Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
godelski
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
godelski
4d ago
I don't think anyone is using "autocomplete" in the way your phone does it. But it is shorthand for a much more sophisticated version that is built in similar ideas. And autoregressive models certainly have that in their core
2.
▲
by
godelski
4d ago
On top of that, the only time they would get to think, about anything, is when prompted. That is, if we're following the same logic.
3.
▲
by
godelski
4d ago
I think people have more passion to argue than they have passion to learn. Probably doesn't help that SV culture tells people to hustle so hard that they don't have time to think. Gotta go fast?
4.
▲
by
godelski
4d ago
> humans commit logical mistakes at notable rates You're talking past the parent's claim. If your axioms are wrong then of course your logic will be wrong. But then again, maybe to support your point people frequently s
5.
▲
by
godelski
4d ago
FYI, math is a language. Which is actually an important part of the Navier-Stokes conversation. Solving hard problems expands the vocabulary. The problems are hard, illustrating a region we know where the language is insufficient. So the po
6.
▲
by
godelski
4d ago
> LLMs need to stay carefully contained, and if they're ever breaking the guardrails put around them, they're misaligned Good thing Claude Code can't set `dangerouslyDisableSandbox: true` on its own... Good thing t
7.
▲
by
godelski
5d ago
K
8.
▲
by
godelski
5d ago
There's nothing wrong with that. Everyone has their own vimrc, you do you. But most people don't know about <C-[>, which works across your terminal, It isn't just a vim thing.
9.
▲
by
godelski
5d ago
A lot has changed, but a lot of features have been there for a long time too. There's a reason people use neovim too > It's a persistent panel that allows you to navigate within the project. Trivial to do with netrw. Aga
10.
▲
by
godelski
5d ago
> Can this be done out-of-the-box now? It always could be. Go into vim and type `let g:netrw_liststyle = 3` then `:Vex`. The window size won't be what you want, but is the core idea? Because if it is, you just set the listst
11.
▲
by
godelski
5d ago
Mouse support and filetrees are included in both vim and emacs. The batteries are already included and have been for essentially ever
12.
▲
by
godelski
5d ago
He said the same about vim, but did everyone forget about netrw? Here, go into vim and type `:Ex`. You can also have mouse support. (Netrw can also do trees if you don't like the format, go look at `g:netrw_liststyle`) My friend on eMa
13.
▲
by
godelski
6d ago
I'm also confused why everyone is so much more afraid of that than... say... a group of terrorists dumping millions of nails into a few major highways across the country. Easy to pull off, doesn't require coordination, cheap, caus
14.
▲
by
godelski
6d ago
I think the reason people are suspicious is that OAI has shown itself to act a bit irresponsibly, especially recently. As two examples, of course it was artifactory, why wasn't that watched more closely, especially after the first inst
15.
▲
by
godelski
6d ago
They aren't even consistent within manufacturer! They're standardized on the device side, but not the PSU side. So always check pinout before you make the very reasonable assumption that if it fits it works
16.
▲
by
godelski
6d ago
I put my cables in bags then in a box. I can't tell you how helpful the bags are. It only took me like an hour to sort the first time. But it's already saved me hours only a year later. Those 5 minutes of searching add up. Just fi
17.
▲
by
godelski
6d ago
I find that if people don't dogfood their software the software just ends up being shit. As engineers we need to be a little grumpy. Frustrating with our software provide directions to improve it. If we're not grumpy, we don'
18.
▲
by
godelski
7d ago
> I agree they they should, but that would be hard before, ... seems like a herculean effort. | We choose to go to the Moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard; because tha
19.
▲
by
godelski
7d ago
> Anything broadcasts signal is blue VPN is blue in the radio box but not if you put it in the main menu. I'd also claim that a VPN doesn't broadcast OTOH personal hotspot, which does broadcast, is white. I think the di
20.
▲
by
godelski
8d ago
I'd claim it is a bit worse. They use dark patterns here. You can see in another sibling's comment that we disagree on this but I think Apple is teaching the user the wrong thing. And I agree with you that actually disabling is co
21.
▲
by
godelski
8d ago
> In iOS, a toggle is also different from a button. Yet they're all circles > They added clear messaging And it's common to put pull/push signs on doors. That doesn't fix design. > Sorry to di
22.
▲
by
godelski
9d ago
For the sideways toggle switches, the usual single line. For the buttons when you pull down the menu, literally any physical change would help, not just color and a message. Highlight the circular edge and make it work like a count down. Ma
23.
▲
by
godelski
9d ago
The answer isn't an "or" it is an "and". But in a {mono,oligo}polistic setting companies typically get lazy. > Take a look at any mature software product For most companies that have cornered the market, t
24.
▲
by
godelski
9d ago
Norman Doors. Good design communicates even without language. It is reasonable to see a toggle switch and think it... you know... toggles. The same reason you see a handle on a door a pill before you read the sign that says push. The sign i
25.
▲
by
godelski
9d ago
Easy to forget, judges determine the legality of things. It is literally their job
26.
▲
by
godelski
9d ago
Someone needs to find out. Presumably by the TOS it's in the settings, so verifiable
27.
▲
by
godelski
9d ago
IANAL, but I believe the argument is that agreeing to the TOS constitutes consent. Even though no reasonable person would believe such a thing would be in the TOS and no reasonable person reads the full TOS (no person actually could...). Pe
28.
▲
by
godelski
9d ago
You seem to be making the assumption that this is all a zero sum game. I have to point out the irony that this is a technology based site, focused on software. You know, a sector that isn't nearly as tied to physical resources as other
29.
▲
by
godelski
9d ago
> Seems pretty logical, no? Not really, it's incredibly myopic. Would you really risk your brand , that took decades to build, by acting hostile to your customers? It only "makes sense" to do when you no longer
30.
▲
by
godelski
9d ago
> There *has* to be some complex math involved. My partner, who has a doctorate in economics, and I end up talking about this a lot because I agree that doing nothing , as a monopoly, is the winning move for consumers. Related I
More ›