6 ms·
What is going to become of life for those of us who do not work at AI labs and are unlikely to be hired by AI labs, despite all the years we put into learning c
by Chinjut 13d ago
What is going to become of life for those of us who do not work at AI labs and are unlikely to be hired by AI labs, despite all the years we put into learning coding, math, etc, as we were told to do? Those of us who made the mistake of studying anything other than machine learning. How will we make a living? (We don't live in a world that seems likely to distribute gains widely instead of largely to the handful of already mega-rich.)
- Yajirobe 13d agoAGI-level model is perpetually 18 months away. Your job will be fine.
- worldsavior 13d agoSo what will happen in 18 months?
- Kkoala 13d agoAGI-level model will be 18 months away in 18 months. (Well, at least according to the commenter above you)
- weakfish 13d agoThe AGI goal posts move
- Keyframe 13d agoWe fight the war, of course.
- mawadev 13d agoI wish something would finally happen, because I'm really tired of pretending I care about this stuff at work at this point
- neta1337 13d agoNothing ever happens. You'll still jot down Java endpoint
- avgDev 13d agoWe fight the clankers.
- andriy_koval 13d ago> AGI-level model is perpetually 18 months away. Your job will be fine. job depends on how CEO feeling about cutting NN% of headcount because of AI advancement
- gavinray 13d ago> How will we make a living? Swap to a career path that requires physical automation, since we're still about 10-20 years out on that front. My backup plan is being a personal trainer.
- Rover222 13d agoI'd say 5 to 10 years instead of 10 to 20, but... we'll see
- conradfr 13d agoMy new AI personal trainer app will be cheaper than you /s
- quaunaut 13d agoIs that 10-20 years number based on anything? I genuinely have no idea, but when I saw a video showing what's happening at the World Humanoid Robot Games[1], I realized I didn't have a good idea of where we really are with robotics.
- ckdot 13d ago10-20 years? I doubt it. There are a bunch of companies actively working in bringing AI into robots, so they can make your dishes. And so far progress looks quite good. Also, if enough people are going for the same backup plan it might not work out. Why should anyone book you as a personal trainer instead of the other 500 guys in town. And who is going to be able to afford paying you anyway?
- gavinray 13d ago> There are a bunch of companies actively working in bringing AI into robots, so they can make your dishes. I know, I'm excited to buy the first relatively affordable ones. > Also, if enough people are going for the same backup plan it might not work out. Sure, could happen. You can't really plan for the future -- we like to think we can, but the best you can do is set your goals and deal with the hand life gives you along the way. > Why should anyone book you as a personal trainer instead of the other 500 guys in town. I'm not particularly worried about this, but that's an individual thing based on network/connections and life history that doesn't apply to everyone.
- brindidrip 13d agoLearn to fish.
- amlib 13d agoAre you even gonna have permission to fish when the quadrillionaires own all water bodies?
- ckdot 13d agoYou can calm down, even those with machine learning knowledge and most of those working for the AI labs won’t be needed anymore if models are capable to improve themselves. In the end, having a machine replacing the work of a human is a good thing - in most of the cases we don’t work because of the work but to make a living. If too many people can’t make a living anymore the system is going to change. For the better or the worse.
- GPerson 13d agoI believe what happens in the aftermath of a capitalist-driven revolution is most people who were climbing the class hierarchy fall back down again and wealth inequality increases. Maybe things will improve in the future, but GP is rationally contending with the fact that most of us will lose out because of this and if we’re lucky our grandchildren will have easier lives in certain ways, but different lives than we would live.
- epestr 13d ago> If too many people can’t make a living anymore the system is going to change. They seem to have not yet come to believe the "is" part.
- Chinjut 13d agoI'd be happy to not work anymore with a strong welfare system redistributing society's gains to the leisured masses, but absolutely nothing I've seen of the direction of politics in any recent years gives me hope for this kind of situation coming about.
- tonyhart7 13d agothey would make universal basic income to everyone only because if there is no one getting paid then corporate couldn't make revenue anymore
- threethirtytwo 13d agoNo it is good for humanity, but not necessarily good for individuals who built technical foundational skills on things that will be taken over by automation. AI as it is now and as it will be projected into the future WILL automate many skills. But not all skills. MANY MANY people will retain skills that cannot be replaced by AI. One career track that will be replaced is definetely the SWE. Or at least massively reduced in capacity if not eliminated all together.
- MrAbstract 13d agoI have exactly the same thoughts - or perhaps slightly bleaker ones - evry time I read this relentless stream of news about new model releases. I’m tired of all the enthusiastic comments about how excited everyone is about the latest benchmark results and so on. I have a strong suspicion that many of those comments are written by people who are already financially independent, have millions in stocks, and can just sit back, coast around and watch this whole spectacle unfold while using LLMs to vibe-code their next fun side projects without a shadow of anxiety about their own future. I’ll most likely be labelled a helpless doomer and downvoted into oblivion for saying this, but I genuinely struggle to see any silver lining here.
- demirbey05 13d agoYes same thoughts. I dont know anyone who are both enthusiastic about those and work for salary. If you dont have any financial concern, this is really great.
- boinkboink78912 13d ago[dead]
- richstokes 13d agoI feel the same sometimes. I don’t see how this doesn’t lead to massive job losses. The thing we spent our lives/careers learning is now worth basically nothing in comparison. AI is only going to get better and do more with less humans in the loop over time. That said, I do also relate to the "coding was never the hard part"-type arguments, and much of my day is spent on the stuff in between writing code.. but still.
