10 ms·
All Bitcoin private keys are on this website
- brador 5y ago“This website doesn't actually have a database of all private keys, that would take an impossible amount of disk space.” Exactly how much space?
- einr 5y ago32 bytes per private key, 904625697166532776746648320380374280100293470930272690489102837043110636675 possible keys = 2.89480223 × 10^52 yottabytes
- tomidiany1212 5y ago
- tkw01536 5y agoReminds me of https://libraryofbabel.info/ https://libraryofbabel.info/
- lvncelot 5y agoWhich would also contain your bitcoin private key, although I would recommend not searching for it.
- lou1306 5y agoIMHO everyone interested in computer science should try some Borges, at least Ficciones. Many of his stories are so mind-boggingly close to many topics of interest in CS. Beside The Library of Babel, I can come up with at least two other examples: * Tlon Uqbar Orbis Tertius describes an extreme Idealistic philosophy where things exist only as long as someone (something?) perceives them, which IMHO is an apt description of the digital world. * Funes describes the life of a man with perfect recall: so perfect, in fact, that he is unable to classify things (e.g., stones, or dogs) due to the infinite amount of details that set every single object apart from every other. And in a way, don't ML algorithms work by teaching a computer to forget about these details?
- sirk390 5y agoJust don't lookup your private key in there. This would be like giving it to the website
- imdsm 5y agoA variant of type your password, <site> will replace it with asterisks mydogisthebestboye44 Damn it!
- thehappypm 5y agoHuh? Are you saying MY dog is NOT the best boye?
- _nhynes 5y agoPerhaps not the best of the 44th boyes. I'm sure yours ranks highly elsewhere.
- thehappypm 5y agoI can live with this. He is indeed a good boye.
- sovietmudkipz 5y agoAs a youngling I fell for this a couple times in my video games. Then I caught on and played along, seeing it as an in joke. Later I realized doing this provides social proof for the scammer. I still play video games and I call it out when I see it.
- Raphaellll 5y agohunter2
- BoiledCabbage 5y ago> **** Did you mean to type something? Or just all stars?
- swiftcoder 5y agoI'm curious whether anyone has ever actually stumbled on a wallet containing coins via this method of randomly walking all private keys. The odds are... not in one's favour
- magma1983 5y agono, they aren't.
- tromp 5y agoCuriously, after hitting a random page and >> twice, I came upon this page https://playxo.com/bitcoin/904625697166532776746648320380374280100293470930272690489102837043110636675 https://playxo.com/bitcoin/904625697166532776746648320380374... that had several keys in use in the past. I would expect this website, in the rare event of discovering some positive balance, to try spending it right away...
- john_alan 5y agoHey John - I came here to ask the same question. How is that possible. Same happened to me. >> leads to the "end" page, it's not as I though a "big jump" from some random page... thus I suspect it's simply addresses that are low entropy, at the end of the range.
- danuker 5y agoPossible causes are caching or random seeding using integer seconds.
- bspammer 5y agoOr someone implementing their own bitcoin client and using a predictable key for fun
- ORioN63 5y agoThey're the trivial wallet addresses (close to the beginning and end of the search space). I would expect them to be used for debugging and testing in the early days.
- ricardobeat 5y agoWhat makes them trivial, how are they generated?
- bspammer 5y ago> A private key is basically just a number between 1 and 2^256 It's like saying "I'm gonna pick a random number between 1 and a trillion", and then picking 999,999,999,995. Probably not a smart idea given that you don't want anyone else to be able to guess your number.
- discordance 5y agoSilliness. Yes… All private keys ∈ R
- ale42 5y agoThey even ∈ N... keys are integers, no?
- quickthrower2 5y agoEven ∈ [0, 2 ^ 256)
- rwoerz 5y agoAn all private keys are in π... somewhere.
- cedilla 5y agoProbably, yes. But that's not proven. The property that a number contains all sequences is called being "normal". We assume π is normal, but we have never proven any number to be normal, except those specifically constructed to be that way (like 0.123456789101112131415161718192021...). And that's despite the fact that almost all real numbers are normal.
