lingrush4

6 ms·

1.
by lingrush4 7mo ago
After reading the examples, I trust Zuckerberg more than the author of this article. And that's a really low bar. The evidence for Zuckerberg lying here is flimsy at best. It's almost like the author doesn't know what lying e
2.
by lingrush4 7mo ago
Socialism never took off in America because Americans know that disincentivizing work shrinks the economy and makes everyone poorer.
3.
by lingrush4 7mo ago
Your PM most definitely would not tell you to skip a feature that is needed for your emails to be delivered to Gmail accounts. What a preposterous thing to lie about.
4.
by lingrush4 7mo ago
Closing a small patch of airspace while military activity is occurring is not authoritarianism. Get a grip you lunatic
5.
by lingrush4 7mo ago
Trump needs to be impeached immediately for this. How dare he close airspace and then just lift that closure once the danger has passed.
6.
by lingrush4 7mo ago
Google ought to rethink its policy of disclosing government subpoenas to users. Every time this happens, the media uses it to attack Google. They'd be better off leaving users in the dark about these legally required data disclosures.
7.
by lingrush4 7mo ago
That would solve exactly zero of the complaints surfaced in this lawsuit. Companies still have an incentive to maximize app usage regardless of whether the advertising is personalized.
8.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
In fairness, AI-generated CSAM is nowhere near as evil as real CSAM. The reason why possession of CSAM was such a serious crime is because its creation used to necessitate the abuse of a child. It's pretty obvious the French are delibe
9.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
Grok does try to prevent it. They even publicly publish their safety prompt. It clearly shows they have disallowed the system from assisting with queries that create child sexual abuse material. The fact that users have found ways to hack a
10.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
Are you illiterate? The comment I was replied to said X should be banned for trying to manipulate public opinion. It said nothing about CSAM.
11.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
Every AI system is capable of generating CSAM and deep fakes if requested by a savvy user. The only thing this proves is that you can't upset the French government or they'll go on a fishing expedition through your office praying
12.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
Reddit and BlueSky would be the first to go if that were actually the criteria for banning a platform.
13.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
Maybe ten comments below you there is someone stating "environmental regulations are a win." No qualifiers whatsoever. All environmental regulations are good as far as this person is concerned.
14.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
Not sure why the title was editorialized, but this is literally just one person's opinion. The title makes it sound like the legal community universally agrees, which is not true.
15.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
$45 pays for the cost of a much more tedious identity verification process.
16.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
The author never really argued for anything. He's just whining
17.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
No idea why the poster wants to deprive this author of engagement on his post, but here's the original link: https://x.com/karpathy/status/2015883857489522876
18.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
Freedom of speech has literally never prevented a private company from controlling the content on its platform.
19.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
Nothing. These apps are mental poison. They're designed to be addictive. Healthy adults don't use TikTok or any equivalent.
20.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
And you think they won't be used against me if I don't help build them? Seems unlikely. If the implication is that the tools won't exist if I don't build them, that's beyond a pipe dream. We'll never get a glob
21.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
3.5% forcing their preferences on all the others is obviously anti-democratic. Unless you don't know what democracy means
22.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
Because innocent people are dying and western governments are capable of intervening but choose not to. Your line of argument is an interesting one though. You're tacitly admitting that western protesters don't actually care about
23.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
Nobody in the west actually cares about injustice. They just pretend to care when it's politically convenient. Unfortunately, ABC and NBC haven't found a way to blame Trump for what's happening in Iran. Highlighting the atroc
24.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
Europe needs to roll back all of the socialism if it wants to compete with the US and China. European tech is never going to keep pace if the people who build it only work 35 hours a week and take a year of paternity leave every time they h
25.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
Very different phrasing between the headline and the subtitle: > Microsoft confirms it will give the FBI your Windows PC data encryption key if asked > Microsoft says it will hand those over to the FBI if requested via legal order Mic
26.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
Talk about a pipe dream. This is a far less significant penalty than what has been applied to Russia and absolutely nothing has happened to Putin. Europe could apply all the same sanctions to the US that it has applied to Russia and Trump w
27.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
No, it's pure symbolism. Countries don't purchase US treasuries to be charitable to the US. This hurts Denmark just as much as it hurts the US. And in relative terms, Denmark is going to feel the pain from this way more than the U
28.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
The fact that they don't have an agenda written into their charter doesn't mean they don't have an agenda. Basically every American news organization is an example of this.
29.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
[flagged]
30.
by lingrush4 8mo ago
You have to love when the media describes something as "shadowy." They're not even trying to hide their bias.

More ›