ImPostingOnHN

6 ms·

1.
by ImPostingOnHN 4d ago
It's so weird how all your posts show absolutely no consideration or praise for anyone except Matt. Like everyone else in the world is an NPC whose perspective can be ignored or overruled by this one dude.
2.
by ImPostingOnHN 5d ago
that seems reasonable, as it is the lowest common denominator for interoperability what would be unfortunate is if it was in some format that couldn't be used by most other systems without extra work, and if the user wasn't able t
3.
by ImPostingOnHN 5d ago
> Why do I need a source? Because your entire post is a personal, philosophic opinion on what words should mean, and how if someone disagrees with this personal opinion of 1/7,000,000,000 of people, then they are wrong. Every sing
4.
by ImPostingOnHN 5d ago
I guess you could call capitalism a conspiracy theory if you want, but it doesn't change the fact that, yes, it exists.
5.
by ImPostingOnHN 6d ago
The truth is likely that without the tool or the humans using it, the process would have taken longer
6.
by ImPostingOnHN 6d ago
Surely some understanding of the lean proof is required, to make sure it proves what it claims to prove. Otherwise, what happens if the LLM includes an underhanded addition to the lean code which leads it to output a false positive?
7.
by ImPostingOnHN 6d ago
You are simply incorrect. It is not a fallacy of that type, or any other type, because the words do, in fact, mean the same thing, as multiple people have pointed out here. Whether referring to chatbots or people, "prompt" means &
8.
by ImPostingOnHN 6d ago
They used words to mean what the words mean. What specific issue do you take with that? "prompt", as in prompting an AI, has the same definition as "prompt", as in prompting a person. They mean the same thing, that'
9.
by ImPostingOnHN 8d ago
The researcher could share a string from one of their conversations and OpenAI can confirm whether it exists in their training data. Or OpenAI could just look at their code and say what it does (maybe have their AI do it if they're hav
10.
by ImPostingOnHN 8d ago
anthropic has nothing to do with it
11.
by ImPostingOnHN 8d ago
> There is a caveat that they "can't rule out" the possibility that Tristan's Codex data could have been part of the training set of the new model, though it is described as "unlikely" This is the lynchpin
12.
by ImPostingOnHN 8d ago
Whether they opted out would help assess the degree of wrongdoing, but regardless, using their own data to try to scoop them is unethical.
13.
by ImPostingOnHN 8d ago
You seem to jump over the principal issue of whether any data from the researchers used to train or otherwise affect the model which produced the OpenAI proof. We can judge for ourselves the impact and degree of that wrongdoing, but it seem
14.
by ImPostingOnHN 15d ago
sometimes people share a problem and want solutions or workarounds other times people share a problem and just want to feel validated ( "yeah that sucks dude" ) it sounds like you wanted the 2nd but got the 1st
15.
by ImPostingOnHN 17d ago
> Solar panels (which only generate electricity; energy use is much bigger than just electricity) require materials like cobalt, which is mined (partially using child slavery) in Africa (DRC) in ecologically devastating ways (since you
16.
by ImPostingOnHN 18d ago
I think you responded to the wrong post. Try going to your link to respond to a post about your link. Back to this topic: have you yet considered the possibility that people might simply have different views from you on what constitutes unr
17.
by ImPostingOnHN 19d ago
Yeah, I didn't get this part: > Hah! I don't have to worry about this! I got Linux! For now.. That's true. But EDID transmission still happens EDID transmission is how monitors communicate their specs to the computer, ho
18.
by ImPostingOnHN 19d ago
> These antisemitic conspiracy theories predate Israel being a country. Swapping out Jews for Israeli Jews or Jews that support the existence of Israel in statements doesn't negate the statement being fundamentally rooted in an ant
19.
by ImPostingOnHN 19d ago
The trump administration has a long track record of doing illegal things that were struck down in countless courts across the country, so the more likely scenario is that this is yet another mark on that record. This isn't even the fir
20.
by ImPostingOnHN 19d ago
hello brand new HN poster, you're adorable let's be friends, I can be your first one here :)
21.
by ImPostingOnHN 20d ago
You and I being minorities is not relevant to whether the elmu-condoned nazi death threats on twitter have made it more or less toxic than it was before. What some other random social media site did or does is not relevant to whether the el
22.
by ImPostingOnHN 20d ago
We were discussing right-wing death threats on X, and you tried to distract by bringing up something else, somewhere else. You are free to continue condoning nazi death threats towards minorities on twitter since elmu started allowing it, b
23.
by ImPostingOnHN 20d ago
Maybe, maybe not. I don't use BlueSky, are there often people there threatening racially-based killings, with the reporters getting banned? That is the worst for sure. Seems like a tangent either way: letting violent right-wing nazis d
24.
by ImPostingOnHN 20d ago
> Allowing more voices on the platform might've made it more toxic (who knows - you're not the judge of toxic) Allowing the nazi voices definitely did. And while that dude isn't the judge of what is toxic, a majority of
25.
by ImPostingOnHN 20d ago
You're right, that is always a possibility for any random thing. Okay, done. Now you do the same.
26.
by ImPostingOnHN 21d ago
The legal perspective doesn't preclude that the cruelty is the point.
27.
by ImPostingOnHN 21d ago
The property owner in this case is the American people, who I'm pretty sure don't support this. They may have hired a property manager, but if the manager goes rogue, what the owners say is more important.
28.
by ImPostingOnHN 21d ago
The agents discovered the vulnerability, but they are not necessary for a virtualized workload to exploit them. This is more a story of how VMs won't reliably contain a malicious workload, and the story was exposed via agents.
29.
by ImPostingOnHN 22d ago
Nobody is calling half the country morons except maybe the president (more than half, actually). I agree that it is not a good or sincere starting point for debate.
30.
by ImPostingOnHN 22d ago
There is simply not anything in their post which says what you said ( So, you consider anyone with a job "powerful"? ). If paraphrasing is a hurdle, keep in mind it isn't necessary, you can just respond to their own wording o

More ›