- bjano 5y agoCouple years ago there was a similar site with the same idea about listing all private keys. If you "found" an active address it was immediately emptied. (I am not sure if it had a search bar or you had to edit the URL)
- skylabmelody 5y agoThis one has a more condensed ui: https://keys.lol/bitcoin/random https://keys.lol/bitcoin/random
- JimWestergren 5y agoSeveral wallets with balances here, one with more than 10 ETH, what does that mean? https://keys.lol/ethereum/904625697166532776746648320380374280100293470930272690489102837043110636675 https://keys.lol/ethereum/9046256971665327767466483203803742...
- rvz 5y agoIf you really hated crypto and wanted to show the scam of it all, then now is your chance to burst the bubble.
- giomasce 5y agoIt means inefficient market on my book. Bad, veeery bad.
- pcthrowaway 5y agoI found this a while back, but even though the public addresses can receive ETH, I believe they can't be claimed due to something like the private keys being invalid for transaction signing purposes.
- trishmapow2 5y agoPrivate key of the 10 ETH wallet isn't accepted in MyEtherWallet. Other ones are pretty much empty, so maybe the site is caching the balances. Same thing if you check page 1.
- james_a_craig 5y agoSo, after a few minutes on the site, I found a half-dozen private keys with several transactions, but zero balance. Is the key-space so densely populated that this is expected? Edit: Never mind, I'd misclicked on the "last page" button, which has a page with a fair few transactions showing.
- Havoc 5y agoI'm surprised by the amount of wallets its hitting that have had transactions. Like ~5% perhaps. Would have guess a far lower number. Almost suggests bots would have perhaps luck at hitting a live one. Which seems somewhat counterintuitive.
- globular-toast 5y agoIt is a far lower number. Are you checking random pages or browsing from the beginning? If you check random pages you're unlikely to even find a single page with a tx.
- Havoc 5y agoStarted at random point and then clicked next. I checked a dozen or so and most had around 5-8 orange addresses each. Maybe I just hit a range that is especially busy. Which in a way is even more ominous though since it should be random
- smegsicle 5y agowhat range? i feel you're joshin'
- Havoc 5y ago>i feel you're joshin' Just re-checked...the answer is a lot less mundane than theorized. I wasn't clicking on next button I was repeatedly hitting last page button...and last page for whatever stats reason has does indeed have a freakishly high high number of used addresses So interesting but of no real consequence
- Pawka 5y agoReminds me pretty popular torrent from old times named something similar to "List of all IPv4 addresses - every hacker must have". Sadly I am not able to remember exact name and find it anymore. Backstory is that ~15 years ago when upload ratio was important some person decided to generate a list and upload a torrent with such click bait name just to increase his/her ratio. It worked well.
- 400thecat 5y agothat is hilarious I remember people used to share their C:/program Files/ directory
- jkhdigital 5y agoThe Internet was so cheeky and fun 20 years ago… now it’s just tears and fistfuls of cash
- tablespoon 5y ago> The Internet was so cheeky and fun 20 years ago… now it’s just tears and fistfuls of cash Too much capitalism can ruin anything.
- cblconfederate 5y agoi loved using kazaa or hotline because you could browse other peoples directories, sometimes with random odd or forgotten files . It was a unique kind of communication / learning from other people's file organization habits
- sizzle 5y agoSame with bearshare and limewire
- baby 5y agoCryptocurrencies are fun.
- yholio 5y agoThis website contains all Bitcoin private keys in the same sense that a Turing complete computer can solve any programming problem, or the way that a suficient quantity of certain chemicals in the right environment will eventually evolve into all possible life-forms that will ever exist in the universe.
- can16358p 5y agoOr library of babel containing every sentence shorter than some length.
- quadcore 5y ago
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- metanomicon 5y agoJust curious. Legally speaking. If someone was to "guess" the private key to an account with hundreds or thousands of bitcoin, could they legally move the bitcoin and take control of it? Or is it just as much an act of theft as guessing someone's car door code and driving off with the car? I can't imagine there is any legal precedent for such a thing.
