Schiendelman

5 ms·

1.
by Schiendelman 5d ago
There's no situation with any technology where you would not have to do that.
2.
by Schiendelman 6d ago
It is encrypted. When you can run software on a device with a developer cert you can do a lot.
3.
by Schiendelman 6d ago
It is. When you have an unlocked device and developer certs you can do a lot.
4.
by Schiendelman 6d ago
Yes.
5.
by Schiendelman 6d ago
Yeah, because GDPR and AI laws in the EU conflict with each other and they haven't resolved it yet.
6.
by Schiendelman 6d ago
You don't need to share the original image with everyone , just like how journalists don't share their audio recordings from interviews with everyone. You share with an editor. Or a court.
7.
by Schiendelman 6d ago
This is correct (from someone who has worked on software to do this). Processing images for the 3D walkthroughs in real estate sometimes does this too.
8.
by Schiendelman 6d ago
Yes, that would be accurate :)
9.
by Schiendelman 6d ago
I guess I'm missing something? I took a Tesla cab with no human in it last week.
10.
by Schiendelman 6d ago
There's been plenty of evidence that nothing is recorded or sent back, hardly "absence of complete proof". People have identified basically everything coming from the network stack of an iPhone. This is already normalized in
11.
by Schiendelman 8d ago
I understood that. What about my response seems like I didn't? :)
12.
by Schiendelman 8d ago
It's also a solved problem by not deferring anything unless that person is past working age and low income. Letting people sit on wealth that they cannot pay a wealth tax on is generally bad for everyone with less wealth.
13.
by Schiendelman 8d ago
Oh, I'm with you. I think this needs to be overturned wholesale. Seattle is bad. Still better than California.
14.
by Schiendelman 9d ago
What if I did?
15.
by Schiendelman 9d ago
It's simpler than you're implying. Vancouver, like most cities, has dramatically limited what land you can build on. More than half the city is restricted to nothing larger than individual houses. Tokyo, similarly, has hit the lim
16.
by Schiendelman 9d ago
By what measure are you saying they've taken the opposite approach? It seems to me their approach has been nearly identical, just a little less restrictive.
17.
by Schiendelman 9d ago
If you're really interested: as density increases, population growth decreases. High density places become a sink for populations from elsewhere. You end up reaching a regional equilibrium, where some of the lowest density places start
18.
by Schiendelman 9d ago
A lot of this also comes down to prohibiting growth. In Seattle, every time we build a new building, everyone else's property tax payments decrease. High growth years lead to lower bills. The same would work in California, they just do
19.
by Schiendelman 9d ago
So people were getting so wealthy that they couldn't pay the property tax on their wealth. Yes. The problem is, if you let them decide to tax other people instead of themselves for the spending they themselves approve , they will.
20.
by Schiendelman 10d ago
Resilience isn't prevention. Resilience is the systems to clean up after those events. To be able to build new housing for the people who survive, to route around problems.
21.
by Schiendelman 10d ago
Same reason we have Social Security. People can't plan on a long horizon.
22.
by Schiendelman 11d ago
There hasn't been a question about this in a decade or more. There was no path, even theoretically, to stopping our CO2 emissions without dramatically lowering quality of life for maybe a couple billion people. We won't slow clima
23.
by Schiendelman 13d ago
The hard part here is that this is good for people in debt, and bad for the very wealthy, so it's not a bad way to redistribute wealth as long as real incomes are growing. During this period, real incomes have been growing, and faster
24.
by Schiendelman 22d ago
Do you understand how easy it would be to prove Apple lied about that if they did?
25.
by Schiendelman 22d ago
They didn't. It's an off the shelf chip, the threads on that post dismantled it pretty thoroughly as a false claim.
26.
by Schiendelman 22d ago
Tell me more! What evidence do you have that Apple is lying?
27.
by Schiendelman 22d ago
It's not free - you're agreeing for them to track and advertise to your customers. Apple does not do that with your Apple login data.
28.
by Schiendelman 23d ago
And reportedly early next year they have another coming out of band.
29.
by Schiendelman 23d ago
What makes you think they are less evil other than absence of high-quality information?
30.
by Schiendelman 24d ago
How do you back up? What stack are you using?

More ›