rhn_mk1

7 ms·

1.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
I want to see that shader. How is sloshing implemented? Is the volume of the bottle computed on every frame? Clearly, there's some sort of a physics simulation going on there, preserving the volume, some momentum, and taking gravity in
2.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
https://www.wayfair.com/decor-pillows/sb1/roll-wallpaper-c18... > Britiany Peel & Stick Floral Roll by Canora Grey > From$1.20/sq. ft. https://www.ehd.org/science_technology_largenum
3.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
"asdf".indexOf("as") is 0 but "asdf"[0] is NOT "as". so there can be no expectation that ""[0] is "". Those two operations are not related to each other. It's more intuitive i
4.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
You can get knowledge (e.g. mathematical) without observation. You can't get information without observation.
5.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
"Reasonable" is an unfortunate word IMO. An assumption doesn't come out of reasoning. We can't even estimate the probability of this assumption being right because we can't see the future. The best way this word fit
6.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
A script to arrange 2 pages of a PDF side-by-side. Another bunch takes care of creating invoices, gathering bank statements, and paying using the bank account. Finally, a temperature limiting daemon because thermald doesn't seem to wor
7.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
Check out Recoll with Recoll-WE https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/recoll-we/
8.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
If you're clipped in, why would you keep feet from sliding? Preventing sliding by pushing is how effort is wasted and is a possible explanation why a cyclist might feel much stronger when clipped in and no longer has to push - while at
9.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
Those are not necessarily examples of lifting . Those could as well be explained by the contribution of not pressing on the opposite pedal (to keep the foot from sliding). And not pressing doesn't shine any light on the force of lif
10.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
Is there a fixed-function circuit that can read a digital value out of a sensor and compare it with a threshold? I'm not dounting it's possibly, but I'd be surprised if it's available without involving a Turing-complete
11.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
To let it turn off when you're not using it. It uses an inertial sensor.
12.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
What the fuck are we doing as a society that we have such a system of perverse incentives in place?
13.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
How can it be disabled in certbot?
14.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
More generally, they are called smart cards, and can be in the form factor of a USB stick (not mass storage USB stick).
15.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
Does the secure enclave need to be built into the main CPU though? A key store on a USB stick or on a TPM will never allow your keys to be exfiltrated, yet it's not part of the CPU, and it's even removable.
16.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
A dream - the code contains a hash which identifies the file. Like ipfs + bittorrent.
17.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
It's ironic that property rights have been eroded in the name of protecting property.
18.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
It reminds me of the cycle of enshittification: once you have a captive audience, you start bumping the profits at the cost of the user experience. It looks like something similar is in effect here: instead of meeting the different customer
19.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
While I agree that your child is not you and FOSS doesn't need to be your child's value, it needs to be said that FOSS is the software author's value. It correlates with the author's intentions, their incentive and the s
20.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
The problem is that it's not an either-or. Adding app operation alongside coin operation would have been an improvement in useability. Replacing coins with apps is just making it suck in a different way.
21.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
IMO not every coder is sloppy with use-after-free. Not everyone is slopy with incorrect mutability. [...] Not everyone is sloppy with $THING[N]. But it's hard to consistently not be sloppy in any one of them, and N are so many that alm
22.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
Does failing after 10 years count as a failure? Cause living for the next 10 years is not really that difficult, and the relevant people will still likely be around. Sure, the offer might as well be for 90 years, or even 50 years without mu
23.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
It's countered by not making the assertion and not being able to make conclusions. You only need a lack of confidence for that. It's orders of magnitude easier to not have knowledge compared to having it.
24.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
Place built to require X is unuseable without X unless the dependency is broken - news at 11.
25.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
That is not a given, see sibling comment.
26.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
Cars becoming illegal over night is about as ralistic as popping up infrastructure replacing it over night. It's a complete straw man. In reality, cars can only disappear gradually, with less-car-dependent infrastructure replacing them
27.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
I guess you chose your work/housing combo to be only friendly to a car. The alternative in this case is to choose a place where they are not so far apart - hardly impossible.
28.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
Perhaps you need a (e-)bike. Instead of taking 15min, you'd take 30min at city speeds. But actually, if cars disappeared, people would have an incentive to work closer to where they live. So instead of living next to a quick road conne
29.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
https://avif.io/blog/comparisons/avif-vs-webp/ > AVIF has an image resolution limit of 65536 x 65536 pixels. but from https://tonisagrista.com/blog/2023/jpegxl-vs-avif/ >
30.
by rhn_mk1 3y ago
Can you show some sources for how Brave is scamming people out of privacy (or whatever else "privacy scam" means)?

More ›