- b112 5y agoIf ownership of a thing can be asserted, then so can theft. No other legal assertions required.
- stepbeek 5y agoI don't think bitcoin would escape conventional legal definitions of ownership. I wouldn't want to be the one to test it at least.
- random_kris 5y agoAfter such transaction Bitcoin price would plummet to 0 anyway
- wruza 5y agoAs of December 2021, approximately 18.77 million Bitcoins are in circulation Thousands of bitcoin would hardly make any difference at this time. A surge will happen out of fear, but not for long.
- parsimo2010 5y agoLegally stealing you still committed theft. Just because you have the technical ability to pick a lock doesn't give you the right to enter a room and take someone else's stuff. And there is a lot of legal precedent that hacking weak passwords is still hacking (also an illegal act even if you don't steal anything) and the theft of digital goods is still theft. Practically speaking, if you actually managed to get hundreds of thousands of bitcoin, you're going to have someone very interested in getting it back. The legal argument might not even concern you if the previous holder of those bitcoins thinks that most likely way to recover their money by hiring thugs to hurt you.
- Blackstone4 5y agoWhat would quantum comouting mean for Bitcoin?
- jtbayly 5y agoDrat. I didn’t find any money.
- known 5y ago
- iamricks 5y agoIf someone guessed your private key, mathematically, would you be the unluckiest person in the world?
- space_rock 5y agoI'd more worried about a super volcano destroying humanity 256bits? Not going to happen
- unnouinceput 5y agoQuote: "A private key is basically just a number between 1 and 2^256" Anyone who still uses 2^256 as key length deserves to have their bitcoins stolen. Form what I know modern wallets have their keys more like 2^4096, at least. Heck, even Satoshi did that with its wallet, you know the famous >1M bitcoins he mined at beginning.
- rwiggum 5y agoThis is false
- jtbayly 5y agoAm I right in understanding that this is somehow checking every private key on the page against every single wallet with money? How can it do that so fast?
- herve76 5y agoI guess I got lucky with this one: https://playxo.com/bitcoin/904625697166532776746648320380374280100293470930272690489102837043110636675 https://playxo.com/bitcoin/904625697166532776746648320380374... How is it possible?
- wastoids 5y agoWell you're on the last page so not that lucky
- mrorbitman 5y agoI get that it's statistically impossible to actually rob bitcoin using this site (by finding a "green" private key). But can anyone explain why I am able to find so many "yellow" ones (empty wallets that have previously made transactions)? I expected going in to _only_ find "red" (never used) wallets and was surprised to find that was very much not the case.
- jerry1979 5y agoAs far as I have found, the yellow ones appear on the first pages and last pages. The first key listed is this: 5HpHagT65TZzG1PH3CSu63k8DbpvD8s5ip4nEB3kEsreAnchuDf That key might look large, but I believe it is actually the number 1 in WIF format. See here: https://learnmeabitcoin.com/technical/wif https://learnmeabitcoin.com/technical/wif
- notreallyserio 5y agoSomewhat related: Every once in a while someone sends BTC to the wallet you get when you generate a private key based on hashes of the word "bitcoin"[0] and the empty string[1]. 0: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1E984zyYbNmeuumzEdqT8VSL8QGJi3byAD https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1E984zyYbNmeuumzEdqT8... 1: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1HZwkjkeaoZfTSaJxDw6aKkxp45agDiEzN https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1HZwkjkeaoZfTSaJxDw6a...
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- divbzero 5y ago“When it was proclaimed that the Library contained all books, the first impression was one of extravagant happiness. All men felt themselves to be the masters of an intact and secret treasure. There was no personal or world problem whose eloquent solution did not exist in some hexagon. The universe was justified, the universe suddenly usurped the unlimited dimensions of hope.” — Jorge Luis Borges
- avaika 5y agoSo this is basically πfs of the crypto world, right? [0]: https://github.com/philipl/pifs https://github.com/philipl/pifs
- frisco 5y agoThis raises a really interesting question. Though it’s essentially impossible to figure out the key for any given wallet… if you download the blockchain and generate private keys as fast as you can, how often do you find one that has a balance? Will there just be some ongoing very low but decidedly nonzero risk of all of your assets vanishing some day if you’re not using multisig?
