on tech companies to resist similar subpoenas in the future from DHS without court intervention. Haha nice one, these tech companies are willing to have a deal with devil to get those lucrative Gov contracts, and since it’s the the wild west now in the US, the only action users can do is abandoning all these tech companies and look for alternatives.
- jsrozner 7mo ago"full extent of the information...including any IP masking services" This suggests that Google aggregates derived information based on how a user uses Google (i.e. VPN info). The fact that derived info was also potentially passed along is particularly upsetting to me. Aside from the fact that I don't think companies should be able to collect user data at all (if you disagree, I think there's a good chance you're at least a little bit fascist), this amounts to Google providing free surveillance services to the government. If you squint, it's minority-report-esque: eventually Google will tell the govt who it thinks is likely to commit crimes based on how they interact with its AIs. Almost certainly coming to a society near you soon.
- dev_l1x_be 7mo agoCentralised bank system, centralised internet, centralised power. What could possibly go wrong?
- urbandw311er 7mo agoThe title should be Google handed _over_ these things. Otherwise it reads as though they were handed _to_ Google.
- mmooss 7mo agoIt's both: The user handed them to Google, Google handed them to the government.
- direwolf20 7mo agoI couldn't figure out what an ICE student journalist was.
- TacticalCoder 7mo ago> executive orders targeting students who protested in support of Palestinians, Thomas-Johnson and his friend Momodou Taal went into hiding Ah. They went into hiding. That explains why there are very few pro-Iran protests: for a second I thought there were double-standards when it came to protesting and that that was why we had non-stop pro-Gaza protests but hardly any protests to criticize the tens of thousands of victims the islamist iranian regime made in a few days. > “As a journalist, what’s weird is that you’re so used to seeing things from the outside,” said Thomas-Johnson, whose work has appeared in outlets including Al Jazeera and The Guardian. Where can I read the entirety of her work: that is, including her coverage of the tens of thousands of civilians executed by the islamist iranian regime? For you're not telling she's not covering those because the islamist iranian regime happens to be pro-Hamas and anti-jews right? (btw I'm not jewish) Right?
- earthtograndma 7mo agoWhy change the title? "Google Fulfilled ICE Subpoena Demanding Student Journalist’s Bank and Credit Card Numbers" https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- relaxing 7mo agoAgreed. The way it’s written now sound weird.
- xyst 7mo agoJust a thought, maybe the poster was using original title but source later updated it. https://web.archive.org/web/20260210171513/https://theintercept.com/2026/02/10/google-ice-subpoena-student-journalist/ https://web.archive.org/web/20260210171513/https://theinterc... -- "GOOGLE HANDED ICE STUDENT JOURNALIST’S BANK AND CREDIT CARD NUMBERS"
- heraldgeezer 7mo ago[flagged]
- tomhow 7mo agoPlease don't post low-substance comments like this on HN. The guidelines make it clear we're trying for something better here. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- kmfrk 7mo agoWhat I'm curious about is whether this payment information is from spending money or from YouTube's requirement of doing a symbolic credit card payment to authenticate that you're an adult - and other potential checks for YouTube partners. Basically YouTube's form of age verification that takes place such as when they can't figure out whether to serve you mature videos or not.
- cebert 7mo agoPlease don’t forget to upload your driver’s license and ID for validations to keep the children safe!
- tntxtnt 7mo agoVery much this. We need to keep children safe from those predators that the government are trying their best to protect!!!
- iAMkenough 7mo agoWhat are the prediction markets putting on a 6-3 SCOTUS ruling that the First Amendment only protects the freedom of speech, not the freedom of reach.
- quantum_state 7mo ago[flagged]
- jimt1234 7mo agoWe, the America-hating liberals, have been warning about these "administrative subpoenas" for years, but we've always been blocked with "So, we're all gonna have wait for a judge to sign a warrant before we can stop the next 9/11?!"
- mlmonkey 7mo ago> In the subpoena, ICE requests that Google not “disclose the existence of this summons for indefinite period of time.” And they expect Google to pass it on to these people?
- xannabxlle 7mo agoGlad to know Google is doing this. I am switching from brave search to Google from now on.
- EchoReflection 7mo agohttps://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-intercept/ https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-intercept/ "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. Overall, we rate The Intercept progressive Left Biased based on story selection that routinely favors the left. We also rate them as Mostly Factual in reporting rather than High due to previous fabricated work and censorship of writers." https://profrjstarr.com/the-psychology-of-us/the-need-to-be-offended-a-psychological-look-at-outrage-culture https://profrjstarr.com/the-psychology-of-us/the-need-to-be-... https://theconversation.com/outrage-culture-is-a-big-toxic-problem-why-do-we-take-part-and-how-can-we-stop-223645 https://theconversation.com/outrage-culture-is-a-big-toxic-p... https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/12/social-media-democracy/600763/ https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/12/social-... https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-atlantic/ https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-atlantic/ ↑ "These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. Overall, we rate The Atlantic Left-Center Biased due to editorial positions and High for factual reporting based on excellent sourcing of information and a clean fact check record." NYT headline: "lowest murder rate in 100 years, nobody really knows why" https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/01/23/murder-rates-plummeted-last-year-yet-media-refuse-to-give-trump-credit/ https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/01/23/murder-rates-plummete... "But the outrage of blaming conservatives and Trump for all the problems that society has makes me, personally, feel so good about how 'smart' and 'civilized' I am compared to all those 'Nazi' Republicans!!! No, I'm not addicted to outage and feelings of moral superiority, I just trust that the 'mainstream media' is trying to reveal 'the truth™'!" https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/11/26/assassins-creed-breaking-down-the-lefts-climate-of-violence/ https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/11/26/assassins-creed-break...
- partomniscient 7mo agoThe USA, land of the free^H^H^H^H surveilled.