10 ms·
The founder's playbook: Building an AI-native startup
- bflesch 3mo agoMaybe it's better for startups to go with natural intelligence instead of artificial intelligence, just a thought
- mohamedkoubaa 3mo agoI for one prefer natural stupidity over artificial stupidity
- bflesch 3mo agoIt's weird but this is the first time I realize that even the word "artificial intelligence" is a quite clever framing, because "simulated intelligence" is technically more correct to describe an LLM.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- OsrsNeedsf2P 3mo agoI looked at the PDF and confirm there is nothing of value in there.
- gateonai 3mo ago[flagged]
- evilrabbit99 3mo agoDoes this include making annoying Linkedin posts every other day about how AI 30x'ed your engineering output and killed graphic design for real this time?
- dakolli 3mo agoAI psychosis at it's finest.
- azan_ 3mo agoHow is it AI psychosis?
- cultofmetatron 3mo agostep 1: find a problem people are willing to pay to make go away. step 2: find a way to solve that problem for less money than they are willing to pay step 3: AI???
- hypfer 3mo agoFeels like a category error. It's a slide deck telling people what a product can do (that's a normal thing to release for a company), but the thing it tries to sell you on is building your own business based on their tool. Which makes no sense the way they sell it, because "founding a business" is no standard process that could be formalized in a way like that, nor does it make sense for society to have people founding businesses at a scale comparable with mowing your lawn or doing your taxes. All of this feels just unreal because it is unreal. Founding cannot be a commodity. If it is, you have no moat or point, meaning you instantly collapse again, because you are an interchangeable commodity.
- perks_12 3mo agoWelcome to the world of companies founded by business school grads. No soul, no moat, just an endless cycle of KPIs and billion-dollar exits to PE.
- Esophagus4 3mo agoCome on, get out of here with this “only true programmers can found a real company” Such gatekeeping.
- sire-vc 3mo agoWhat makes a company founded by an non-MBA have a soul? Only a true Scotsman deserves a billion dollar exit presumably.
- e9 3mo ago[dead]
- thih9 3mo agoWe have seen that category in the past, in MLM. Perhaps now it’s only two levels but still somehow pyramid shaped.
- dmujic 3mo agoYeah, and these days it really isn't a big deal to build things; it's much bigger challenge to actually develop a distribution channels and cut through the noise. I think people are just overwhelmed with everything and attention span is shorter and shorter. And that's the real issue - what I am finding now is that again the thing that really works is good old actual human conversation with potential clients.
- rw2 3mo agoGood guide but I think the product market fit portion of a startup is so key that you need no other skills except that to make a good startup. AI won't help you with that portion, only in depth knowledge of a industry or natural product intuition will. Who knows, maybe an AI ideated and AI created product will be the best app of 2026.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- jdw64 3mo agoWhen I see notes like this, I wonder whether every success story can really be summarized and patternized this way. If you're building an AI based startup, what exactly would be the point of differentiation? That seems to be the difficult part
- kubb 3mo agoI’m pretty sure the one place people will never believe AI can be applied is “being a founder”. There’s just too much invested, in terms of beliefs and money into the idea that founders are special and therefore deserve seven-eight figures off of the capital pumped into their unprofitable products. You’ll see it here in comments. People will defend A”I” applied to software engineering wherever (not) possible, but building companies? Now listen buddy there’s an irreplaceable human genius at work.
- mentalgear 3mo agoExactly, I always find it ridiculous how the suits, any layer of mid-managment to executives, are so eager on AI 'outsourcing' everything, but they themselves think the 'outsourcing' (if it really works) would stop just before their position.
