azth

6 ms·

1.
by azth 4y ago
Where’s he justifying it? He’s simply pointing out the double standards when the West policies the world how they can get away with whatever atrocities they want. Plus, you furthered his point by calling the western atrocious as “conflicts”
2.
by azth 4y ago
What's the cost of water salination? California has a coast.
3.
by azth 4y ago
That's a false dichotomy, because nonreligious people find some other ways to create an "us vs them" mindset. We see it all the time. It's also a fallacy to group all religions under one banner and claim that they all sa
4.
by azth 4y ago
What effect will this have on its price?
5.
by azth 4y ago
Those kinds of apps appearing are due to circumstances that set the wheels in motion a long time before. When religions like Islam, Judaism, and Christianity heavily control mixing between the genders, it's for a reason. Once the bound
6.
by azth 4y ago
That's a straw man. Speaking as a Muslim, Islam controls mixing between genders of people that are non-Mahrams (i.e. people who are able to get married to each other). The same applies to Judaism and Christianity. Interactions between
7.
by azth 4y ago
Lebanon was literally formed by the colonialist West, who used divide and conquer to strategically place people there so that the conflicts keep going.
8.
by azth 4y ago
I disagree that Muslims want democracy (I'm Muslim). Present day democracy generally contradicts and is against Islam, so I'm not sure where you're getting your information from.
9.
by azth 4y ago
Generic specialization is being worked on.
10.
by azth 4y ago
There is a lot of pioneering work done in Java and the JVM. GraalVM, ZGC, Shenandoah are but a few.
11.
by azth 4y ago
Let's look at that notion deeper. Are you able to claim that consenting adults engaging in sexual acts together in an uncontrolled manner (i.e. no marriage contract) is not hurting others? What about consenting teens with each other? I
12.
by azth 4y ago
That's a hand wavy answer that won't hold up to scrutiny. In some cultures, human sacrifice was permitted and seen as normal and acceptable. I think you would consider that a violation of human rights, but based on what? I agree t
13.
by azth 4y ago
What was the stack used to write such a system? Was it a lot of C++? And what storage systems did they use? Sounds pretty cool.
14.
by azth 4y ago
Depends on which religion. We see what worldwide secualarization is doing to the rest of the world today.
15.
by azth 4y ago
So ignorant to call them "tax base", when in actuality, Zakat that Muslims pay is much much more than the Jizya that Dhimmis pay. The Copts exist today because of the Muslims, this is a fact, even if you try to twist the meaning o
16.
by azth 4y ago
"These people", sounds "racist" huh? We see what's coming, we see how things are unfolding in the rest of the world, so taking preventative action is only the smart and rational thing to do. You might not agree with
17.
by azth 4y ago
Homosexual acts are prohibited in the Islamic faith. No one is forcing you to accept it, as such, you should leave those countries rule according to their faith. Islam has been preserved for over 1,400 years now, we don't need or want
18.
by azth 4y ago
It's not private behavior, that's the problem. Secondly, just because something is private (or not) does not mean it is acceptable. Some behavior are infective, and spread throughout society. We're seeing what's happenin
19.
by azth 4y ago
No one is saying they are not human (straw man). Aren't thieves or murderers human as well? This is a weak argument frankly.
20.
by azth 4y ago
Who dictates "human rights"?
21.
by azth 4y ago
Logical fallacy, just because humans naturally gravitate towards something does not make it right. Humans gravitate toward feeling good (drugs), and we see how that turns out for example.
22.
by azth 4y ago
Which religious groups? As a Muslim, it's prohibited because God said so, there's really nothing more to be said. The Creator knows what is good and what is bad for us, and we are to Submit to His orders. In many times, the Wisdom
23.
by azth 4y ago
You're straw manning. Not all crimes should have the death penalty. But severe abhorrent ones like killing, spreading of chaos (i.e. "terrorism"), or some other abhorrent obvious ones. We see that in countries that do apply t
24.
by azth 4y ago
The Pact of Umar would like to have a word with you. The Copts exist today and their rights preserved because of the Muslims protecting them. "Slaughtering" people indiscriminately like you're implying is against Islam.
25.
by azth 4y ago
From wikipedia, while not being a reliable source in general, I already know that Arabs came from the North from other sources: > Arabs are first mentioned in Biblical and Assyrian texts of the ninth to fifth centuries BC where they appe
26.
by azth 4y ago
> In my (subjective, biased, maybe incorrect,) opinion people whose code of "ethics" includes phrases like ... are dangerous Yeah, definitely biased and incorrect opinion. Are you aware that these tenants are not just in Christ
27.
by azth 4y ago
Jesus Peace be upon him was not a communist. Islam (Submission) is not communism. All previous prophets and messengers were Muslims (Submitters) to God.
28.
by azth 4y ago
Your accusing Muslims of knowing that the point of religion is something different from what the Quran says? That's quite brazen.
29.
by azth 4y ago
Why do I (or anyone) have to abide by what the UN says?
30.
by azth 4y ago
Rapists will be deterred when the punishments are actually applied.

More ›