- magma1983 5y agoWith every supercomputer working for 100 years, you can have 0.01% of all accounts, maybe.
- Tuna-Fish 5y ago... not even close. 2^256 is a very large number. If you could build a computer that required a single atom, and could test the balance of a single account in a single nanosecond, and then converted the entirety of the earth into such computers, it would take ~2.8 million years for you to check 0.01% of all accounts. Brute-forcing modern cryptography isn't something that can happen. The magnitude of 2^256 is close to the count of atoms in the entire observable universe.
- formerly_proven 5y agoThis reminds me of a discussion a few years ago where someone was extremely adamant that you'd have to handle the chance of a key collision in a random 256-bit key for the system to be secure :)
- rocqua 5y agoI might agree with them because your random process could be weaker than you think without having any indication until you hit the colision. Anything past detection and panicking might be overkill tho.
- deleted 5y ago
- hn_throwaway_69 5y ago>Finding an active wallet is hard, but not impossible. Hard may be an understatement...
- rocqua 5y agoIf you happen to know an active wallet...
- sudhirj 5y agoObligatory reminder about the birthday problem - the probability that someone birthday is a particular day is 1/365, but the chances of two people in a group of 30 having the same birthday is very high - because the universe has so many combinations of people to work with. The chances of hitting a particular wallet you want to hack are 1/2^256 or some absurdly minuscule number, but the chances of hitting some wallet are higher because there are so many opportunities to get lucky.
- nielsole 5y agoEven if there were 10^18 wallets your chance of finding any private key is effectively zero
- sudhirj 5y agoYeah, but people seem to have found wallets already. This is more a reminder that the probability is a little different from the naive 1/total possibilities idea.
- FabHK 5y agoThe birthday paradox speaks to the probability of having a collision, though - in other words, if you randomly try wallets, the probability that you hit one again that you've tried already. That probability is higher than the probability of hitting a non-zero wallet, once you've tried more wallets than there are non-zero wallets. The birthday paradox says that you need to try sqrt(N) before you have a collision, while here we still need to hit N/k (where k is the number of non-zero wallets) before we find a non-zero wallet, and the latter number is much bigger than the former.
- rhn_mk1 5y agoAre they though? What kind of a random number generator is being used? Does it have 256 bits of entropy?
- Marazan 5y agoI could simply* be a 256bit LFSR so guaranteed to cycle through every possibility. * As far as I'm aware there are not taps published for a 256 LFSR.
- micw 5y agoI doubt it actually works correctly. When I get a random number out of 904625697166532776746648320380374280100293470930272690489102837043110636675, it's the probably that it has the same amount of digits is ~1:9 and has at least 3 digits less is ~1:900. But i constantly get way smaller numbers.
- theden 5y agoIt's like passively playing the world's worst lottery in terms of odds, but hundreds of thousands of times every second. It's fun but the odds are astronomically low. I have a script[1] that generates a pub+private key and checks against a massive file of addresses with BTC[2]. The list of addresses is loaded in memory as a python `set` so checking is O(1), but I feel like optimisations at increasing the rate are futile, since no matter what you're basically rolling the die and hoping RNG lands on your side in your lifetime and your universe of all possible universes. 1. https://github.com/theden/btc-heist https://github.com/theden/btc-heist 2. https://bitkeys.work/download.php https://bitkeys.work/download.php has a weekly updated CSV of all known addresses with nonzero BTC balance
- HPsquared 5y agoThat's what mining is too, basically. It's just that a mining rig can "buy a lot more tickets".
- theden 5y agoSolo mining yeah definitely, but with pool mining one can at least generate some fraction of a BTC.
- kosinus 5y agoMake me wonder, at what point does brute forcing private keys become more lucrative than mining?
