jtbayly

7 ms·

1.
by jtbayly 4d ago
> Of course that as you get closer to C, the traveling object will experience time dilation (relative to observer), so the time passed will be less. At 99.999% C, the traveler would take ~11,000 years to arrive to Andromeda. When you say
2.
by jtbayly 6d ago
So the question becomes where does the 11k come in? It was just wrong?
3.
by jtbayly 6d ago
> “At 99.999% C, the traveler would take ~11,000 years to arrive to Andromeda.” So presumably this means 11k years from an earth point of view? But the traveler would still be alive and a very short time would have passed for him?
4.
by jtbayly 6d ago
I’m confused. Is it 11k years to the closest galaxy at the speed of light, or somehow accessible in a human lifetime?
5.
by jtbayly 7d ago
On the contrary, this is very strong steering in a prompt!
6.
by jtbayly 11d ago
Which means no sleep or HDMI yet.
7.
by jtbayly 12d ago
You are confused. Yes, lots of people say that here, but the intention is almost never to justify immoral behavior. Rather the goal is to delegitimize capitalism by blaming it for the immoral behavior.
8.
by jtbayly 14d ago
They both communicate the same thing because they both start with “buy.” They communicate Ownership and collapse to the same thing to a normal consumer: implied ownership of the game. Insisting that the ownership is of the license and it
9.
by jtbayly 14d ago
The return policies are indeed meant to be used the way you find problematic. You can buy a computer to use while yours is being repaired. Then return it. Employees will instruct you to do this.
10.
by jtbayly 15d ago
Fine, let’s take it for granted that you don’t want to all of it. But the clear implication of saying that people aren’t paying their fair share is that they generally should. So your ideal may not be 0, but it is (even by your own anal
11.
by jtbayly 15d ago
No you said, "You'll know they're paying their fair share when the arbitrage actually stops.” It might not have been intentional, but you communicated clearly that people should be charged more until they are unwilling to wor
12.
by jtbayly 16d ago
So what? You didn’t say they should pay as much as they are willing to pay. You said they should pay. They are paying! Your new goal is that nobody can afford to work in the city except residents, but that is an objectively dumb idea, and
13.
by jtbayly 16d ago
Oh, I know they are doing fine without me. lol But if you don’t like what they are doing, vote with your wallet. In this case, there actually are choices, which is nice.
14.
by jtbayly 16d ago
They already pay substantial taxes out of their income to the city they work, in most places. They already are paying for access.
15.
by jtbayly 16d ago
I canceled my subscription and moved to Apple Music
16.
by jtbayly 18d ago
It is word salad. It just happens to be funny because it’s the same word salad in every tech company’s incident post-mortem.
17.
by jtbayly 19d ago
Oh, yeah, no. I’m not providing my webpage in the EU. I’m providing it on the internet. I let people create accounts, so there might be some personal data. Depends on what the GDPR considers personal. I have no idea. Couldn’t care less. I’m
18.
by jtbayly 19d ago
Have you ever heard of Amazon? Kindle?
19.
by jtbayly 21d ago
It’s very hard to prove, yes. But you need to deal with the association with SDAM, and the differences in outcomes on the https://aphantasia.com/study/vviq .
20.
by jtbayly 21d ago
I’ve got a bunch of sites that can be viewed from (checks notes) the internet. If people in Europe don’t like that, they can block it, or choose not to visit it. In the meantime, you’ve proven exactly what I first said, which is that th
21.
by jtbayly 21d ago
They obviously don’t have a valid claim to be able to tell everyone who wants to put a website on the internet that they have to do it the EU way, which is what we’re actually talking about.
22.
by jtbayly 22d ago
That’s pretty funny to say when the EU claims GDPR applies worldwide.
23.
by jtbayly 22d ago
Makes sense. I am still getting a feel for the different levels of these processors.
24.
by jtbayly 22d ago
It’s not obvious to me. It’s somewhat surprising, even, given the specs I just looked up: M1 Max: 400 GB/s memory bandwidth, ~20.8 FP16 Tflops M4 Pro: 273 GB/s memory bandwidth ~17.2 FP16 Tflops
25.
by jtbayly 22d ago
What makes Golden Gate usable?
26.
by jtbayly 22d ago
So no matter what they do, you blame them? If they pay not enough, they are bad, if they pay enough, they are also bad. Ok.
27.
by jtbayly 22d ago
You got me curious so I looked up the previous chips[0]. Memory bandwidth M1: 68 GB/s M2: 100 GB/s (47% increase) M3: 100 GB/s (0% increase) M4: 120 GB/s (20% increase) M5: 153 GB/s (27.5% increase) So, M6: 170 GB&#
28.
by jtbayly 22d ago
Honest question: Which one feels faster?
29.
by jtbayly 23d ago
Hide My Email already uses plain old @iCloud.com as the domain. They are not changing the subdomain. There isn’t one. The announcement is they are leaving it as-is. The email addresses for sign-in with Apple do use the @private.iCloud.com
30.
by jtbayly 25d ago
I hit an advertisement in Gas Buddy that was super bright, clearly using HDR yesterday. Bummer.

More ›