Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dataflow
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
dataflow
3d ago
Is this just his speculation? Or is there evidence for it?
2.
▲
by
dataflow
4d ago
Two questions: 1. How does the kernel detect the conflict? > you can certainly boot with acpi=off if you want to and no ACPI code will be executed at runtime 2. How does the kernel prevent the firmware from running anything?
3.
▲
by
dataflow
5d ago
Given the replacement author and email seem like a random person rather than an employee, I wonder if whomever did this thought they had found the "real" author and that somehow the others were incorrect? It's confusing, I do
4.
▲
by
dataflow
5d ago
> Not around since 2015 > "but retained it in the last sentence"
5.
▲
by
dataflow
5d ago
> The author history was harder to understand. An earlier package file listed Pierre-Louis Favreau, Jean-Pierre Lo, and Nicolas Dehandschoewercker. The version that replaced it removed all three names and substituted another author. The
6.
▲
by
dataflow
5d ago
> As in, if I meant to travel at 70 and was instead doing 100 it doesn’t matter that I sincerely meant not to speed and did not know I was speeding, I can still be convicted even if the judge believes I had no intent. IANAL but from what
7.
▲
by
dataflow
5d ago
> Winning the midterms would make the house speaker a democrat, which would allow for the removal of both the president and vice president via impeachment That's... not how it works. Democrats literally had a House speaker and the p
8.
▲
by
dataflow
5d ago
I'm not sure winning in the midterms will be a net positive for Democrats (barring an infeasible supermajority). Even if they stop everything Republicans want to do (which they won't even get close to), that's just going to b
9.
▲
by
dataflow
6d ago
Love this, that sounds awesome. Thanks for sharing!
10.
▲
by
dataflow
6d ago
I think I disagree. I just (re-)discovered a couple of my cables don't have data lines a few hours ago, prompted by the earlier discussion. My initial instinct was also to throw them away like you said. But then I realized they're
11.
▲
by
dataflow
6d ago
Whoops, thank, I can't read - I misread label maker as label marker!
12.
▲
by
dataflow
6d ago
Definitely not winning at life with this lol, it's actually frustrating because the cables are so similar. One has a higher speed, one has a higher power, one is shorter, one is longer, one is more flexible, one has a display showing
13.
▲
by
dataflow
6d ago
> One other suggestion I have is just buying a longer cable than you think you need because eventually you'll have the need for it anyway. This only works with cables that bend easily. For something stiff/sensitive like high sp
14.
▲
by
dataflow
6d ago
What marker do you use to mark them? Is the ink durable and easy to read?
15.
▲
by
dataflow
6d ago
That sounds hard. Is a USB-A-to-C cable in the A group or C group or neither? What about the inverse? What about cables that only do data but can't transmit enough power? What about cables that are slow but high power? What about thick
16.
▲
by
dataflow
6d ago
I suspect the fundamental problem here is it's hard (if not impossible) to determine if someone who tried the winning approach deserves the credit for the discovery, because there's always the chance that they could've done s
17.
▲
by
dataflow
6d ago
Has anyone else seen this happen? I checked and my setting is still off.
18.
▲
by
dataflow
7d ago
> Rather than this being too good at solving this class of problem, it seems to me that zero-initialization is the wrong approach That's exactly why I wrote this here: >> I'm obviously not saying we should write unsafe co
19.
▲
by
dataflow
7d ago
Here's a trivial example to illustrate: class User { explicit User(const char* name) { if (!look_up_uid(&uid, name)) { abort(); } } bool is_root() const { return uid == 0; } int uid
20.
▲
by
dataflow
7d ago
> But in practice so far, this doesn't end vulnerabilities, it just leads to a bunch of new and more exciting ones. I kind of wish you wrote "potentially worse" rather than "exciting", because that happens too, a
21.
▲
by
dataflow
8d ago
Is blockchain going to finally be the solution to something? I'm only half joking. Should researchers perhaps put hashes of their attempts on a public blockchain tied to their own public keys, verify their claims asynchronously, and th
22.
▲
by
dataflow
9d ago
Wouldn't using a neighbor's Wi-Fi without anyone's permission or instruction violate CFAA or some other law? Also, wouldn't this be trivial to test by just setting up your own network and seeing if the TV connects?
23.
▲
by
dataflow
10d ago
Why don't they use the Mollweide projection instead?
24.
▲
by
dataflow
10d ago
Perhaps they're hoping to get significant market share before they lose the opportunity for good?
25.
▲
by
dataflow
12d ago
You don't seem to believe that something like generational wealth makes much of a difference?
26.
▲
by
dataflow
12d ago
It sounds insultingly low, yeah. I'm trying to imagine why they would pay so little. The only two reasons I can think of are either (a) they were already aware of it and fixing it, and therefore the report didn't really change muc
27.
▲
by
dataflow
12d ago
Neither I nor you should appreciate spreading unsubstantiated rumors that directly attack the public servants neither of us personally know. If it bothers you that I'm defending them, then perhaps don't launch your attacks on them
28.
▲
by
dataflow
12d ago
What alternative solutions would people who use a lot of aliases at their own domain name suggest?
29.
▲
by
dataflow
12d ago
I'm similarly confused/upset, but it really does sound like they're discontinuing sending via SMTP: > The “Send as” feature will no longer be available. This feature allows you to send email from a third-party address, suc
30.
▲
by
dataflow
12d ago
I don't understand, sorry. How does declaring an optional dependency in a toml file solve the problem of accessing the symbol in your code? Also, you need something that works for simple one-file scripts, not just a whole package or pr
More ›