9 ms·
CBP tapped into the online advertising ecosystem to track peoples’ movements
- ece 7mo agohttps://archive.md/N3BZV https://archive.md/N3BZV
- ChrisArchitect 7mo agoEarlier: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47240343 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47240343
- octoclaw 7mo ago[dead]
- giantg2 7mo agoSo they say to turn of location permissions and stuff, but what about the network carrier? Any privacy focused cell services that are reasonably priced?
- SoftTalker 7mo agoTurn off the phone entirely.
- kirth_gersen 7mo agoMost have internal batteries and are still "on" to a certain extent unless the battery is completely discharged.
- iamnothere 7mo agoUse one of the few phones with hardware kill switches or removable batteries.
- catlikesshrimp 7mo agoIf you cover your phone with an antielectrostatic bag it can't communicate; that is a Faraday cage. Since people around you will think you are also wearing a tinfoil hard, you had better stick to the phones with hardware switches as sibling comment mentions
- kube-system 7mo agoMost of those bags are total BS
- mulmen 7mo agoSeems easy to verify with an iPhone. Put it in the bag, transport the phone, look it up on Find My.
- kube-system 7mo agoEven easier, put any phone in the bag, call it. Does it ring? IME, yes.
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- SoftTalker 7mo agoIt's "on" enough to detect the activity needed to wake it back up. But will a powered-off phone still be pinging cell towers or making WiFi requests?
- mulmen 7mo agoYes, that's how Find My works.
- giantg2 7mo agoI get that anything emitting can be tracked and stuff. I'm looking to take a baby step where I'm at least not having every possible detail recorded and sold. That Phreeli recommendation from another user seems like exactly what I want (paired with other things like a VPN of course).
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- pocksuppet 7mo agoDon't think so - they're all very expensive because cell networks are expensive. You can get a burner phone, only use it as a tethered internet connection for your laptop which runs VPN software.
- iamnothere 7mo agoPhreeli seems to be the privacy promoting MVNO with the cheapest options. Not sure if it’s been audited or what its guarantees are, but anything is probably better than the big carriers.
- giantg2 7mo agoThanks! This looks like what I want
- kube-system 7mo agoCape is another option, supposedly a more complete tech stack of their own
- giantg2 7mo agoYeah, I saw them, but they are pretty expensive for me. The rotating IMSI and two additional numbers seems cool. But I think for me if it were anything that sensitive I would use an E2E encrypted call/text service since Cape calls and texts are only M2E encrypted. Just not retaining everything forever and selling it seems like a good start for my personal use.
- drnick1 7mo agoSilent.link, jmp.chat
- shevy-java 7mo agoWe can not trust many "governments". The financial incentives are just too powerful. There are cases of people becoming millionaires after they left politics. Post-retirement payback and kickbacks.
- pessimizer 7mo agoAfter they left? Try 6 months in.
- HerbManic 7mo agoYep, former prime ministers of Australia Kevin Rudd bought a house for $17 million. Do have to wonder were they got all that cash. And that is nothing exceptional, we see this in all manners of governments the world over.
- lyu07282 7mo agoIsraeli malware companies also use targeted ads to use drive-by exploits to infect people's devices using ad networks based on IP addresses: https://securitylab.amnesty.org/latest/2025/12/intellexa-leaks-predator-spyware-operations-exposed/ https://securitylab.amnesty.org/latest/2025/12/intellexa-lea... The fact that we still just allow arbitrary 3rd party code to run through ad networks is bizarre.
- Terr_ 7mo ago> The fact that we still just allow arbitrary 3rd party code to run through ad networks is bizarre. It's interesting to imagine how things would change if those ad-networks were legally liable for their role in spreading scams and malware.
- MiddleEndian 7mo agoAd networks yes. Also the website operators and application developers.
- apopapo 7mo agoTaxpayers' money used to track taxpayers and finance the advertising industry.
- iamnothere 7mo agoI can’t respond directly to octoclaw’s dead comment (edit: embarrassingly this was an LLM), but I will just say I agree, it is ridiculous both how cheap this data is and how many people aren’t aware of it. It’s not just governments who can get access, either. This is another reason why you should not be carrying a phone everywhere except for times where you absolutely need one.
- Luc 7mo agoIt is dead because it is an LLM.
