gruez

8 ms·

1.
by gruez 3d ago
>If they called 911 because they were worried about privacy when publically installing a privacy-violating tool, then yes, they 100% should be. Seems like the installer was calling because he thought he was being harassed? >As Keefe b
2.
by gruez 3d ago
I'm well aware of the guidelines. The point isn't to actually accuse OP of being a sockpuppet, it's to point out the hypocrisy. That's why specifically enclosed the accusation with "uncharitably: ...".
3.
by gruez 3d ago
>look at all the high rep accounts that immediately defend it As opposed to all the new accounts (uncharitably: sockpuppet accounts) that are criticizing it?
4.
by gruez 3d ago
>The response is stronger because your hairdressers and baristas aren't actively providing a service for surveillance as part of their work. Should other law enforcement contractors also be subject to the same higher standard? For i
5.
by gruez 3d ago
>Single stage hvac systems tend to have better performance in the max capacity cooling cases (Texas) and last significantly longer than units that rely on non-linear electronic devices. Why?
6.
by gruez 4d ago
From the same site: https://withspecific.com/company-data
7.
by gruez 4d ago
>If they don’t use the microphones why do they have a statement in their Terms of Service to not say sensitive things in front of your TV? Other people have mentioned there's other voice features like diction/voice control, so
8.
by gruez 4d ago
>Would you rather have one random stranger see you naked, or have a video of you naked passed around to every cop in your city? Half the ubers I've been now has a "you're being recorded" notice. Public transit is far
9.
by gruez 4d ago
I agree with the conclusion, but the whole article is obviously AI slop.
10.
by gruez 4d ago
>LG is contradicting themselves here. In order to detect a wake word then they must be collecting or recording ambient conversations. No, it's arguably accurate because "record" implies it's being persisted. Otherwise
11.
by gruez 4d ago
>also fucks self-checkout. are we so poverty stricken as a society now that we can't afford to pay cashiers? Yeah, I'm appalled how poor as a society we've become, now that we can't afford door men (outside of luxury
12.
by gruez 4d ago
>Sure, but the Waymo is taking intrusive video of much more than the inside of the car. The alternative is having a driver in the car, which is equally intrusive.
13.
by gruez 4d ago
1. there's still personal cars. 2. this is hardly a waymo/autonomous car/big tech thing. covid came with "vaccine passports" in some jurisdictions. there's no reason why it couldn't be enforced by human ta
14.
by gruez 5d ago
>it's hard to argue they were unaware of the risk. So what does it mean for an owner of a german sheppard, who specifically got it because they want a ferocious dog that can bite intruders, then it turned out it bit the mailman? Sho
15.
by gruez 5d ago
>I don't think you or I would get the same leniency if a bot on our network did the same. Well yeah, because if you coded a bot, realistically the two options are: 1) bot that crawls random sites/computers 2) bot that crawls ra
16.
by gruez 5d ago
Because "attack" implies intent. Accidentally break a window? You might be on the hook to fix it, but you're not going to jail. Break the same window at 3am, while carrying a duffel bag and other burglary tools? Well that&#x2
17.
by gruez 5d ago
Right, because in that case you'd have a hard time convincing the court that the access wasn't intentional. You might not know the law existed, but you intended to access the system. You'd have a pretty solid defense if you r
18.
by gruez 5d ago
Yes, that's actually how it works: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mens_rea
19.
by gruez 5d ago
You read your own source? >having knowingly accessed [...] >intentionally accesses a computer without authorization [...]
20.
by gruez 5d ago
No harm, no foul. Dog owners are on the hook for damages resulting from their dogs, but there must be some damage in the first place. If the dog gets loose and goes in your fenced backyard, disregarding your "no trespassing" sign,
21.
by gruez 5d ago
And...? The CPI is a weighted basket. Gas costing 2x (or whatever) doesn't mean CPI is 2x. Is that hard of a concept to grasp?
22.
by gruez 5d ago
Calling them a "hyperscaler" is a stretch. By all accounts it's some renewables startup that's trying to pivot into AI because obviously AI = $$$, and calling themselves a "hyperscaler" in the process. Calling
23.
by gruez 5d ago
Because the major labs are stenographically marking their text outputs, similar to how image outputs are already wateremarked.
24.
by gruez 5d ago
>the reported CPI of 2.4%, which of course is nowhere near the actual increase in life's necessities but does show that you can get TVs cheap I went through the CPI basket[1] and vaguely looked for categories "life's neces
25.
by gruez 5d ago
>also why hyperscalers are paying folks to host gpu clusters in their homes Source? There's definitely shady people paying people to host proxies, but hyperscalers doing it would be surprising.
26.
by gruez 5d ago
"mfg"? They don't manufacture anything.
27.
by gruez 5d ago
>Changing jobs can be rough or maybe even impossible in this job market. Wasn't there a 6 month severance on offer?
28.
by gruez 5d ago
>This was the desired effect though, as higher oil prices means more profit for US based oil producers. I'm sure that will trickle down any time now. That's giving the Trump administration too much credit. Before the war there
29.
by gruez 6d ago
Yeah, what even is the point of a "chronometer" (you don't have a clock elsewhere?), "data stream" (???), "radar visualization" (???), "depth field" (???)
30.
by gruez 6d ago
Original reddit post, since TFA didn't even bother linking to it: https://www.reddit.com/r/GalaxyFold/comments/1wcacld/tried_t...

More ›