- Imustaskforhelp 3mo agoI agree with you and adding on to it, Anecdotally, Someone I know said that their manager just asks them if they have drank water or not and motivate them, and the company wants them to make on their personal time what they are building with AI and showcase it. So they were joking that they were building a replacement of their manager using Claude, and although they were joking, but only partially. If anything, the managers, rationally speaking might be the one to be outsourced. Of course, though recently I have come to realize that world isn't completely rational but I have found that on the long term, it still rewards for rational behaviour (sometimes) so I think that these managers on Linkedin should feel a bit scared... (as they are probably just prompting AI to write the linkedin-texts) What if they are already scared and this is their way of coping with it? Nobody wants their job to be redundant and I wouldn't say that tech is completely scott free but rationally I find that tech has this taste/authenticity factor and there are too many factors but I must admit that these AI companies are succeeding in trying to force the narrative about jobs being completely redundant combined with job market, to make the labour vs capital divide even larger. I feel as if this is why people want to be on that side of the battle and this Linkedin-Ai-founder-syndrome is a symptom not the cause. We engineers are trying to optimize from the tech side through let's say AI to building lots of tools that we otherwise couldn't have had made due to lack of time but we had many ideas from any issues we face at tinkering/work etc.. and the managers not having to do any of it, lack the ideas in that aspect but they succeed in trying to project something even if the reality of that thing doesn't exist. So they are trying to do that. I don't know, I don't believe much in the divide of engineer vs manager but the fight is larger than it but we are infighting... We are all just fighting to get to the other side of the line of a broken system but oh well, so it is and I am unsure in what capacity can we fix it but I still hope deep down that things will improve for better because I guess hope is what makes us human.
- DR_MING 3mo ago[flagged]
- petterroea 3mo agoThis should be obvious but why would you trust what the spade seller says about being an AI-native startup. Even if you believe AI-native startup is the future (the comments are divided), you would at least want to hear from an impartial source. This is just marketing material.
- OtherShrezzing 3mo ago>As an AI-native startup founder, your responsibility is to know what's in your codebase, understand any potential exposure vectors, and not ship obvious vulnerabilities to real users who are trusting you with their data. This is fairly funny coming from the company whose employees report merging in hundreds of PRs per engineer per day, and accidentally leaked their own source code through a security misconfiguration in a package manager they own.
- etoxin 3mo agoHundreds of PR’s per engineer per day! They would have zero visibility of their code. Their AI’s would have no visibility of the million plus lines of code. Sounds super stable and cool.
- koe123 3mo ago100 PRs a day? I am sure this is hyperbole but otherwise you have a quote for me?
- owebmaster 3mo agoHere's your quote: "employees report merging in hundreds of PRs per engineer per day"
- zingar 3mo ago100 feels low given I just saw dependabot do 8 in one hour. No AI required! It matters a lot what size the PRs are, and this varies wildly from place to place. I spoke to someone who instituted a “no PRs over 500 lines” rule. I would refuse to even read something that big unless it was just a find and replace or boilerplate.
- koe123 3mo agoWho reviews these 100s of PRs tho? 100 PRs in an 8 hour workday = 1 PR every 4.8 minutes. If I saw this happening in my org it would be a huge red flag, am I old?
- TrackerFF 3mo agoWhat's AI-native these days? I've noticed that seemingly every single tech company has re-branded themselves as "AI" company. Add a RAG system and you're now AI. Add a AI-chatbot, and you're now AI.
- limflick 3mo agoI was shopping for washing machines last summer and looking at huge "AI" stickers on the more expensive ones gave me a headache.
- throwaw12 3mo agoI like how dates and copies are still the ultimate version control: "<filename>-05062026_v3 (1).pdf" So there were 4 iterations on 5th of June alone for this document
- y-curious 3mo agoA beautiful analogy for non-technical founders creating software products with AI. There are version control systems, but who needs them when you can name your pdf `n-final-updated-6-16-final-donottouch.pdf (1)(2)`
- trollbridge 3mo agoAnd a good file store and organiser is arranging all kinds of icons in different corners on your desktop.
- hansmayer 3mo ago[dead]
- rienbdj 3mo agoThis feels like a “sell the shovels” move. Social media is full of “this one prompt to get rich quick”. It’s the new “one weird trick”.
- Schiendelman 3mo agoI think it's easy for those already in the tech industry to pooh-pooh this, as the previous comments on this post have. Right now, people with ideas prompt their LLM by saying "I know how to make x, how do I turn that into a business?" Anthropic knows that, and releasing a playbook like this is a way to make people who haven't asked that question think to ask it. For a non-technical person with a small business they don't know how to operationalize, an agentic workflow is a game changer. You might go from only getting 30% of your work time to build and improve your actual product to 50% or 70%. Can you imagine having a knitting business, and suddenly being able to gauge interest for different colors with a website selector you'd have no idea how to automate? Or needing to close your shop for an upcoming holiday, and having Google and Apple Maps and your website all updated to reflect your closed dates cleanly, without having to fight through every UI? An engineer goes "bah", a baker goes "I just got to sleep two more hours". I truly think that people in the tech industry do not understand how hard technology is for people who aren't in it.