- iamnothere 7mo agoWow, they are improving. None of the usual tells, fairly accurate. That’s a little concerning.
- SoftTalker 7mo agoStill has the "it's not A, but B" rhyme, if not literally the pattern. But yes they are getting better. And it's a pretty new account.
- ramoz 7mo agoFrom my experience this data is not cheap from an average consumer perspective.
- iamnothere 7mo agoNot for consumers but cheap for the people (mis)using it in bulk.
- legitster 7mo agoI work with Ad Data a lot in my job, and there's a lot of misconceptions about what this data that journalists love to propogate: The location data in these networks is very inaccurate. Your OS and browser actually do a pretty good job of locking down your location data unless you give explicit permission. It's in the ad network's interests to lie about the quality of their data - so a lot of the "location" data is going to be a vaguely accurate guess based on your IP address. But also, location data is really important to ads right now because, contrary to common perception, per user tracking is very, very hard. Each SDK might be tattling on you, but unless you give them a key to match you across apps, each signal from each app is unique. Which is why you are often served advertisements based on what other people on your network is searching - it's much easier to just blast everyone at that IP address than it is to find that specific user or device again in the data stream. Bidstream data in particular is very fraught. You're only getting the active data at the point the add is served, but it's not easy to aggregate in any way. You'll be counting the same person separately dozens or hundreds of times with different identifiers for each. The data you get from something like Mobilewalla is not useful for tracking individuals so much as it's useful for finding patterns. I think it's pretty telling from the few examples shared about how agencies actually use the data: >"CBP uses the information to “look for cellphone activity in unusual places,” including unpopulated portions of the US-Mexico border." >According to the Wall Street Journal, the IRS tried to use Venntel’s data to track individual suspects, but gave up when it couldn’t locate its targets in the company’s dataset. >In March 2021, SOCOM told Vice that the purpose of the contract was to “evaluate” the feasibility of using A6 services in an “overseas operating environment,” and that the government was no longer executing the contract Something is going to have to be figured out about this data - realistically the only way is a sunset on customized advertisements. However, I would personally not be worried (yet) that the government is going to be able to identify an individual and track them down using these public sources as they currently are.
- ducttape12 7mo agoNeither the government nor an ad agency needs to know where I am, no matter how "rough" the data is. It's none of their business.
- ramoz 7mo agoI worked closely to some of this. There were strict policies in place to never monitor US Citizens. That said i was focused in more kinetic warfare domains and not sure what would've extended past the borders by local law enforcements (DHS typically dictated no-us-soil policies). But, this is a money-hungry data pipeline of resellers and aggregators and they were always eager to sell more.
- zoklet-enjoyer 7mo agoHow do they determine if the person is a US citizen? I've sometimes wondered if my Google account is caught up in mass surveillance of non-Americans because I created my main email address while living in Australia, though I am a US citizen and only a US citizen. I haven't checked in a while, but I know that even in the US, checking my email on the web it would show that it was connecting to an Australian domain.
- ramoz 7mo agoIt was typically isolated in procurement, only buying data from "outside of the border" - data was packaged by geo regions typically
- jandrewrogers 7mo agoThere are multiple cues in the data stream that let you tag the person with a country of residence even when traveling internationally. It isn't perfect but it is likely more than adequate in most cases. The US government contracts with commercial data providers stipulate that all US data must be removed. There are quite a few regulatory controls that are adhered to.
- blurbleblurble 7mo agoI can't help but wonder how much is being spent.
- Sparkyte 7mo agoWhy we need to use pihole more aggressively.
- daft_pink 7mo agoThere’s literally a flock camera at basically every street location that one suburb borders another where I live. There’s really not any legal practical way to avoid ALPRs. I’m pretty sure the government knows where I am 24/7. I’m not going to worry about targeted advertising by the government anymore and just worry about it the people reselling it to non-governments for use.
- mulmen 7mo agoWeird take. Lots of examples recently of municipalities taking down Flock cameras. It's not a lost cause.
- daft_pink 7mo agoI think it’s possible in large cities, but seems unlikely that all small suburbs in an area you can get each suburb and some are very small to remove them. And that is just “possible” in large cities not reality. Who has the time to go from small locality to small locality.
- mulmen 7mo agoYeah you’re right, we should give up. Freedom is an impossible dream.
