Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jgilias
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
jgilias
4d ago
A contrarian take - the models aren’t advancing anymore at a pace where each new model would represent a huge capability jump, all being incremental improvements, so the doomsday marketing strategy being invoked since GPT-2 isn’t as effecti
2.
▲
by
jgilias
9d ago
I chuckle that this is in Windows XP days. You know, the pinnacle of Windows usability in retrospect.
3.
▲
by
jgilias
10d ago
It does matter, yes. Because it won’t lead to the outcome you want until someone actually gets a painful fine.
4.
▲
by
jgilias
11d ago
In medicine there’s this well known axiom that if an intervention regime would technically work, but is something that the patients tend to not follow through, then the intervention regime doesn’t work.
5.
▲
by
jgilias
13d ago
I’m so tired of every model release being touted as AGI or similar. Since <checks notes> GPT-2.
6.
▲
by
jgilias
15d ago
Cool. I’ve realized though that I don’t really need better models anymore. SOTA is good, I just want them faster/cheaper now.
7.
▲
by
jgilias
21d ago
Volkswagen has a couple too. Like, actual laboratories with people in white coats working in them. You don’t call Volkswagen “a lab” because of that.
8.
▲
by
jgilias
21d ago
Ok, so, what research department did Nvidia grow out of?
9.
▲
by
jgilias
21d ago
_why_ have people started to call companies “labs”?!
10.
▲
by
jgilias
21d ago
Would be cool to get this thing try and run the vending machine experiment.
11.
▲
by
jgilias
21d ago
That’s not surprising. He’s, like, really dense.
12.
▲
by
jgilias
22d ago
Hooked me with the first couple sentences, and I just had to keep going, as I just wanted to know what happens next. Thanks, a good read!
13.
▲
by
jgilias
23d ago
You have it mixed up. This guy is “the new generation of product people”. The old generation had to be technical enough to be able to grok the systems that they ‘producted’ over. It’s exactly the ‘new generation’ that LLM themselves right i
14.
▲
by
jgilias
23d ago
For the completion to work, the source text needs to be ‘good’. That’s a basic kernel of how the thing works. Even with a perfect oracle autocomplete if the source text is ‘bullshit’, the output is too. Or, slightly changing this. The sourc
15.
▲
by
jgilias
23d ago
We have a product guy on the team who was in a deeply not technical role before AI who is trying to do the “hey Claude, read this Jira ticket, implement” thing. It doesn’t work for the vast majority of tickets he attempts because he doesn’t
16.
▲
by
jgilias
24d ago
Being a European, I first upvoted, then moved on to read the article. I assume I’m not the only one. And my corner of Europe is relatively not that red-tape-ish. But many places are pretty horrible when it comes to that.
17.
▲
by
jgilias
1mo ago
My neighbour has a battery installation because where I live they subsidise both - the panels and the battery. In the event of a power outage he can keep running his house for ~3 days if being somewhat frugal with consumption. And the batte
18.
▲
by
jgilias
1mo ago
The more they fiddle with the autocomplete system, the more they move away from the autocomplete faithfully producing the completion I need. The more it makes sense to move to an open weights model not served by them.
19.
▲
by
jgilias
1mo ago
Definitely. I can easily cut my individual AI spend by 50% at least. But I won’t, until someone tells me to. For three reasons: 1. Thinking about how to optimize AI spend is one more thing to think about when I have too many things to think
20.
▲
by
jgilias
1mo ago
I wonder if there’s path dependence there. It _seems_ like just because you build up lots of “defence” tech that doesn’t necessarily mean you _have_ to use it? Or does it? I wonder what happened with those markets during the Cold War.
21.
▲
by
jgilias
1mo ago
What I’m doing is running a kind of a meta harness that uses different models (and underlying harnesses) to work on a problem, or review the solution. Idea is to get to an error rate better than each of the underlying models can provide. Sa
22.
▲
by
jgilias
1mo ago
Oh boy, thanks for sharing this, truly mind blowing. It was chatjimmy.ai
23.
▲
by
jgilias
1mo ago
But not the original authors of those answers.
24.
▲
by
jgilias
1mo ago
Very apt comparison! This is how I feel too. In the sense that when I’m coding as a hobby, especially something like advent of code, using an LLM would defeat the purpose for me. A bit how I don’t double check my moves with an engine when p
25.
▲
by
jgilias
1mo ago
Is it _that_ Jeff Dean? https://github.com/LRitzdorf/TheJeffDeanFacts
26.
▲
by
jgilias
1mo ago
Why do you call them “labs”?
27.
▲
by
jgilias
1mo ago
The automobile itself was initially nothing more than a toy for the rich and powerful.
28.
▲
by
jgilias
1mo ago
This article linked in the posted one is even better when it comes to “the whole picture” https://www.science.org/content/article/unearth-their-past-a...
29.
▲
by
jgilias
2mo ago
The bug has been up since before the LLM shift.
30.
▲
by
jgilias
2mo ago
Well, but then they would’ve just hopped on the eagles to fly to Mordor and just throw the damn ring into the volcano.
More ›