- ElProlactin 3mo ago> I truly think that people in the tech industry do not understand how hard technology is for people who aren't in it. When it comes to AI, a lot of them don't want to understand because it threatens their livelihood.
- watwut 3mo ago> Can you imagine having a knitting business, and suddenly being able to gauge interest for different colors with a website selector you'd have no idea how to automate? This does not sound like an issue small craft businesses have, but something programmer think is a thing.
- Schiendelman 3mo agoI think you're thinking of the value in "creating a selector", which is not my point. Businesses need to gauge interest and experiment with options. Knitting colors was my example of that, since I've got some personal experience helping a knitting business. If you're a nontechnical craft business owner, the work of figuring out what questions to ask to grow your business is absolutely nonintuitive, and it's one of the things LLMs are best at. The fact that it can also modify your website or listing or what have you is an additional benefit; I chose to use that specific benefit to make the concept potentially more legible to the HN audience.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- Oras 3mo agoAI has changed the build for sure, it is a lot easier to build now, a lot easier to practice multiple copywriting ideas, do market research ... etc. There is something that will never change for being a founder, you need to sell, and for that you need network and credibility. It was never about the building, its all about the selling. AI has not changed that.
- ElProlactin 3mo ago> AI has not changed that. But it has. AI can help you do market research, develop buyer personas, evaluate potential customers, create, analyze and enrich prospect lists, evaluate marketing channels, create ad copy, write sales scripts, think through objections and how to respond, etc. Will it turn you into Jordan Belfort? No. Will it be 100% successful or effective? No. But can it help enough to make a difference? Sure, in enough cases.
- LtWorf 3mo agoAI generated market research won't necessarily match reality.
- ElProlactin 3mo agoAnd? Spending 1000s of hours searching on Google, reading human-written market research reports, etc. won't necessarily "match reality" either. AI is a tool. A starting point. A feedback mechanism. It's not the end all or be all.
- nieksand 3mo agoNor will human generated market research.
- sturza 3mo agoAssumption: now everyone can do more of the above. The final line is still selling. So everyone will get to the sales part, FASTER. Triage will still happen at this stage, regardless of AI. You won’t be able to avoid this triage, regardless of how fast you get there.
- Rebuff5007 3mo agoI've been at a few VC / startup events recently and I was stunned to see the number execs frothing at the mouth about finding a 1-person-ai-driven-billion-dollar-startup. This "playbook" is probably not going to help.
- dakolli 3mo agoSomeone make a guide on how to turn these VCs into marks I can scam with a bullsh*t AI native product.
- programd 3mo agoThe feedback from the VC crowd is that the historical 5 year startup timeline is down to 18 months these days. That means finding PMF, funding rounds, hiring and scaling to $25 mil/year. That's the VC playbook changer which has them all worried about businesses which don't go all in for AI.
- arun6582 3mo agoBuying a welding machine doesn’t make you a welder
- y-curious 3mo agoTell that to certain CEOs that realized they can generate slop code and make their SWE teams deal with the tech debt lol
- jgilias 3mo agoClaude, make me rich. Make no mistakes.
- gyosko 3mo agoI'm tired boss.
- Netcob 3mo agoEspecially as someone outside the US, building a startup on AI sounds like a bad idea. Some AI company fails to pay their bribes on time, or your country doesn't cede territory to the US president, the AI gets yoinked and you are left with Mistral or Qwen. (Technically that also applies to MS Teams, Google and so on and not just AI)
- superkickstart 3mo agoEven worse if you build your processes around one ai provider like anthropic.
- Sammi 3mo agoThe platform risk for people outside the US using US based AI products is enormous, as we just learned when Fable got yoinked.
- 59nadir 3mo agoAre people upvoting this so more people can laugh at it? This whole post comes off as a parody of what Anthropic would say.
- letier 3mo agoMy absolute favorite quote: Loss of objectivity The challenge: Ask an AI tool for evidence supporting what you already believe, and it will find it. Confirmation bias now comes with a research engine.
