stymaar

6 ms·

1.
by stymaar 3d ago
> there really are a lot of potential safety and reliability problems when using random third party versions of components. What are you talking about? If a seller sells you random junk that causes safety issue, they are liable of the da
2.
by stymaar 3d ago
This. Distillation “attacks” are a made up concept. It's as if I claimed that Anthropic made a “training attack” when training on my internet writing.
3.
by stymaar 3d ago
I'm also certain that they violated countless ToS when they scrapped the internet for training purpose.
4.
by stymaar 3d ago
> There is nothing illicit or illegal Which is exactly the point of the person you're responding to. What part of “but completely legal” isn't clear enough?
5.
by stymaar 4d ago
> and the idiocy of the US police is not within their power to solve. Given how much money Google gives to electoral campaigns, I'd argue that it is in their power but that's the least of their problems when they interfere with
6.
by stymaar 4d ago
> Mathematics belongs to all of us. If mathematicians get depressed about it, I don't give a hoot. They are depressed because what's being destroyed is mathematics, actually. > Five years of guided computer-aided math could
7.
by stymaar 4d ago
Also, since it's criminal behavior (instead of just civil damage), the DoJ can sue too even is the victims don't.
8.
by stymaar 5d ago
Lucky you. I've only managed to move my family to Signal, but everything else is still on Whatsapp.
9.
by stymaar 5d ago
At the individual level any mathematicians can, but the social group of “mathematicians” will not unless drastic social changes are made, because that's not how the system works today. Drastic social changes usually take decades, and
10.
by stymaar 5d ago
For those wondering the difference with scratch, it's on the about page: > About Snap! > Snap! (formerly BYOB) is a visual, drag-and-drop programming language. It is an extended reimplementation of Scratch (a project of the Lif
11.
by stymaar 5d ago
I think that the argument is that an hostile model could attack overseas datacenters, host itself there and then launch its attack from there.
12.
by stymaar 6d ago
I don't think anyone who's tried something else can like claude code. The only reason to use it is the subsidized plan and nothing else.
13.
by stymaar 6d ago
Unless that CEO is Mark Zuckerberg, I guess.
14.
by stymaar 6d ago
I don't share your opinion: IMHO, xhigh makes sense if you want a slower Opus4.6 at home. It is able to complete tasks autonomously in a way that I've never seen another local model do. But yes, for simpler tasks or more hands cod
15.
by stymaar 6d ago
> unless reasoning is set to xhigh That's the default and I'm sure almost everyone else is also using it because other reasoning efforts yield subpar results from what I've seen.
16.
by stymaar 7d ago
They said literally the opposite in their message above. In their experience, the caveman speech occurs in chat ui, not in coding harness.
17.
by stymaar 7d ago
Looks like we're a bunch of weirdos reading Qwen's CoT in here.
18.
by stymaar 7d ago
I just tried to reproduce in Llama-cpp's webui: with the following (reverse-engineered) prompt: “Write a complete short story scene of 2000-3000 words. Use a third-person limited perspective focused on a character named Rowan. The sce
19.
by stymaar 7d ago
Do you prompt it to behave this way or what? Because here's the king of CoT I get: > Hmm, but there's a subtlety: does babel-jest + preset-typescript transform the file to CJS by default? No — babel-jest doesn't transform
20.
by stymaar 7d ago
> Qwen3.8 27B's CoT seems ... very similar. What? I've never seen garbled CoT like the one you posted when using Qwen3.8-27B.
21.
by stymaar 7d ago
Sure. But the same way it would be disingenuous to say that copyright exists so that we can have copyleft, it's a fallacy to say that trademark exist to protect the consumer, which is the point I'm arguing against: > The core r
22.
by stymaar 7d ago
FYI you're missing the satire in the comment you're responding too.
23.
by stymaar 7d ago
Nothing you've written above contradicts my argument. which is that there's no liability attached to a trademark as opposed to what something made to protect the consumer would require.
24.
by stymaar 7d ago
That's the licensing agreement between the owner and the trademarks, and their customers for the use of the trademark. But the American Halal Foundation could revise their definition of what counts as Halal, and then license the brand
25.
by stymaar 7d ago
Yet as a customer I don't think I've got to endure as many outages in my life before 2026 as I did for the past 9 months… And it's not just github, everything seems to be down on a daily basis right now.
26.
by stymaar 7d ago
> The core reason to enforce trademarks is not to fluff the corporation that holds it but to let the public be confident in the name. That's something we hear often but it's not grounded in an legal reality: trademarks are pure
27.
by stymaar 7d ago
I made the experiment some times ago: it's faster to edit the link, replace x.com with nitter.net and load the content from there, than wait until the original page load. The time difference isn't meaningful (it's less than a
28.
by stymaar 8d ago
A company who made their business out of stealing intellectual property from the entire mankind, stealing other researchers' unpublished work, how surprising, really.
29.
by stymaar 8d ago
You're confusing with Anthropic . They are definitely feeding off the fear of US control from US companies and institutions, but you can't blame them for reaping the benefits of Trump's lunacy. Amodei and Altman on the other
30.
by stymaar 9d ago
Where can I sign up for a monthly subscription on OpenRouter instead of paying the real API price?

More ›