BugsJustFindMe

6 ms·

1.
by BugsJustFindMe 3d ago
> The "not the thing I want you to respond to" part, I understand what you mean, but with some tinkering you could get it to match your usual typing/speech behaviours and cadence so that it doesn't start talking abou
2.
by BugsJustFindMe 4d ago
> No links to avoid my own embarrassment. There are only 7 posts in alt.music.bjork on the first date, and one of them has your name on it. There's 1 post with your name on the second date, and it gives a website. The earliest way
3.
by BugsJustFindMe 4d ago
"It's super obnoxious when humans interrupt me, but what if a computer did it too while also costing me money just so I could save one single keypress?" It's painful to contemplate how you thought this wasn't an abs
4.
by BugsJustFindMe 5d ago
> "I wonder how much of it comes from the clock speed bump (4.93 GHz from 4.26 GHz, +15.7%)" About 15.7%. > "If it were largely clock speed, I worry we'll find that thermal throttling makes these numbers only ge
5.
by BugsJustFindMe 6d ago
> "Information saturation also results in accidents, ..." Information saturation is another way of saying attention incapacity.
6.
by BugsJustFindMe 6d ago
I said favorable circumstance, not favorable conditions. I mean the person in front of you doesn't stop quickly or veer into your lane very often regardless of whether there is e.g. fog or some confusing signage. Knowing what to do in
7.
by BugsJustFindMe 6d ago
Why would I fail to include driving with untreated narcolepsy in my definition? > as a set of behaviors I think you're thinking about "set" and "behaviors" incorrectly here. The definition wouldn't need to
8.
by BugsJustFindMe 6d ago
I'm curious about your story!
9.
by BugsJustFindMe 6d ago
> How long do you sit in a bath? I'm an American and my answer is at least an hour, maybe more, depending on how I'm feeling. I usually listen to an audiobook. Baths are for hanging out and relaxing in.
10.
by BugsJustFindMe 7d ago
My primary concern is with your treatment of "unsafe" as meaning nothing less than "dead".
11.
by BugsJustFindMe 7d ago
Brought to you by the same madhouse as: The all potato diet that really does work: https://slimemoldtimemold.com/2022/07/12/lose-10-6-pounds-in... and The half-tato diet that doesn't really work: https:
12.
by BugsJustFindMe 7d ago
> "~5,500 person-years worth of driving between crashes" That's between fatalities , not between crashes. The reported injury rate is 62 times higher than the fatality rate, and the overall police-reported crash rate is
13.
by BugsJustFindMe 7d ago
The article uses robotaxis as its example self-driving group, but it's not an article about robot vs human taxis. It's an article about self-driving vs non-self-driving vehicles. The nice thing about a future where all cars are se
14.
by BugsJustFindMe 7d ago
Remember, I'm responding specifically to how good people are at driving, not how likely they are to die while driving. How likely a person is to die is mediated by all kinds of things that have nothing to do with how good they are as a
15.
by BugsJustFindMe 7d ago
1) What makes you think she has insurance coverage? 2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actuarial_science
16.
by BugsJustFindMe 7d ago
You cannot measure driver goodness (skill and vigilance) by looking at crash statistics, because crashes are definitively circumstantial. Most very clearly bad/dangerous/unskilled/unvigilant operations of automobiles do not l
17.
by BugsJustFindMe 7d ago
It's a category error to say that everyone else are good just because they're not the worst you can imagine. It doesn't matter what your worst 0.05% do. It doesn't make most people actually good drivers.
18.
by BugsJustFindMe 7d ago
> "The majority of drivers are good, but some drivers are really bad." I take issue with this. The majority of drivers are "mostly fine as long as circumstances are favorable", not "good". People for the m
19.
by BugsJustFindMe 10d ago
Don't worry. That's not why.
20.
by BugsJustFindMe 10d ago
Except for all the other ones.
21.
by BugsJustFindMe 14d ago
> " Researchers did not have access to participants' locations because the medical data had been de-identified. " Not even including the country is an unfortunate over-deidentification for something like this. It would hav
22.
by BugsJustFindMe 15d ago
Nobody who cares about UX adds virtual knobs to flat interfaces.
23.
by BugsJustFindMe 16d ago
The word "people" doesn't stop at the one person wearing the glasses. Don't pretend that Meta's corporate data governance decisions aren't also by people being assholes.
24.
by BugsJustFindMe 16d ago
What you're describing is not a Meta or a glasses problem. It's an asshole problem. IMO, devices should not be responsible for people not being assholes. People should. The glasses become significantly less useful as mobility aids
25.
by BugsJustFindMe 16d ago
For all the talk about Meta Ray-Ban glasses being used by creeps and assholes (no debate, they certainly are), the one anecdote I care most about is that a friend of mine who is blind absolutely loves his pair as a mobility aid. Things wort
26.
by BugsJustFindMe 16d ago
Meanwhile OpenAI resets everyone's weekly Codex limits back to 100% seemingly every other day as a kind of game.
27.
by BugsJustFindMe 17d ago
Speed Disk for Mac was even better because it used fun colors and _really_ showed things moving around. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUKvTe1q7CE
28.
by BugsJustFindMe 17d ago
This reminded me of PostSecret.
29.
by BugsJustFindMe 19d ago
tl;dr: Every minimum-wage supporter would actually be fine with the extremely reasonable position of paying everyone in proportion to the replaceability of their actual work and then letting businesses that don't know how to provide va
30.
by BugsJustFindMe 19d ago
Obnoxiously missing in this article, as in every fucking one of these goddamn articles, aside from a hyperlink to an original publication, is any comparison at all with the extremely-known cardiovascular harm caused by the sugar they replac

More ›