watwut

6 ms·

1.
by watwut 3d ago
They are hostile enemies and not just selfish assholes. Openly and publically so. And they have actual tangible successes.
2.
by watwut 3d ago
LLM dont have concept of right and wrong. They "did not knew they did something wrong" they followed the prompts loop given to them.
3.
by watwut 3d ago
So like, "AI is comming for the Houti jobs" is new twist for "it will replace all film makers"?
4.
by watwut 3d ago
Some people are schooled in farming. Farming is not some kind of lost knowledge people dont practice anymore.
5.
by watwut 3d ago
They were literally doing exploit gym.
6.
by watwut 3d ago
> Has our distrust in western companies really gotten to the point they'd rather unfiltered Astra level capabilities in the hands of every hostile government and terrorist organisation than potentially do any form of regulation in c
7.
by watwut 3d ago
A company that sells to Palantier is not "good hands".
8.
by watwut 3d ago
Even if they changed in between and assuming harness and loop prompter counra as part of LLM ... that comment 100% rings true for 2022. Why would that person not stand by that? Conversely, if someone exaggerated 2022 models capabilities in
9.
by watwut 3d ago
At this point, I worry a lot more of billionaires Musk, Altman, Thiel etc then of goverments in general. Thrir project is to get all power and if they succeed, it will be way worst then what we have seen so far.
10.
by watwut 3d ago
But Thiel wants people enslaved and Musk wants then killed. Altman wants them "obsolete" which means desolation. AfD wants people dead. Right wing men wants women without rights and docile. I could go on ...
11.
by watwut 4d ago
Of course most creators actually enjoy craft, do enjoy compliments and find them motivating ... and need money and want money. There is no special introspection requires, unless you are signing up for "all people are one-dimensional si
12.
by watwut 4d ago
Ok, but that one is easy to solve already. We just need to apply existing laws to OpenAI engineers, managers and leadership. Once few of those are in jail for felony hacking or criminal negligence, their AI will magically stop gpimg roque a
13.
by watwut 4d ago
Yeah, but actual roque threat is the US based AI. China is building their AI for business, military and goverment reasons. It is eventually bound to be good at that. American companies do it to build an independent AI god that is going to k
14.
by watwut 4d ago
> required for the Navier-Stokes problem. Is that the one they stole?
15.
by watwut 4d ago
Maybe we should drone bomb all the datacenters then? Or just turn off the electricity. Or maybe just do a deep financial audit of all involved companies and investors. Really go into it with a bunch of motivated white collar crime prosecuto
16.
by watwut 4d ago
None of that involved western soldiers running away from fight or being misled to leave the fight. So, again, what are you talking about here?
17.
by watwut 4d ago
> This may seem like a small thing, but a series of misteps and chronic failure to adequately advocate for users is what has led us to the toxic waste dump that so much of the Internet has become today. I think it is both monopolization
18.
by watwut 5d ago
Maybe they should not bribe Trump in the first place. You give money to a crook to help him prior election, it is only fair for him to cheat on you.
19.
by watwut 5d ago
What are you talking about here, exactly?
20.
by watwut 5d ago
Actually, it always actively suppressed content owners found repetitive or annoying. Openly so, the moderator would even state it is being done. It is simply part of moderation. And then there is flagging where certain content grts flagged
21.
by watwut 5d ago
From my observations, it seems to be kind of hit and miss. Sometimes they trade, he takes money amd do what was asked. Other times, he takes money and dont do what was asked. We dont have to imagine this. We kind of see both variants in the
22.
by watwut 5d ago
Is that even a good faith question? It is not like it was an obscure word.
23.
by watwut 5d ago
None of these is cheating: Asking older friends about what to expect from tests. Asking older friends about how to approach a difficult assignment. Reading older assignments to see how they got their grades. Getting carried on a group proje
24.
by watwut 5d ago
> 's always been my understanding that virtually everyone cheats Not true. The "have someone else writing my work" is rather massive level of cheating and not at all a routine thing everyone does.
25.
by watwut 5d ago
I agree that "some controversial views that many find distasteful" is not the same as being fascist. And well, DHH is fascist.
26.
by watwut 5d ago
I just dont think these guy are even capable to plan that much.
27.
by watwut 5d ago
I am not angry about article. I am saying that following claims are bullshit: 1.) the primary use and appeal of AI is to use it to avoid the negative side effects imposed on you by other people. 2.) people with the biggest problems with AI
28.
by watwut 5d ago
Article: someone enjoys being alone in the car, because they dont want to talk and find it impossible to be in the same space as other people without talking. And apparently end up arguing over radio each time they are on the 20min long car
29.
by watwut 5d ago
Wut? AI do absolutely nothing in terms of "avoiding the negative side effects imposed on me by other people". Instead we are all having to deal with negative side effects of AI. AI is imposed on us, whether we want it or not. >
30.
by watwut 5d ago
Maybe we (and Clausewitz) needlessly rationalize past leaders as those rational actor ignoring their emotional passions. Trump puts emotions and passions right there in the open, not bothering with plausible denialities. Hegseth is open and

More ›