Hizonner

5 ms·

1.
by Hizonner 3d ago
> If Anthropic has all this data that Claude was being used by the Houthis to develop a missile guidance system, why the fuck did they allow it? I know it may be complicated for you to understand, but sometimes you find out about things
2.
by Hizonner 3d ago
Filming them at work, or following them to the next job so you can film them at work, is not in any way, shape, or form "harassment".
3.
by Hizonner 3d ago
Yes, they should be different. In almost all cases, they should be less. But what I really wanted to mention is that flock is not the government , and flock's services are not exclusively available to governments . Same goes for thei
4.
by Hizonner 4d ago
People who know what both of them are (hello) still won't know which one the headline is talking about. The circuit one is definitely older, probably has more users, and is just as relevant in this forum.
5.
by Hizonner 4d ago
> doesn't want me opening the console Whoa. That's not even something it should be able to detect. What's the gaping security hole that lets it do that?
6.
by Hizonner 4d ago
> The compile can transform your code if the result of the computations it makes is the same (plus any ordering guarantees you've encoded with the correct primitives, etc.). "Interact with the outside world in exactly the same
7.
by Hizonner 4d ago
The compiler is allowed to transform your code if it can prove that the result would interact with the outside world in exactly the same way as your original code would, right? You can optimize on "I already checked the value of X&qu
8.
by Hizonner 4d ago
Lack of access to take a bus or permission to walk anywhere is another form of the same disease.
9.
by Hizonner 4d ago
Starlink has 12 million subscribers, or about 0.14 percent of the population of Earth. In addition to paying for Starlink, those subscribers are externalizing costs to everybody else on Earth... for instance by screwing up radio astronomy.
10.
by Hizonner 5d ago
That might be dispositive if we didn't already have almost everybody on Earth wired up without using satellites.
11.
by Hizonner 5d ago
> I really wish we could leave these types of decisions up to parents and parents only. Leave the companies and governments out of it. You do understand that in order to do that, something or somebody has (a) know that the person being d
12.
by Hizonner 5d ago
I'm a parent. I care about children. That's why I hate this wave of hysteria cutting them off from everything. It's way more damaging to children , and especially to teenagers, than any of the stuff it's supposed to p
13.
by Hizonner 5d ago
It's not just Claude. It's being cut off from every part of society except a carefully curated "child ghetto". In which you stay until the day you turn 18. At which point you're shoved out into the outside world.
14.
by Hizonner 5d ago
Another example of AV doing serious damage to the people it claims to "help". Must be a day ending in 'y'.
15.
by Hizonner 5d ago
Is that supposed to be bad?
16.
by Hizonner 6d ago
By "open models", do you perhaps mean the approximately trillion-parameter open models that have been getting released recently? Because basically nobody can actually self-host those. And even at that size it's debatable that
17.
by Hizonner 7d ago
... and the advantage of the frontier models over anything you can possibly self-host continues to increase at an even more insane pace.
18.
by Hizonner 7d ago
Sure it is. The question is whether maybe some people need more stress.
19.
by Hizonner 7d ago
Getting an unjustified drug approval would not be "victimless".
20.
by Hizonner 9d ago
If it's legal, you can do it. Figuring out whether it's legal is a giant error-prone jurisdiction-dependent pain in the ass. Even if it were illegal, you could have done it by releasing anonymously (on edit, and reworking the co
21.
by Hizonner 13d ago
If your Google account is precious, you've already done something wrong...
22.
by Hizonner 14d ago
Yes, when a company dumps risks and costs onto its users, that sort of excuse is usually what we hear.
23.
by Hizonner 14d ago
> Every closed source software has the potential to centralize and lock you out of it. ... and you can write your own alternative software. But you can't provide your own 2TB GPU to help you (or to run it, if that's what it nee
24.
by Hizonner 15d ago
Seems kind of contrary to the point of a navigation device...
25.
by Hizonner 16d ago
Counting the cost of creating the company so you can actually deal directly with a NIC? Every. Single. Individual. End. User. Device. Should. Be. Addressable. Given that there are more such devices out there then there are IPv4 addresses to
26.
by Hizonner 16d ago
... and NAT was a big part of giving them the market power they now use to enforce that.
27.
by Hizonner 16d ago
I'm sorry, but a multi-kilogram (at a guess), five-figure-priced (at a conservative guess) device with kilometer-scale error (per their actual press release) is not a substitute for a GPS. And you probably can't improve on many of
28.
by Hizonner 16d ago
... because people (by which I mean software vendors who should have known better) irresponsibly failed to create secure systems for those average users to use. A whole lot of which came to be justified by "it'll be behind a fir
29.
by Hizonner 16d ago
> "No one wanting to bother with port forwarding" is largely a matter of shitty UX on the home gateway side and laziness on the side of the operator. Same with UPnP. If you try to use those port forwarding hacks, you force ever
30.
by Hizonner 16d ago
I was alive and don't think I've forgotten. What distinguished large from small users was the width of the pipe. Address space charging was never important as a revenue driver. There were some attempts to charge for address spac

More ›