- temp0826 5y agoI mean...btc will eventually hit the supply limit. Sort of hilarious if all mining hardware was repurposed at that point to work on brute forcing instead
- tromp 5y agoTransaction fees will dominate the block subsidy long before that. Probably within the next 2 decades (in which the subsidy drops 32x).
- bartkappenburg 5y agoFor all dutch people in this thread: "the guy who knows all PIN-codes" [0] [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p54CXA2eilk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p54CXA2eilk
- jhoelzel 5y agothe odds increase a lot though if you have millions of people all over the world using the site to generate pairs right? ;) yes yes i know its still a shot in the dark but a man can dream.
- globular-toast 5y agoIf you actually did stumble upon a key with a balance, would you steal it? I think I would and I wouldn't even feel bad about it even though logically I know it's a horrible thing to do.
- Simon_O_Rourke 5y ago
- wirelesspotat 5y agoSoo what happens if you're incredibly lucky and stumble across the private key for an active wallet? If you transfer the funds out, isn't that just theft? Is "guessing" a private key any different from guessing someone's bank details?
- folli 5y agoIn a decentralized system, 'theft' is only a moral construct, not a legal one. And who will enforce any repercussions?
- hnbad 5y agoWait, do you also think international companies are above the law? States very much care what's going on within its borders, if its via services hosted outside them or not. And in some cases states will even care about what their citizens do outside their borders. For example, engaging in child sex tourism can have legal consequences even if the actual abuse happens in a foreign country. Decentralization isn't magic. States will enact and enforce laws within their borders and they will have more tangible effects than any so-called "smart" contract.
- folli 5y agoI don't see how that relates to my statement. In the trustless and decentralized system of Bitcoin (and other blockchain implementations), there is no concept of theft. If you misplace your private key you're on your own. There's no central authority to turn to. Similar if someone cracks your private key. That's the entire idea of the technology. If you use bitcoin for money laundering, you're not gonna get in trouble with any bitcoin nodes. What a nation state will do if they find out is however a very different topic.
- DarylZero 5y agoThere's no concept of theft in the physical material of gold either.
- 5y ago
- anshumankmr 5y ago> Finding an active wallet is hard, but not impossible. Every time you open a random page, you have a chance of finding someone else's fortune. Good to know I have a 1/2^256 chance to find a bitcoin billionaire's wallet. This feels only slightly more ludicrous than the guy who lost his bitcoin in a hard drive and went looking for it in a dumpster.
- caaqil 5y agoThis guy? https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/15/uk-man-makes-last-ditch-effort-to-recover-lost-bitcoin-hard-drive.html https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/15/uk-man-makes-last-ditch-effo... Russ Hanneman did it better: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKXqZh43OH8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKXqZh43OH8
- kilroy123 5y agoOh it's even crazier. He's trying to excavate the entire land fill now. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hard-drive-lost-bitcoin-landfill/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hard-drive-lost-bitcoin-landfil...
- anshumankmr 5y agoAt this point, I hope he finds it.
- bhawks 5y agoPlot twist: it turns out to be the only key every found using this website. A user finds it 4 hours and 20 minutes before he excavates the hard drive.
- maxbond 5y agoI think he's in the same category as those startups that try to make a technology that has been repeatedly proven to be nonviable, like wireless power transmission or ducted windmills. His plans don't make sense. The government has made it clear that there will be no excavation. But that doesn't seem to matter, it's such an attractive story and there's such a mania for bitcoin that he can find backing anyway.
- s5300 5y agoI found a used wallet on 1337, and also a few other funny number strings that quickly came to mind. Does this mean I’ve won the game?
- bellajbadr 5y agoIt would be interesting if the code is open sourced
- spuz 5y agoThis looks like a clone of: https://keys.lol/bitcoin/ https://keys.lol/bitcoin/ Which runs its key generator using this open source code: https://github.com/SjorsO/keys-generator https://github.com/SjorsO/keys-generator
- sergioisidoro 5y agoWho made the website probably should have made an interception script. Or probably did... If any of the website users ever finds a viable wallet, just import the wallet right away server side and move all the funds :)
- quickthrower2 5y agoWith crypto being as shady as it is, this is probably a trap to get people to look up their own keys.