- orthoxerox 7mo agoThat's Scroogled (2007) by Cory Doctorow! Life imitates art, again. https://web.archive.org/web/20070920193501/http://www.radaronline.com/from-the-magazine/2007/09/google_fiction_evil_dangerous_surveillance_control_1.php https://web.archive.org/web/20070920193501/http://www.radaro...
- GaryBluto 7mo agoThanks for that. Good story.
- nine_k 7mo agoNot imitates but implements maybe.
- scroogedhard 7mo ago[dead]
- godelski 7mo agoIt's a bit crazy how much we look back at that time and what people thought was tin foil haty. But that was written in 2007, still 6 years before Snowden. 7 years before the Director of the NSA (Hayden) told Congress they kill people based on metadata. The invasion of privacy has been slow, creeping, and just waiting for that Turnkey Tyrant. We fooled ourselves into thinking we'd never elect someone who would turn that key. But in reality the key has been slowly turning, until finally it opened the latch
- surround 7mo ago> What You Can Do To Protect Yourself > 1. Disable your mobile advertising ID > 2. Review apps you’ve granted location permissions to. I'm surprised they missed the most important step, which is blocking the advertisers from collecting your data in the first place. This is easily done in the browser with uBlock Origin and system-wide with DNS filtering.
- chirau 7mo agoHow do you do the system wide DNS filtering?
- tartuffe78 7mo agopihole is one way, though it's tricky to do it right
- cdrnsf 7mo agoI have 26 apps on my phone. Of those, four are Safari extensions, one is a PWA and another I wrote myself. I use a restrictive nextDNS profile that also blocks Apple's native tracking (as best they can) and don't use social media. I feel like that's the best I can realistically do.
- azalemeth 7mo ago...and the phone itself broadcasts your position to the cell towers with remarkable accuracy, 24 hours a day.
- cdrnsf 7mo agoHence the "realistically" qualifier.
- raw_anon_1111 7mo agoAnd you do realize your cellphone is constantly sharing your location with your cell phone company which is more than willing to give it to the government without a warrant. Whatever you are doing is meaningless privacy theatre
- Computer0 7mo agoThey are probably actively providing that information. At AT&T we still are working very closely with the NSA.
- beepbooptheory 7mo agoThis makes sense to me but then why is CBP here needing/wanting to pay for ad data if they can just ask the ISPs/cell phone companies?
- tossaway0 7mo agoPaying doesn’t have the legal justification requirements that asking does, and it’s faster.
- theropost 7mo agoIt always kinda amazes me how people panic about gov data use but barely blink at the private sector doing the exact same thing… except way less transparently. Like yeah, sure, governments collecting data deserves scrutiny. 100%. But at least in most democracies there are audits, oversight bodies, privacy commissioners, courts, access to information laws, etc. There are actual mechanisms where someone can ask “why are you doing this?” and force an answer. Meanwhile we hand over our location, browsing habits, shopping patterns, sleep schedule, and probably our favorite pizza topping to dozens of private companies every day. Those companies can aggregate it, sell it, profile you, feed it into ad markets, train models with it, or ship it across borders… and most of the time nobody outside the company even knows it’s happening. So yeah, data collection in general is worth debating. But the irony is wild when people lose their minds over the one place that at least has some governance and accountability, while the entire private ad-tech ecosystem is basically “trust us bro” with a 40-page terms of service nobody reads.
- drnick1 7mo agoI am surprised the article does not mention obvious mitigation strategies, including network-wide DNS blacklists, browser ad blockers, and not using proprietary apps on phones.
- h4kunamata 7mo ago>For years, the internet advertising industry has been sucking up our data, including our location data For years, people have been sharing everything they do, what they do, people they spent time with, where they live. Advertisement industry just adds more info to complete your profile, what you buy, what you watch, what you speak online, etc.
- keybored 7mo agoPeople here complain that programmers aren’t engineers because real engineers can accidentally kill people and get sued if they mess an equation up. Instead of just breaking a build or something. I think it’s more concerning that programmers seem to have no care or shame about designing systems that works against the users’ interests. Did you share something intimate in our chat? Well it’s not E2E, moron, we have that now. How could you be this stupid? I can’t think of another profession (except pure value extraction types) which revels in exploiting people for not having the time or care to arrange their digital lives around the booby traps that nerds set for them.
- vasco 7mo agoA thief thinks everyone steals.