- aprilthird2021 13d agoI see how it won't lead to massive job loss every day, idk. Now every idiot has a massive slop code cannon they can point at any working system and bombard it and we all have to sift through and find the nuggets and gems in the rough
- TaupeRanger 13d ago
- RSHEPP 13d agoI am going to take my 401k and open up a coffee or bike shop. If I am going to be broke, might as well enjoy what I do.
- theappsecguy 13d agowho's buying your coffee or bikes when the rest of people are broke? Neither of those is a survival necessity.
- martinpw 12d agoAre you sure that will be enjoyable? Lots of articles out there about people opening coffee shops with idyllic dreams of what it will be like, only to find the reality is a daily grind (hehe) of dealing with delayed suppliers, broken machines, absent staff. All that not-fun stuff falls on you while the customers sip their cappucinos.
- kolinko 13d agoJust learn how to use it to do your job better. It’s an interesting moment in history, people 35+ yrs old seem to be less afraid if tech because we learned that things change in the way we work. People below this age got used to fact that the work and tech doesn’t change - just because for the last 10-15 years it didn’t.
- Chinjut 13d agoI am in my forties.
- kolinko 13d agoSo you remember past changes in tech and how people dealt with those.
- AaronAPU 13d agoThe problem is it’s turtles all the way down. The AI will be able to use AIs better than a good engineer can. And it will also be able to use AIs to use AIs to use AIs better than the engineer can. The threat is that the very kernel of value you had is gone forever. There is no more differential leverage.
- kolinko 13d agoIt’s not about how many turtles are below, and not even about who made them - it’s about who’s riding them :)
- angusturner 13d agoIts turtles all the way down
- vanuatu 13d agolarge parts of ai research likely to be automated first most swes don't work in jobs where they only work on bounded measurable tasks. there will probably be more "engineers" than ever
- TacticalCoder 13d ago> How will we make a living? Don't be selfish. Think first of all the jobs that are already dead. A friend of mine she's a translator: like translating financial documents between french/english/spanish. It's over for her: she doesn't get 10% of the gigs she used to get and the 10% she gets is... Verifying AI output. Think of the artists: I'm sorry for those too, for for many it's already game over today. > How will we make a living? A friend of mine who's got his own software-consultancy SME is now advertising on LinkedIn that he'll also help your company fix the mess LLMs created. That's how you'll make a living: by learning, in addition to all you've already learned, how you work with harnesses and LLMs to be more productive, by learning what they're good at and what they suck big fat balls at.
- GPerson 13d agoWell reasoned until the end, where it gets extremely short sighted. They’re not going to be bad at anything you can do in a very short amount of time.
- Chinjut 13d agoI sympathize with those people too. I have the same concerns for them.
- aprilthird2021 13d ago> Think of the artists: I'm sorry for those too, for for many it's already game over today. No it's not??? People want human made art. Abstract artists didn't paint anything technically challenging and they sold art for millions because art is about human connection and human inventiveness, not whatever prompt you could feed into an AI. > he'll also help your company fix the mess LLMs created. Hugely valuable. I keep a list of every PR I halted which was AI generated with AI commit summaries and AI tests and no human reviewer till me. It's very easy to convince people to keep me around. AIs are smarter than ever but the people using them and putting the prompts in and not reading the output are still as dumb as before
- angusturner 13d agoPeople want human art. Probably they will want it more than ever in post AGI world.
- deleted 13d ago[deleted]
- MattDamonSpace 13d ago“As we were told to do” girl you gotta be responsible for yourself
- Chinjut 13d agoShould I go back in time and know the future?
- deleted 13d ago[deleted]
- nater5000 13d ago>as we were told to do? This is such a childish take I hear getting thrown around all the time on the internet. If you really have just been listening to whoever is telling you how to be successful, then you were always doomed to fail at some point. Like, have some self-respect and own your own life, for better or worse. >Those of us who made the mistake of studying anything other than machine learning. How will we make a living? Take it from someone who studied machine learning specifically: nobody is safe if you assume these companies are going to produce a product that will put everybody else out of business. If AI is going to take your job, then it's gonna take enough jobs that your problems will not be personal but systematic.
- Chinjut 13d agoPerhaps it was childish to listen to advice, sure. I was a child when I made my formative choices; I was a teenager in college and so on. I can't go back in time now. Yes, these problems are systematic. That is what I am saying. That doesn't make it any nicer.
- aabajian 13d agoThe answer to this is: countries with the most natural resources will build robots to farm all their food, mine all their minerals, and build all their products. It will be up to governments to enforce that outputs are equitably distributed to the populace. Countries without natural resources, or ones with corrupt governments, will continue to have serious, and likely worsening, problems. Thought experiment: If no thought workers are needed to design or engineer a Ferrari, what is needed? My answer is time and natural resources (include energy).
- flyinglizard 13d agoPeople need purpose. Workplaces provide a very structured, highly managed, perpetual treadmill of purpose. Not purpose in the "self growth" sense, but just something to keep people occupied. "The devil looks for idle hands", and with a large swath of the population* on welfare, there's a good chance he'll find plenty. [0] that said, population in developed countries is naturally declining so maybe it won't be a problem in the long term either; or maybe, with less need to work, people will be more inclined to raise other people, leading us to both more machines and more humans.
- sashank_1509 13d agoYou can cash your UBI check that Sam Promised and do poetry daily or something , welcome to our glorious future (/s).
- aprilthird2021 13d agoYou'll be fine. All these AIs still need direction, drive, and prompts. And it'll still be important to evaluate their output and correct it. And you'll be more productive and able to do more tasks quicker than usual with you helpful human expertise guiding the AI which is far more general. You're the taste and decision maker. The AI is like a really precise, fast Google, Wikipedia, codegen tool
- Revanche1367 13d agoJoin an industry where they need someone to blame when things go wrong.