- joshxyz 5y agoIs this the modern "i am feeling lucky" button? Hahaha
- paradite 5y agoI had a similar idea a while back, albeit less profitable. It is to find all integers inside pi: https://pi.paradite.com/ https://pi.paradite.com/
- nur23kg 5y ago
- hjorthjort 5y agoWord of advice: don't go looking for your private keys. If someone was malicious they could log all fetched pages and scan those for keys with funds attached. The act of looking up a specific key is revealing information.
- Lucasoato 5y agoLet's play a game just to visualize how unlikely this is. Do you know our universe? Nice, now choose a random atom. Yup, one single atom. Randomly guessing your exact single atom is just a bit harder than guessing someone's private key in that way... considering that the number of atom in the observable universe is between 10^78 and 10^82 and not considering that there are a lot of wallets around.
- Mohune 5y ago
- black_13 5y ago
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- bhouston 5y agoI completely expect in the next 10 years someone will steal Satoshi's private key for their huge horde of bitcoin. The incentives are huge.
- drexlspivey 5y agoI’ll take the over
- bhouston 5y agoThe reason why I think it will be eventually cracked is that technology moves forward and old encryption techniques need to be upgraded, but if Satoshi is dead, he will never upgrade his key. This means that eventually it will be crackable. Encryption over time never holds up as well as people believe it is when it is initially created. I look at MD5, designed in 1991, declared broken and insecure by 2008. SHA1, designed in 1995, declared insecure in 2005. When git moved away from SHA1, projects could move towards SHA2 because they were still active. Satoshi's keys can not move to better encryption techniques as things evolve if he is dead. Thus eventually his keys should be broken unless we assume that progress in cryptography is dead, or it is a solved problem. Maybe we have finally solved it for one and all, but I suspect we haven't.
- FabHK 5y agoThere is nothing to crack. You "just" need to guess it. It is impossible for the foreseeable future with technology as we understand it today, and if it becomes possible, then a lot of other things have to change. In other words, if it ever happens, by that time BTC will have become irrelevant.
- ivanche 5y agoIt reminds me of "All credit card PINs in the world leaked out! Here they are: 0000, 0001, ..., 9999".
- zikduruqe 5y agoHere also. https://keys.lol https://keys.lol Good luck.
- jozo2 5y agoThis is like when you learned programming 20 years ago and realized that if you randomly generated a 300x300 pixel image you could get a nude picture. Exciting until you learned how to calculate the odds…
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- mogoh 5y agoAll human knowledge is in /dev/urandom
- tompccs 5y agoAt what point does brute forcing wallet private keys become more lucrative for miners than mining? Presumably you can use almost identical hardware too.
- Jerrrry 5y agoIn a couple trillion years.
- hankchinaski 5y agorelevant video that this reminded me of "Stealing Bitcoin with Math" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2s3_UG9IPU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2s3_UG9IPU
- lngnmn2 5y ago
- mnahkies 5y agoI was fascinated by a similar idea as a child, generating images of everything that has been, could be, or will be by exhaustively going through the possible combinations of pixels for some fixed size of image. Later realized that the number of combinations were impossibly large, although in some ways the models that generate photos of people that aren't real, etc are searching the same space just with a lot of direction on what they are searching for (as opposed to my math.rand implementation in Adobe flash that produced noise...)
- hbn 5y agoI remember being very young and theorizing that video games worked by having every possible frame that could exist for the game loaded onto them, and as you pressed buttons the game would show you the appropriate frames for your scenario. I guess because I had something of an understanding of how movies worked, I just assumed video games would be exactly the same. Probably not the most efficient method of fitting a game onto a Gameboy cartridge!
- CamelRocketFish 5y agoI theorised the exact same. For a basic Zork style game, I guess it kind of was? But once you get to 3D, wow, huge number of frames.