- nilirl 3mo agoAs someone who uses these tools extensively: they're extremely productive and extremely idiotic. Detail-oriented work with lots of output that can cover up the noisy bits of thoughtless garbage? Sure, great. Analysis-oriented work where decisions have consequences over large amounts of resources? Only an idiot would use these tools for that. Maybe as a conversational note-taker, but anything more and you don't know what you're doing.
- limflick 3mo agoCould you give me an example differentiating detail oriented work vs analysis oriented work?
- alpineman 3mo agoCopypasta for LinkedInfluencers and VCs
- beratbozkurt0 3mo agoI wish there was something similar to this, an online marketing model. Indiehackers definitely need it.
- suyash 3mo agoMostly marketing fluff
- jwpapi 3mo agoIMHO most founder will fail because leaning to heavy into ai and creating a system where they never experience the friction necessary to build the domain knowledge which ultimately could be the deciding factor. Just think about website design, I don’t think it’s far-fetched to say that a non ai design website will outperform an ai designed one. These percentages add up in multiple disciplines. I would argue betting against ai is your best chance of succeeding frankly (not in all cases but certainly as displayed here)
- frangonf 3mo agoA serious AI-native founder should not waste time reading this brochures, they should make agentic loops instead where their agents autonomously read and produce brochures for their brochure first, product second startups.
- bob1029 3mo ago> Now someone with no engineering background can build production software that brings their idea to life, while a technically adept founder with little business knowledge can easily produce a go-to-market strategy, a financial model, and a highly polished pitch deck. I had a bit of a laugh. The non-technical business experts are much more likely to achieve success than the technical experts. They can actually talk to the customer and get the customer to care. No quantity of GPUs and gas turbines can correct for a lack of personality or reputation. The technology is generally not the hard part in most businesses, despite the extreme efforts of certain technology people to make it seem so.
- neya 3mo agoI wish hyperlinks used underlines. The worst possible UX is making your hyperlink resemble normal text, especially on a dark background. Sigh. Here is the direct link to the slides: https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6889473510b50328dbb70ae6/69fe2a55b93bb0732b1fe33c_The-Founders-Playbook-05062026_v3%20(1).pdf https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6889473510b50328dbb70ae6/...
- kevsim 3mo agoThey've got underlines for me at least
- SilverBirch 3mo agoI feel like a lot of this advice is kind of dangerous. How do I draft a tight investor memo? I'll ask the slop machine! It's kind of analogous to how I'm writing code right now. For simple stuff or low priority stuff I'll fire claude at it and won't look at the code if it works. But for the important stuff I'm very carefully integrated into the cycle making sure what's coming out at the end is just right. I'm carefully constructing prompt loops and validation cycles to make sure what comes out looks like what I want - because I have the knowledge and experience of what works for my specific use case. Drafting an investor memo seems like the second category of thing, you need it to be right. I don't think claude offers much of value there. What's more - if you start slopping your investors, you are going to piss them off. Unless Claude is going to say it has some special data source it's used to train on so it knows good from bad, I think this is a bad idea. This article also kind of fits in the category of "Here's how to use AI for EVERYTHING!" and actually it would be far more valuable to say "This is the bits that AI is good at, and here's where you need to do it yourself" - which is obviously a position that Anthropic can't hold.
- thunderbong 3mo agoLink to PDF https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6889473510b50328dbb70ae6/69fe2a55b93bb0732b1fe33c_The-Founders-Playbook-05062026_v3%20(1).pdf https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6889473510b50328dbb70ae6/...
- Imustaskforhelp 3mo agoHuh, I had to search this website-files.com website and it seems to be of webflow. Was the PDF created by webflow? a bit ironic. Maybe Anthropic should read their own founder's playbook to create a replacement to this tool. (Yes, I know that when involving cdn's, there's much more to the infrastructure as well but isn't that what anthropic is promising in the founder's playbook that you can be a founder which solves problems [from my understanding], My point is that there's probably much more to it than what might've been suggested which isn't a neutral source in the first place)
- geraneum 3mo ago> Founders who've never written a line of code before are shipping production applications, reaching revenue before scaling headcount Stats please
- jeppester 3mo agoI'm sure there are at least two in the world
- _pdp_ 3mo agoThis framework does not sound that much different from what people used to do but with AI agents and coding assistants, and this is not going to work unless you are lucky. LLMs cannot come up with good ideas and coding (if you believe it is solved) is no longer moat especially in the early stages. So either go viral or go home. Obviously personal connections, timing, market position all play role but let's be honest - this is not something that can be planned although in retrospect it may seem so. A % of the population will get all of this right many times in a roll but this is just mathematical certainty.
