throwpoaster

6 ms·

1.
by throwpoaster 2mo ago
A null transform is a transform. Engage seriously with the project and OP will deliver.
2.
by throwpoaster 2mo ago
> the fact that the entire economy is betting everything on it This is untrue. Spend is about 2% of GDP.
3.
by throwpoaster 2mo ago
Could be a great buying opportunity depending on your theory of investment.
4.
by throwpoaster 2mo ago
Chop wood. Carry water.
5.
by throwpoaster 2mo ago
With or without AC?
6.
by throwpoaster 3mo ago
Looks awesome!
7.
by throwpoaster 3mo ago
Hear perhaps here: https://youtu.be/wk-sIeh7BcI?si=188fGFMD_f3DrkXP
8.
by throwpoaster 3mo ago
Perhaps here: https://youtu.be/wk-sIeh7BcI?si=188fGFMD_f3DrkXP
9.
by throwpoaster 3mo ago
The steel man is that you can’t peer review your way to breakthroughs that change consensus, because peer review relies on consensus, so peer review has to be made subordinate to accountable decision makers.
10.
by throwpoaster 3mo ago
NNNOOO000ooo...…
11.
by throwpoaster 3mo ago
This (re-)triggered a huge (dormant?) mechanical watch special interest for me when it was first posted. Neurospiceys tread carefully. <3
12.
by throwpoaster 3mo ago
Nice, I once built a ray tracer without using an SQL database.
13.
by throwpoaster 4mo ago
Maybe we changed the rules so that our capital markets can protect our champions from large Chinese buy pressure at lower post-IPO valuations. Plus, these companies have probably had to demonstrate earnings stability (yes, unaudited) in ord
14.
by throwpoaster 4mo ago
No, the technical opinion. MCP is an interesting integration pattern. Calling it "more APIs" is like calling software "just some code". It's true, not interesting.
15.
by throwpoaster 4mo ago
I suggest you implement an MCP server before adopting this as a firm technical opinion.
16.
by throwpoaster 4mo ago
Protip: asks need to be simple. This is cool, but long: "congratulations, or sorry, but I'm not reading that". If they had a "preorder" button at the top I would give them money and be done with it.
17.
by throwpoaster 4mo ago
Pass. Hate is never good.
18.
by throwpoaster 4mo ago
“Post hoc, ergo propter hoc.”
19.
by throwpoaster 4mo ago
Because the l on your keyboard is broken?
20.
by throwpoaster 5mo ago
Autism is a hell of a drug.
21.
by throwpoaster 5mo ago
Interesting that Baumol's Cost Disease might have missed that non-productive wage increases might actually swamp productive wages. If we assume that services jobs will be, primarily, the jobs that survive automation, the cost disease m
22.
by throwpoaster 5mo ago
I value correctness in my argumentation, not popularity. What part of it don’t you understand?
23.
by throwpoaster 5mo ago
Yes, although as the Koch Brothers point out in their book: you have to play by the rules that exist, not the rules you want. If you read, eg, Buffet, he makes the point that a manager donating to a political cause, whether the Heritage Fou
24.
by throwpoaster 5mo ago
Legal agreements are explicit.
25.
by throwpoaster 5mo ago
What kind of model "reproduce"s things later for profit that is not generative?
26.
by throwpoaster 5mo ago
That's not what the Friedman Doctrine is, technically. It is that management should obey moral, ethical, and legal frameworks in the operation of the business for the benefit of its investors; and specifically NOT take actions which ar
27.
by throwpoaster 5mo ago
Booo, nihilism is dumb.
28.
by throwpoaster 5mo ago
One important researcher fabricated data that directed too much funding to the amyloid hypothesis. Next question.
29.
by throwpoaster 5mo ago
Seems related to the explore/exploit problem, where the standard answer is related to the answer to the Secretary Problem[0], with the important caveat that it depends on whether "passing" on an opportunity legitimately makes
30.
by throwpoaster 5mo ago
I recommend running this by legal if you are funded, however, I am not a lawyer.

More ›