- thegeomaster 5y agoWow, I had this same idea as a kid too! I daydreamed about all the cool images you could generate. For example, you could create an image that describes the cure for cancer, because that's just another image, right?
- BenjiWiebe 5y agoAnd think of how many more images you'd see that were almost the cure for cancer, with small parts obscured or just subtly wrong... And think of how many different images could all show the cure for cancer. Surely someone's seen it already!
- 5y ago
- albybisy 5y agoi want to find the private key of Satoshi Nakamoto wallet! Wish me luck :)
- iso8859-1 5y agoWhat if my utxo is a taproot output? The page only shows base52 addresses. What if they are additionally locked with hash like Lightning channels are? The checker is bound to be unexhaustive because even with Bitcoins limited scripting, there are too many scripts to check. And with taproot it has gotten even cheaper to use complicated locking schemes.
- authed 5y agoWhat's up with this in the javascript: -1 !== a.indexOf("1EHNa6Q4Jz2uvNExL497mE43ikXhwF6kZm,") && (a = a.replace("1EHNa6Q4Jz2uvNExL497mE43ikXhwF6kZm,", ""), r("5HpHagT65TZzG1PH3CSu63k8DbpvD8s5ip4nEB3kEsreAnchuDf", 0, 1213)), -1 !== a.indexOf(",1JPbzbsAx1HyaDQoLMapWGoqf9pD5uha5m") && (a = a.replace(",1JPbzbsAx1HyaDQoLMapWGoqf9pD5uha5m", ""), r("5Km2kuu7vtFDPpxywn4u3NLpbr5jKpTB3jsuDU2KYEqetqj84qw", 0, 19)), -1 !== a.indexOf("1BFhrfTTZP3Nw4BNy4eX4KFLsn9ZeijcMm,") && (a = a.replace("1BFhrfTTZP3Nw4BNy4eX4KFLsn9ZeijcMm,", ""), r("5KJp7KEffR7HHFWSFYjiCUAntRSTY69LAQEX1AUzaSBHHFdKEpQ", 0, 165)), axios.get(n + a).then((function(e) { keys.forEach((function(t) { o(3e3).then((function() { var n = e.data[t.pub]; void 0 !== n && r(t.wif, n.final_balance / 1e8, n.n_tx) })) })) })) , isOnFirstPage ? (a = keys.slice(1).map((function(e) { return e.cpub })).join(","), r("5HpHagT65TZzG1PH3CSu63k8DbpvD8s5ip4nEB3kEsreAnchuDf", 0, 24)) : a = keys.map((function(e) { return e.cpub
- Navarr 5y agoI suppose if you took Nakamoto's coins, you'd either get away with it or learn who Nakamoto is REAL quick
- zild3d 5y agoProbably a dumb question but why are there links to 2 btc addresses for each key, not just 1?
- neilsense 5y agosegwit addresses
- syngrog66 5y agoI predicted/realized something like this was possible, years ago, back when I first read the Bitcoin paper. The trick is that its a gigantically gigantic range of numbers
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- singularity2001 5y agosome even have transactions: https://playxo.com/bitcoin/1 https://playxo.com/bitcoin/1 https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1PDSZN2qgFcuay1vVRxYo1yp9gfXeSKJgt https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1PDSZN2qgFcuay1vVRxYo... is/was there a way to get vanity keys from the 'first page'? also last one: https://playxo.com/bitcoin/904625697166532776746648320380374280100293470930272690489102837043110636675 https://playxo.com/bitcoin/904625697166532776746648320380374... if a visitor to this site stumbles upon a jackpot, will the server be informed?
- 1phone1 5y ago[dead]
- Holamrjuan 5y agoIf by any chance I come up with a wallet that has BTC in it, who do I transfer those BTC to my wallet ?
- 11111 5y ago
- daivid 5y ago
- daivid 5y ago
- daivid 5y ago
- daivid 5y ago
- daivid 5y ago
- 1phone1 5y ago[dead]
- bbc555666 5y ago