- garn810 3mo agoWhy's everyone selling themselves as "AI-native" these days?
- stymaar 3mo ago“please give your funding round to help us pay for our bills”
- asim 3mo ago> The traditional startup growth arc assumes that the path from idea to scale is validate → raise → hire → build → raise again → grow → hire more → repeat. Now, AI has erased the expectation that each new phase in the startup lifecycle requires a bigger team, a different skill set, and a fresh funding round. From 2015-2019 I spent the whole time saying "If I don't write the code nobody does". It was the point of saying to do anything requires a team, to build that team you need funding. It was a vicious cycle and took a long time to get enough traction to raise funding and do that... and then you end up in the MVP loop -> hire -> build -> validate -> rehire -> rebuild -> revalidate. Today all of that has changed. You don't necessarily need the team to write the code, it's for a different function entirely, maybe the original function which is the team was the orchestration engine for all the different pieces at play to make a company and product successful. The code is only half the equation. Looking forward to seeing how solo entrepreneurs leverage these tools and how teams transform using them.
- aswegs8 3mo agoFeels like the people who want to do it spend their time here arguing about it, and the people who will do it are the ones in the trenches epxerimenting and trying to make it work. The OP is just insight porn at this point.
- iamacyborg 3mo agoAnthropic following the well trodden path of trying to present their product as an entrepreneur’s dream. Similar to Shopify and all the make money online dropshipping slop they produce.
- sublimefire 3mo agoReads like a Shopify ad. Just use their tool and you will be able to achieve financial independence.
- jwpapi 3mo agoHonestly at this point I’m not even sure a non-local startup is a smart move anymore Like what do we really still need? Most riches nowadays are created by entertainment or scams :/
- confidantlake 3mo agoIt is a smart move if you want to be that mega rich scammer.
- coffee 3mo agoThere is still so much old school thinking and process in this. Go through this process that has been the same for the last decade+ but now you just don't need a team of people to do it. You can just use Claude instead! Really, we are in a paradigm shift, not in a "do the same thing but with less people" shift.
- zingar 3mo agoIf this is true why am I hearing so much from “AI startups” about how they have big plans to hire?
- theturtletalks 3mo agoI never understood the line of thinking so many people are trying to push. “Yeah you can build your own CRM now but the marketing and selling is the hard part.” Who said I wanted to sell it? I’m building it for myself so I can ditch SalesForce. Do I need to sell it to others for it to benefit me? The cope here is that no one will build there own Shopify or SalesForce or Airtable because “the selling is the hard part.” They don’t need to sell and market it for those SaaS to fall.
- mrmarket 3mo agothis is clearly targeting either vibecoders or people with extremely limited experience in software. i feel like it would be obvious to anyone who doesn't fall into those two categories that the 'AI wrapper' product category is both flooded and has a short shelf life. so many of these products are going to get wiped out once anthropic and other frontier labs stop pricing tokens below market and charge what they actually need for profitability. this is a short term cash grab at best. but hey, they gotta move tokens.
- djeastm 3mo ago>this is clearly targeting either vibecoders or people with extremely limited experience in software From the PDF: >Launch energy is generated from ephemeral forces, like your founder’s friends, prospective buyers at your investor’s other portfolio companies, or a Hacker News headline that drives a spike. Unfortunately, none of these reliably predicts what happens at week six or week twelve when that initial boost has faded It looks like it's targeted to HN users
- ed_mercer 3mo agoWhy is this a PDF? What if I want to read this on a phone?