- hn_acc1 7mo agoAs an old-school programmer who thought computers would improve people's lives back in the 80s when I was a wide-eyed teenager.. I am constantly appalled by the current generation of SV people who are very right-leaning and are happy to steal anything and everything they can. It didn't seem like this 20 years ago when I started. I hate the advertising industry with a passion. Anecdotally, it feels like it fits right in with the "if there's no cop around to give me a ticket, I can drive however I want" attitude I've seen post-Covid. People entering two-way turn lanes or HOV merge lanes to PASS people in the main lane. People going through stop signs without any stopping while I'm waiting for my turn. Using the HOV on-ramp lane with only the driver to merge onto the freeway where it's clearly marked "24 hour HOV lane", etc. It's as if the entire social compact evaporated during/after Covid, and "everyone only out for themselves" is the norm now. Or maybe I'm just more aware of it and more cynical.
- tototrains 7mo agoDuh, what do you think we were building for the last 10 years? Does anyone with two brain cells think that corporate surveillance wasn't going to be co-opted by authoritarianism? The only people who didn't understand this were either delusional or being paid not to.
- pelotron 7mo agoWell I didn't expect the leopards to eat _my_ face.
- CodeWriter23 7mo ago[flagged]
- hsbauauvhabzb 7mo agoI’m not sure that’s fair, the majority of the American population are pretty dumb due to the poor education system. Most weren’t alive for WW2 so they’ve not come very close to an authoritarian threat in the past either.
- coliveira 7mo agoThe poor education system is correct, but that is by design.
- coliveira 7mo agoYes, some people really didn't expect that billionaires without any moral compass would do this...
- SV_BubbleTime 7mo agoI wonder how many people upset about this have ring cameras on their houses?
- hightrix 7mo agoYet another reminder that everyone everywhere should be blocking all ads all the time. I don't say that lightly as absolutes tend to not be the appropriate solution, but an absolute stance of blocking ads is appropriate.
- derwiki 7mo ago100%, this has been my soap box for years. A very easy, effective, multi-layer setup: 1. Browser adblocker 2. Pi hole running locally 3. Pi hole at your home network router level And 4, not as easy but effective, a firewall like Little Snitch Edit: the other good news is your old data loses value quickly, so starting today is still very effective: you haven’t missed the boat yet!
- Zak 7mo agoThis doesn't cover in-app adds on phones over mobile data, which is probably the main vector for the tracking discussed in the article. For that: 1. Adblocking via private DNS (e.g. https://mullvad.net/en/help/dns-over-https-and-dns-over-tls https://mullvad.net/en/help/dns-over-https-and-dns-over-tls) 2. Prefer websites over native apps wherever possible 3. Browser adblocker Hosts file adblocking is also possible on a phone where you have root.
- allthetime 7mo agoDon't use apps with ads. I can't think of a single necessary one.
- Scrounger 7mo agoThis is what I do... I use Mullvad VPN with NextDNS.io for DNS.
- dzdt 7mo agoIs this something European style privacy laws would protect against? Though given the US political situation we are far from being able to enact any kind of anti-authoritarian protections...
- refulgentis 7mo ago“Would European-style privacy laws protect against this?” is the kind of question that sounds more clarifying than it actually is, because it collapses about five separate problems into one vague gesture at “Europe.” The issue here isn’t simply “lack of privacy law.” It’s: 1. apps collecting precise location data in the first place, 2. adtech infrastructure broadcasting that data through RTB, 3. brokers aggregating and reselling it, 4. government agencies buying it to avoid the constraints that would apply if they tried to collect it directly, and 5. regulators failing to stop any of the above in a meaningful way. European law is relevant to some of that, but not as a magic shield. GDPR and ePrivacy principles are obviously more restrictive on paper than the US free-for-all, especially around consent, purpose limitation, data minimization, and downstream reuse. But “on paper” is doing a lot of work there. Europe has had years of complaints about RTB specifically, and yet the adtech ecosystem did not exactly disappear. That should tell you something. So the real answer is: yes, a stronger privacy regime can help, but no, this is not a problem that gets solved by vaguely importing “European-style privacy laws” as a concept. If the underlying business model still allows mass collection, opaque sharing, and resale of location data, then state access is a policy choice away. Governments don’t need to build a panopticon if the commercial sector already did it for them. Also, the most important legal question here is not just whether private companies should be allowed to collect/sell this data. It’s whether the government should be allowed to buy commercially available data to do an end-run around constitutional and statutory limits. That is a distinct issue. You need rules for both the commercial market and state procurement, otherwise the state just shops where the Fourth Amendment doesn’t reach. In other words, the contrast is not “Europe = protected, US = authoritarian.” The contrast is between systems that at least attempt to constrain collection and reuse, and systems that let surveillance markets mature first and ask questions later. Even in Europe, enforcement gaps, law-enforcement carveouts, and institutional incentives matter enormously. So if the goal is to understand the story, the useful question isn’t “would Europe stop this?” It’s “what combination of collection limits, resale bans, procurement bans, audit requirements, and enforcement would actually make this impossible in practice?” Anything short of that is mostly aesthetics.
