can16358p

6 ms·

1.
by can16358p 7d ago
Thought it will bring "desiging for foldables" onto the table which would benefit Android foldables too.
2.
by can16358p 4mo ago
It looks cool but I wasn't able to get any audio when I started playing. iOS 26.4.2, Safari, sound is on.
3.
by can16358p 6mo ago
Buy it in combo with the good ol' Blockchain perfume!
4.
by can16358p 6mo ago
How would this play with mobile apps? I'd love to see an agent doing work, then launching app on iOS sim or Android emu to visually "use" the app to inspect whether things work as expected or not.
5.
by can16358p 8mo ago
The AirDrop randomly not working one is really manifesting at the most inconvenient times. Apple simply won't fix it.
6.
by can16358p 11mo ago
Let me have a look. Do you think the material is of good quality and healthy (no weird questionable materials for wearing/skin contact for long time with sweat etc)?
7.
by can16358p 11mo ago
Cushions (yeah replacable but not super cheap), the cable that connects one earpiece to other, the bit connecting the earpieces, the hinges around the earpieces. Literally everything. The sound is still great and battery is awesome. But I d
8.
by can16358p 11mo ago
Just curious, which Sennheisers did you give up on in favor of APP3? I have over-the-ear Momentum 3 and love it, but if APP3 provides better sound quality and better ANC I might consider switching as Momentum 3, while I love it, is bulky, h
9.
by can16358p 11mo ago
All those modular smartphones, and also Amazon's Fire phone. Why? Obviously close-to-zero market. It was unbelievable how those people though those projects would even succeed.
10.
by can16358p 1y ago
It's just an extra measure, not protecting the server from a malicious user, but an honest user's potential mismanagement of credentials.
11.
by can16358p 1y ago
Banning anything is never the solution. Don't want to use social media? Don't use it. No one can decide for others.
12.
by can16358p 1y ago
There might be some sensitive applications where server might want to immediately revoke credentials server-side though.
13.
by can16358p 1y ago
Great. Let's not slow down CPUs coupled with aging batteries and instead have a full system crash suddenly at the most demanding moment. Sure that would be much better.
14.
by can16358p 1y ago
All down here (Turkey).
15.
by can16358p 1y ago
I'd love to know how many people use VPNs because of "fear of being hacked" (hack covering everything non tech-savvy here). Almost everyone I know use VPNs only to bypass restrictions, not for fear or privacy.
16.
by can16358p 1y ago
I don't think forcing a company to open source their IP is a good move, but perhaps there might be some encouragement implemented for opening up their bootloader so the device is more hackable. But forcing is never a right thing.
17.
by can16358p 1y ago
Actually I didn't mean anything that contradicts your comment. I do agree with what you are saying. I don't think we should be expecting moral values from any company over a certain size, be it Apple, Google, or anything else. The
18.
by can16358p 1y ago
1. Not endorsement, but at least a recognition of some sort that Apple recognized the dev and the app and allowed them to publish this app (regardless of which store). 2. AFAIK Apple isn't doing anything illegal by pulling out this app
19.
by can16358p 1y ago
If an OS needs antivirus for this, that OS has been designed wrong (excluding Linux, FreeBSD etc as the target audience isn't regular end users) in the first place. An OS should NOT need antivirus, it needs proper sandbox and container
20.
by can16358p 1y ago
Not to play devil's advocate here and also IANAL but: If (as as it is) Apple is still controlling apps via notarizarion/digitally signing apps of and recognizing developers, and if the app is developed for something that would lan
21.
by can16358p 1y ago
Or: One (a big entity with enough resources) should take this as an opportunity and create a new, third truly open alternative to iOS and Android (no, I'm not talking about an AOSP fork, I'm saying something totally new) and let i
22.
by can16358p 1y ago
Putting aside security/privacy implications, Why not?
23.
by can16358p 1y ago
While I agree about devs should be testing on slow devices, the particular target audience of the site generally have pretty decent machines (including two that I have) and there isn't much reason for the site lag. It's not really
24.
by can16358p 1y ago
Google was always dystopian and evil. They just wore good mask for some time in the beginning.
25.
by can16358p 1y ago
"Can?" Sure. "Would?" Google has zero incentive to do that.
26.
by can16358p 1y ago
Not sure how to get it to work. When I open the page there's an empty box at top left resembling an incoming message but without any message. I also tried sending a "hello" message anyway, and after it, another completely em
27.
by can16358p 1y ago
Hardware: looks nice. Software: big NO. Anything from Google is a red flag for me. If there was a hypothetical phone with this hardware with iOS, that would be really nice.
28.
by can16358p 1y ago
But can't the bad actors use the same APIs to ensure that it's passing this first?
29.
by can16358p 1y ago
Speak for yourself please. No one can dictate who can watch something or not.
30.
by can16358p 1y ago
Agreed. It's fascinating to think about (no pun intended) where this could go, but also I can't keep myself imagining a world where this tech is ubiquitous and everyone's wearing those casually and it's all "cloud&q

More ›