rw2

11 ms·

1.
by rw2 27d ago
To me it's not useful because the level of granularity is off from the level I am currently working with. Also it creates a uniform level of granularity. The great thing about AI coding is that you can go deep and detailed in hard sect
2.
by rw2 29d ago
You can love it or hate it but it's unforgettable
3.
by rw2 29d ago
Branding is crazy good
4.
by rw2 1mo ago
It's just useless to build any model in this range because deepseek flash is so fast and so cheap. I see no reason for anyone to not use it for a few points in performance. Only models that matter are the edge fable class models people
5.
by rw2 1mo ago
how does this compare to Hermes which is much cheaper?
6.
by rw2 2mo ago
I am sure it's very performant, but to me it's extremely ugly; Surely someone can fix margins and still have it be performant.
7.
by rw2 2mo ago
I think the argument for the pelican is if it cannot do a simple thing perfectly. A more complex thing is just a stacking a small errors.
8.
by rw2 2mo ago
Chinese open models are only push Anthropic and Open AI to innovate more, they are a good thing. If they don't want distillation attack they should use KYC.
9.
by rw2 2mo ago
Malaysia is just a wrong place for innovation of this level. This is a good move in the long run for Balaji and Malaysia.
10.
by rw2 2mo ago
Sure, China will build a lead in robotics, drones and weapon tech. They will invade Taiwan, US defends, WW3. If they don't have a military/tech lead, the status quo remains.
11.
by rw2 2mo ago
Totally agree with all of this. Most of the problems we solve with AI are not one shot, all the bench marks also miss the human components when testing. Thinking alongside with a human and coming to a solution is what Fable does better than
12.
by rw2 2mo ago
The amount of scientific talent in China is astounding, also it's easier to be a fast follower than a innovator. Instead of limiting models and debating ethics like Anthropic, the edge lab should focus on lengthening the lead on China.
13.
by rw2 2mo ago
There are now 3 tiers of competition: -Fable + Gpt 5.6 Sol -Opus + Gpt 5.6 Terra + Grok 4.5 + Muse Spark 1.1 -Open Chinese models: GLM + et family The economics is on the Fable tier people are willing to spend a lot on it and on the Open ti
14.
by rw2 2mo ago
Engineers to crawl that content cost money too
15.
by rw2 2mo ago
The papers can make it free, they can just build a convenient search/retrieval API layer so Open AI and Anthropic don't pay 1-2 engineers a year at 1-2m to crawl and index that info for training. The AI services have an option the
16.
by rw2 2mo ago
They are so consistently wrong and out of touch with reality they are the Cramer of publications.
17.
by rw2 3mo ago
Should charge AI for training on top of it or get them to donate. A small amount can fund them easily.
18.
Commerce Department gives green light for Anthropic to bring back Fable 5(nbcnews.com)
4 points by rw2 3mo ago|1 comments
19.
by rw2 3mo ago
The use of the "cheaper models" in big AI companies are next to useless as they don't even score as well as the open/super cheap Chinese models. Only the frontier big models like Fable and Opus have value.
20.
by rw2 3mo ago
This is making the case for Anthropic KYC for US citizens. No one would allow their accounts to do this if they were on the hook for it from the US government.
21.
by rw2 3mo ago
This is a good thing: A. This brings responsibilities on using these super powerful models like fable and mythos. B. Distillation attacks can be avoided as someone who does it can be perma banned C. Brings value to having an American passpo
22.
by rw2 3mo ago
Good guide but I think the product market fit portion of a startup is so key that you need no other skills except that to make a good startup. AI won't help you with that portion, only in depth knowledge of a industry or natural produc
23.
by rw2 3mo ago
This makes much more sense. Whatever criticism for trump he's realist who does want the US to win the AI wars.
24.
by rw2 3mo ago
Anthropic's own marketing and urban legends spawned by them is to blame too. They built up too much BS around mythos and project glasswing
25.
by rw2 3mo ago
Not really, they are not even as good as opus 4.7
26.
by rw2 3mo ago
Claude Fable is a insane improvement that is not reflected in any benchmarks that are currently out because the improvement are on the hardest problems.
27.
by rw2 9mo ago
They didn't put Opus 4.5 on the model card to compare
28.
by rw2 9mo ago
Having used it compared to Nano Banana: -The latency is still too high, lower than 10 seconds for nano banana and around 25 seconds for GPT image 1.5 -The quality is higher but not a jump like previous google models to Nano Banana Pro. Nano
29.
by rw2 10mo ago
Gemini 3 in antigravity is significantly better than Claude code with either Opus or Sonnet that I struggle to see how they can compete. And I'm someone with the 100 dollar/month plan. I can't even use Opus for a day before i
30.
by rw2 10mo ago
Gemini 3 in antigravity is amazing

More ›