- jreynar 3mo agoIt's nice to see an explanation of how they think you should use Claude for a host of different job functions / aspects of building a business, but the tone makes it seem like founding a startup is something you wake up one morning and just decide to do instead of, say, going to the park. Over coffee, you ask Claude about your idea and when it tells you "you're a genius" you're off. That's silly in so many ways. Statements like this "Validation cycles that used to take months now take afternoons" have an element of truth but ring with false promise. And that relates to the lack of timelines and focus on how long things took around 2020 BC, that is Before Claude. Building a startup isn't like having a lemonade stand as a kid where you just don't bother to do it if you forget to buy lemons or it's rainy or something more fun comes along. There's a significant compound interest element to startups that's easy to overlook. Your codebase grows over time and so does your feature set and that collection of features attracts customers in a way one thing might not. You learn as go, of course, too. This seems particularly relevant to the GTM section, which I was particularly amused by since that's what I'm focused on right now. It's a long game. Your blog post doesn't get found by anyone in Google until you've built up your SEO mojo, your LinkedIn post isn't read without the followers you need to accumulate and your content has to get engagement for people to see it even then, you don't start off line with a million followers on X, etc.
- empath75 3mo ago> the tone makes it seem like founding a startup is something you wake up one morning and just decide to do instead of, say, going to the park. I'm not sure it's a crazy idea when you can run a whole revenue generating company with basically zero employees. You could have a successful 'startup' generating 200k in revenue a year, you just need to cover the cost of your anthropic subscription.
- hcheffer 3mo ago[flagged]
- doctoboggan 3mo ago> Your blog post doesn't get found by anyone in Google until you've built up your SEO mojo, your LinkedIn post isn't read without the followers you need to accumulate and your content has to get engagement for people to see it even then, you don't start off line with a million followers on X, etc. I hate that this is true. It's the worst part about selling stuff online IMO and I found that you have to spend so much time doing it. In many cases, selling something online can be optimized to the extreme such that spend on marketing should be as high as possible and spend on the product R&D, manufacturing, support, etc should be minimized as much as possible. This equation gives you the most profit, but also gives the customer the absolute worst product that is possible to sell. Capitalism doesn't really have a solution to this problem that I've seen yet.
- jerrygoyal 3mo agonot much meat about marketing
- andsoitis 3mo ago> The founder's role is shifting from individual contributor to orchestrator, allowing them to focus on the work only they can do. Founders are individual contributors? Hmmmm.
- ElijahLynn 3mo agoI'm very grateful for this right now! I just passed the idea stage and then hit the MVP stage with a prototype with a potential customer who's definitely said they would buy it! And I'm noticing there's going to be a whole bunch of other things that I haven't thought of around actually running this thing and the timing is perfect for this playbook!
- sudhirjangir 3mo agoAI has dramatically shortened the time from idea to product. But for shortening the time from product to customer, you still need to figure that out
- losvedir 3mo agoI'm interested in the concrete technical stack that "AI-native" start-ups use. No engineers and founders just go to full production scale on something like Lovable? Or code in GitHub, with something like Jules driving all the development via GitHub issues and comments (sidenote: does anyone have a good workflow for doing this with Claude/GPT?). As someone who was the technical co-founder of a company before AI, I really feel like a lot of that role can be done by AI, if the foundation is laid appropriately.
- mips_avatar 3mo agoThis isn't about how to build an AI-native startup, it's how to use Anthropic tools to automate 2019 style app building. An AI native startup would have AI infused into the product, and Anthropic doesn't want anyone but them to sell AI.
- volkk 3mo agopretty apt actually. After skimming through it, it's mostly a big sales pitch on how to use Claude wrapped in AI slop with generic startup advice.
- david_shi 3mo agoThey don’t want you in the bake-off.
- samantp 3mo agoAnd looks like most of the document writing has been done by Claude. And that too a stereotype one (yawn)
- digitaltrees 3mo ago...And that insight is what changes everything. But not in the way people expect... My wife laughs when I sent texts in claude speak and requests it when she needs a quick giggle.
- zombot 3mo agoIt's like with those scam emails with bad grammar, a filter for the target audience.
- zombot 3mo agoOf course they want others to explore use cases for them to isolate themselves from the risks. Once the dust settles, they will cut out the middle man. And in the meantime they had someone to sell their slop to.
- warecho 3mo ago[flagged]
- darepublic 3mo agoThey're after your picnic basket just remember. Nothing will sate the bottomless appetite of Dario and his ilk. But hey some good sound bytes about the importance of humanity whilst carving you up like a turkey!
- chen66996 3mo ago[dead]
- mantlemd 3mo ago[flagged]
- terekhindc 3mo ago[flagged]
- GoodPepper50 3mo agois there a version of this that is: building a startup that really helps customers?