Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
deaux
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
deaux
4d ago
I now did, so they were. Sue me for having a semblance of a life outside of HN.
2.
▲
by
deaux
4d ago
Lyft, DiDi, Bolt difference is about 0 in most locales. KakaoT is by definition 0. Your list is wildly outdated in the first place because half of them don't have Uber as competitor anymore because it left the market. In the above case
3.
▲
by
deaux
4d ago
> all that will be left, right That assumption is wildly different from you losing your cushy software job. The large majority of US jobs are neither cushy software jobs, nor grueling manual labor.
4.
▲
by
deaux
4d ago
You're gonna stop here, being responding only the least relevant part of my comment, because the rest can't be argued with.
5.
▲
by
deaux
4d ago
No, that's not how the DOJ picks what to work on. They did not work on indictments of James Comey and Letitia James because someone wrote district attorneys.
6.
▲
by
deaux
4d ago
Because they're part of the US regime.
7.
▲
by
deaux
4d ago
Good luck setting loose a hungry tiger on Times Square and then arguing to the judge "well nobody got harmed". We'll see how it goes. That's the relevant analogy here.
8.
▲
by
deaux
4d ago
Ah yes, such nutball countries who have apparently been on the cusp for 30 years. Wild definition of cusp for sure.
9.
▲
by
deaux
4d ago
I wonder if this depends a lot on location? Or a Facebook thing rather than Meta-wide, though I think they don't actually let you distinguish when running ads? Until last year I used Instagram and most of the ads I got were actually re
10.
▲
by
deaux
6d ago
How is life at Google nowadays? Oh you said 500, not 5000, my bad.
11.
▲
by
deaux
6d ago
I'm not the person you were replying to, but yes. Let me show you the issue. "Why is half the site blue now? I asked you to change one button."; half the site isn't blue, why would you say that? What would "half the
12.
▲
by
deaux
7d ago
Not at all.
13.
▲
by
deaux
7d ago
The annoying there here isn't Claude, it's the "human". "It's not X but Y"-satire not intended. It was annoying to be forced to send such dumb replies. Half the site isn't blue, why would I say that?
14.
▲
by
deaux
7d ago
Sergey also needs another few billion to spend on lobbying against the billionaire taxes.
15.
▲
by
deaux
7d ago
> "But they can't possibly review every ad before publishing" they say. If that's the case It's not, it never is; it's a lie on the level of "Poland attacked first". Say, if someone was offering yo
16.
▲
by
deaux
7d ago
> The fact that we're allowing companies to get away with bullshit like this is ludicrous to me Hope you're not voting for any parties that don't explicitly run on a platform of stopping companies getting away with bullshi
17.
▲
by
deaux
7d ago
No. These companies have correctly figured out that it's much cheaper to buy out governments so they won't actually punish them for all the regulations they break or institute new such regulations. That's the weird timeline w
18.
▲
by
deaux
7d ago
> This is the key to the problem that I think people are missing, possibly because they kind of want to miss it. Google and the other companies hiding behind LLMs and primarily doing it because they can't operate at the scale they d
19.
▲
by
deaux
7d ago
> How are your rights being violated? Surveillance capitalism. > I'm sure you have a solid and thought-out answer that justifies such a casual attitude towards violence. The ones with a casual attitude towards violence are those
20.
▲
by
deaux
7d ago
What's your point? If someone murders your family in cold blood "with an ideal" and they "see themselves as good", for example because they believe your family consists of infidels, does that make a difference? In a
21.
▲
by
deaux
7d ago
Any reasonable person would interpret the original comment as the "generic you" rather than the "second person you", but nice save.
22.
▲
by
deaux
8d ago
> write an English paragraph that doesn't make me want to claw my eyes out. LLMs are very much capable of that. Your belief in the opposite has two causes. Firstly the toupee fallacy. You don't notice LLM written text that does
23.
▲
by
deaux
8d ago
Right, I assume tomorrow you'll be applying for the next Nazi camp guard vacancy? After all, if you don't do it, someone with less scruples likely will.
24.
▲
by
deaux
8d ago
> most scientists working on this really want to see and experience it. We used to call these people doomsday cultists and made sure to ostracize them from society.
25.
▲
by
deaux
8d ago
If I don't get accepted into art school, I might as well exterminate a few ethnicities. Actually, yours seems worse. Bringing about "the end of all professions" sounds like you're talking about ending humanity.
26.
▲
by
deaux
8d ago
Explain why? How does live being worth living binarily depend on having a cushy software job?
27.
▲
by
deaux
9d ago
> You can't just commit crimes on the open internet without really hiding IPs and what not, and expect that to not come back to haunt you eventually. Not sure what you're talking about, the current AI boom is entirely based on
28.
▲
by
deaux
14d ago
This too isn't true. Most of the services you listed only operate in one (or at most a small few) countries. I know for a fact that in some of them, Uber is not the highest price. Instead, in some of them, Uber and the ones you liste
29.
▲
by
deaux
14d ago
A good majority of the Americans want Epstein's best buddies' jailed, instead the POTUS is one.
30.
▲
by
deaux
14d ago
> by saying things like terrorism is in the eye of the beholder This is so trivially true that it's not worth bringing up in discussoon with anyone who can be taken seriously. It's true for any politically charged word, and ter
More ›