Jerrrry

5 ms·

1.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
No one knows if the pigeon-hole principle applies absolutely exclusive to the ability to generalize outside of a training set. That is the existential, $1T question.
2.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
"Essentially" This is the #1 pedantic thing HN frequenters flail over. Turing built a limited machine, bound to a finite tape. Bravo.
3.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
The hospital, sure. Why would Wuhan center being empty represent anything? People don't rush to a random (unrelated) building when they get sick at the "market". Coincidence, surely? What are the chances of having a specializ
4.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
This is day 1 jailbreaking common sense
5.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
False, facts only need to be seen once, and one mis-step in reasoning and your CoT is derailed.
6.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
> the open-domain Frame Problem is equivalent to the Halting Problem and is therefore undecidable. Thank you, Code as Data problems are innate to the von Nuemman architecture, but I could never articulate how LLMs are so huge the
7.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
Maybe those software engineers should "lrn2code", just as the journalists, artists, and trucker drivers had to.
8.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
The hospital was full. The institute would never be full. There is no "bring your child to work day" in China. Weird conflation, unlikely... uunless you mean to muddy the waters and sow dis-information.
9.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
Lol people were getting called racist for suggesting it was anything less than the spawn of a bat and an asian water racoon. It still isn't even acceptable to acknowledge the (blatant) possibility that Omnicron was intentionally leaked
10.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
I'm guessing by not jumping into a terminating/ halting NOOP. The logic is within the branching.
11.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
Sieve the temporary backprop interim weights as a function of its loss of varentrophy relative to its place in the revalued weights. Remove the bottom weights dynamically based on the local gradient in varentrophy so that internal dissonanc
12.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
"Workflow automation" is gonna be the goalpost to beat
13.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
Fruits want to be eaten, Veggies don't.
14.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
>solve for prompt injection attacks It is essentially the same Code as Data problem as always.
15.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
Thank you, he has articulated some outcomes and signs I hadn't yet. His thesis that AI is just distilled omega-capitalism is true, very plainly.
16.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
What an exisistentally terse moment for late stage capitalism; betting State-sponsored shitcoins on our future quasi-cybernetic giga-corp overlords to offset increasingly miniscule differences in individual economic starvation.
17.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
I would suggest being careful treading that thought experiment.
18.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
Productivity went up for those still employed.
19.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
This mindset allows one to donate their intellect to society and feel immortalized. If privacy wasn't of particular concern, this is as near an "absolute good" idea as one can forge.
20.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
Collective (un)concious, yes. There is no parallel chains of unconnected thought. We are barely, rarely more than the sum of our parts on average. We have very convincing illusions of free will though - like the apparent exhibition of agenc
21.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
'Mess'-iah Complex(ity)
22.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
Fake job theory. Essentially broken window theory with humans.
23.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
URL encoding solves part of this. >Example.com/Verify/5W9GF If it fails, prompt for OTP on the fallback /Verify/ or /code/ page. Local convenience cookie for authenticating device and permi-cookie fo
24.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
The thought of using unpronounceable text to deter phishing attempts reminds me of putting illegible Unicode as challenge question answers to prevent the CSR from giving an account away to convincing social engineers.
25.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
Originality does not exist, humans are not capable of purely original thought. Closest you can get are unique sentences.
26.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
Information is now relegated by the anointed as a weapon us peons are too stupid or naive to weild. You are correct, but that just means your opinion offends the anointed, and thus is similarly buried.
27.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
>onanistic preening If this is ever used again, you're correlated.
28.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
Lol 1 outta 28 isn't a black queer mom of two. The clash of these characteristics is what defy and define these unlikely odds. This is trolling rage bait. Like most big corp content.
29.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
Its mirroring the capability (if not currently the executive agency) of being able to convince people to do things. That alone gaps the barrier as social engineering is impossible to patch - harder than full proofing models against being j
30.
by Jerrrry 2y ago
Asking characteristics about the result cause performance to drop because it's essentially asking the model to model itself implicitly/explicitly. Also the more "factoids" / clauses needed to answer accurately are i

More ›