- Zak 7mo agoI have never regretted my decision to aggressively block ads on every device I use, and to shun devices where I can't.
- Cider9986 7mo agoI am not sure that ad blocking is enough now or in the future as fingerprinting is extremely hard to fight while keeping a convenient web experience. Of course, continue blocking for convenience, but for privacy, more robust solutions are needed. Try to beat this: https://fingerprint.com https://fingerprint.com
- andai 7mo agoDoesn't this just identify you as "that one guy who blocks fingerprinting"? It's similar to when you use Linux or an obscure privacy-preserving browser. You've made yourself way more unique just by doing that. (I'm not sure how the math works out though, vs. actually running all that nasty tracking stuff.)
- some_furry 7mo agoThere are dozens of us! But, yeah, anti-fingerprinting is still a useful signal if less people do it. So more people should do it; especially if they're less likely to be targeted. "More haystack" makes their job harder.
- Aeglaecia 7mo agoi feel like this is the same as voting independant. it's the right idea in theory, but given the fact that 99% of people don't do it , righteousness is decreased. in this case very literally as having a unique fingerprint is entirely counter intuitive to the idea of privacy
- some_furry 7mo agoIt starts with you. Doesn't matter if others won't. You can't expect anything to chamge if you, yourself, are not willing to change.
- hn_acc1 7mo agoI run as few apps as possible, use Firefox / Ublock on my phone. I do play the odd card game (ad-supported), but only 1 or 2 times a month. I may just buy the app outright at some point. Does sharing location with family (Android) leak any data?
- inaros 7mo agoYou can also use the ecosystem for useful stuff: "Jeffrey Epstein’s Island Visitors Exposed by Data Broker" - https://www.wired.com/story/jeffrey-epstein-island-visitors-data-broker-leak/ https://www.wired.com/story/jeffrey-epstein-island-visitors-...
- vjvjvjvjghv 7mo agoI always thought these massive surveillance systems private companies are building will eventually used by governments. The Nazis, Stalin or now North Korea would be supper happy to access the data companies are accumulating aggressively.
- jmward01 7mo agoI am evolving my views on personal privacy. I am, like many people, trying to passively defend myself. However, the environment today is more akin to people coming up and punching you than it is to just avoiding door to door sales people. We are being actively attacked, and real harm is being caused. People are loosing their entire livelihoods, or worse, to attacks on their privacy like this. At the moment all I see out there is sit there and take it. Nothing I do will keep my life private in a meaningful way. The best I can hope for is that companies wont tell me too loudly that they know when I go to the bathroom and how heavy I am, they will just show me targeted ads that prove they know those things and sell my data so corrupt agencies can decide how best to abuse it, legally. So, what options are left if the only tool you are given is sit there and take it but nobody is actually defending you?
- trinsic2 7mo agoIm not sure I understand your point. You can still work to protect your privacy and it will get better slowly over time IMHO. There are services out their that help you with the data that is already out there on you.
- jmward01 7mo agoYou think privacy is getting better over time? Honestly? Is there any credible source that is documenting privacy in the US getting better?
- trinsic2 7mo agoNo its getting worse, but the more active you are about protecting your privacy the better off you are IMHO.
