jstummbillig

5 ms·

1.
by jstummbillig 3d ago
Like it! Yeah, they can just take action and pressing them on that is fine. It's not like they asked for policy before they started to mine all the data and sell the resulting product, while, surely, at some point, there must have been
2.
by jstummbillig 3d ago
> Where are those 99$ coming from? Who is actually paying this money? Companies who pay 99$ to make >99$ in return. I am not saying it works in all cases but that's the idea when a company spends money. > Because it seems like
3.
by jstummbillig 4d ago
I am trying to estimate if my reaction to seeing GPT-5.6 Sol last on that list is reasonable or or mostly emotional and find that I have no way of telling.
4.
by jstummbillig 5d ago
In a sane society we would be less willing to pass heavy judgement on so many things at passing glance.
5.
by jstummbillig 5d ago
It's unlikely that right now is peak anything AI.
6.
by jstummbillig 6d ago
Well yes, it is propaganda. They really think that. I think it would be foolish not to debate it. I remember a time in my life where the majority of people around me found the idea of farm animals being capable of fear or pain laughable, wh
7.
by jstummbillig 6d ago
If you are distilling from other models (according to Anthropic reports they are [1]), there are probably a bunch of things that you can just do away with. [1] https://www.anthropic.com/news/detecting-and-preventing-dis
8.
by jstummbillig 8d ago
For anything that can create better margins, and that is not outlawed, there will be demand.
9.
by jstummbillig 9d ago
The rules are not changing by chance. People want to use the new model. Rules are adjusted to better meet demand. People want things to be better more than they want things to not change. That's a good thing!
10.
by jstummbillig 9d ago
The equivalent alternative is not "no hourly limits", it's simply less overall weekly allowance for Plus users, or higher prices overall. It's a way to balance a scarce resource, and maybe the least frustrating one? Peop
11.
by jstummbillig 9d ago
WELL THEN, if Joan Donovan thinks so.
12.
by jstummbillig 11d ago
Statistically, yes. And statical health things are the only health things to really worry about (because you can't ever do things to avoid getting cancer, you can only ever do things to decrease your chance of getting cancer). But then
13.
by jstummbillig 11d ago
Only if you ignore baseline rates. Which brings us back to my original point.
14.
by jstummbillig 11d ago
Roughly how we price (high skilled) human labor.
15.
by jstummbillig 12d ago
Why would that be probable? People on average are fantastically bad at getting probabilities right.
16.
by jstummbillig 13d ago
As always the writing could be denser, but that is very lossy compression. I enjoyed the full read!
17.
by jstummbillig 13d ago
I have no idea how one would have to slice their data to conclude that GPT 5.6 is not a significantly better writer than GPT 3.
18.
by jstummbillig 14d ago
What exact problem? Verbosity? Quality?
19.
by jstummbillig 14d ago
Most likely outcome seems to be that this period will be over very quickly, and we will have better writing than ever before, forever. We should probably put some more thought toward that part and what it will mean.
20.
by jstummbillig 14d ago
> [...] is promising but I’ve noticed strange [...] In a nutshell, the perpetual experience of writing your own (web) text editor.
21.
by jstummbillig 14d ago
It's okay to be a prepper, but you don't have to be. Assuming access to internet, water, electricity and increasingly AI is a entirely fine way to live. It might not be anthropic which you will want to use but current capability m
22.
by jstummbillig 15d ago
Mirrors my experience with their airfilter/fan combination: Sounded smart with glowing reviews; ended up being loud, with horrible whining noises, on top of horrible aesthetics and being very expensive.
23.
by jstummbillig 15d ago
The thing that would change it a lot is that people would start trading away their GPUs, because some people would get vastly more economic use out of them.
24.
by jstummbillig 16d ago
That would support my notion that one is a fundamental block/lib for the other thing, and not really comparable. Am I wrong?
25.
by jstummbillig 16d ago
"Going into that two-way voice mode" How does that work in codex? I know the dictate function, can't find anything else.
26.
by jstummbillig 16d ago
As someone who ever used either: Are they comparable? I thought of them very differently, Pi more being, idk, a codex-light like thing and OpenClaw being this continuously running machine, doing stuff without your explicit prompting, ingest
27.
by jstummbillig 20d ago
Mostly, the law is not creating the right incentives. In this case in particular, I don't think it's so much a matter of speed: I suspect the current US admin would still sow the chaos they do to the same degree if it was ruled il
28.
by jstummbillig 20d ago
That looks roughly like a service being hammered by AI agents starting 2025, with no discernible connection to a 2012 acquisition by anyone.
29.
by jstummbillig 20d ago
What happened to GitHub?
30.
by jstummbillig 21d ago
That seems like a very lame claim, given that Social Media is data in abundance by design, and for at least 2 decades now.

More ›