- 3RTB297 7mo agoWe're at a place where browser fingerprinting is what you have to defeat in order to not be tracked online, it goes a lot further than signing up for DeleteMe. All DeleteMe does is save you the time of manually making takedown requests, which is not that onerous in the first place. I've done plenty of my own. But that doesn't prevent online advertising databases from profiling me or you. And it's been happening for years - this isn't new at all. https://www.wired.com/story/how-pentagon-learned-targeted-ads-to-find-targets-and-vladimir-putin/ https://www.wired.com/story/how-pentagon-learned-targeted-ad...
- kyleee 7mo agoJust another confirmation that everyone should be blocking ads as aggressively as humanly (and AI-ly) as possible
- xannabxlle 7mo ago[flagged]
- hahajk 7mo agoIt's unfortunate the Privacy Act included an exception for law enforcement. I imagine at the time it wasn't clear that every action taken by the govt would be called law enforcement. There is an ethical framework for handling personal data collected and maintained by the US govt called the Fair Information Practice Principles (https://www.fpc.gov/resources/fipps/ https://www.fpc.gov/resources/fipps/). It really is too bad that "any legal purpose" is the stated boundary for our elected govt rather than a more noble appeal to public service.
- throwaway85825 7mo agoLaws aren't the problem here. If the data exists it will be abused, if not by the government then by corrupt insiders.
- jonhohle 7mo agoReminds me of a farmer who found a snake one winter.
- ornornor 7mo agoPSA: Firefox + uBlock origin (uBO is neutered in chromium and chrome now), along with NextDNS for your other devices blocks the vast majority of ads everywhere.
- notepad0x90 7mo agoIf you build it, they'll come.
- _slih 7mo agothe whole point of buying ad-tech data is that purchasing doesn't have the legal requirements that collecting does
- 3RTB297 7mo agoA week after I started doing OSINT research, I realized how much very personal data I had online. Much more than I wanted. Years ago I went down the privacy rabbit hole and realized how bad all of this was. And that was before it took off around 2019 and really ramped up a year ago. It's not uncommon, but always disappointing to me, to see how out of touch most HN folks are when it comes to privacy and data. Usually privacy is dismissed as hyperbole, or tinfoil hat stuff, or only for people selling drugs on the darknet. It's not anymore. The minimum barrier to entry for simply not having your every thought and whim and search catalogued is high: Masking your IP address, masking your browser fingerprint, and simply not participating in a lot of parts of the internet. These are your thoughts, your personal life, being dissected and catalogued and sold in an attempt to, at BEST, shape your behavior. At worst, see exactly when you cross the line into becoming "an agitator." It's the step you need before getting to "thoughtcrime." Why is this acceptable to anyone??? In exchange for free email? We're all in the pot and the water is already starting to bubble. And I'm sure that the only replies I might get will be "Oh, but no, it's not anything like that." Sure. This is simply the first time you're seeing it on US soil. https://www.wired.com/story/how-pentagon-learned-targeted-ads-to-find-targets-and-vladimir-putin/ https://www.wired.com/story/how-pentagon-learned-targeted-ad... Yet two years ago, look how many people were incredulous, doubtful, or simply didn't care. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39540738 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39540738 Maybe now is a good time to bring up KOSA? Or maybe we should discuss that two years from now when it's too late to change anything. https://www.eff.org/document/kids-online-safety-act-kosa https://www.eff.org/document/kids-online-safety-act-kosa https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/05/kids-online-safety-act-will-make-internet-worse-everyone https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/05/kids-online-safety-act...
- evolighting 7mo agoprivacy data it self is merely the case; The real problem is that tech giants only need to claim that their use of data is appropriate, and they can then feel free to use it to provide "better" services. After all, they should never have been allowed to do this from the very beginning. Users aren't fools—they can learn too. So what we need isn't automatic push, but easier ways to actively seek things out.
- pothamk 7mo ago[flagged]
- tdeck 7mo agoIs it just me or is this an AI comment?
- rolandog 6mo agoHonest question, wouldn't the Ad Topics proposal by Google have shifted away from all this data being leaked during bids? IIRC, advertisers would've received something like 4 words to specify your interests. Maybe I'm misremembering.
- Stancyhd8 6mo agoI suspected my husband of cheating on me, and I reached Henryclarkethicalhacker at g mail com , and he helped me discover the truth. I could monitor his phone remotely without touching it, making the process easier and less time-consuming. The step-by-step guide was also very helpful, showing me exactly what I needed to do
- matrixo 6mo agoThe comments from this account seem to be the same: out of context advertisements for this 'service'...