TaupeRanger

6 ms·

1.
by TaupeRanger 5d ago
Pre-LLMs: anyone can generate ideas, the implementation is what matters Post-LLMs: anyone can generate implementations, the ideas are what matter
2.
by TaupeRanger 8d ago
The term "Generative UI" refers to a front-end design approach where an AI model dynamically builds a UI in real time instead of relying on static, hard-coded templates.
3.
by TaupeRanger 13d ago
Public opinion and politicians will only notice when the job losses are massive, unfortunately. Right now, unemployment rates are still stable. We can only hope they will notice before things fall off a cliff (if they do).
4.
by TaupeRanger 1mo ago
It's like YouTube "Explainer" personalities, like Hank Green and Adam Neely. They do the kind of "learning theater" that makes you feel like you're learning something when you're actually just providing vi
5.
by TaupeRanger 1mo ago
The taxi driver claim is not really supported by any evidence. There was an article going around in 2024 claiming something like "taxi drivers die at 68", but the study it referenced had all kinds of methodological problems and wa
6.
by TaupeRanger 1mo ago
It's not uncharitable, because the system doesn't actually claim to give you an extra day of notice. It would be more accurate to say: "the model can reach a given level of forecast accuracy roughly a day farther in advance&q
7.
by TaupeRanger 1mo ago
Actually it doesn't even say that - they claim to have the same "accuracy" at 3 days that older methods have at 2 days. What does that actually get you? Were the older models so much less accurate at 3 days (compared to 2) th
8.
by TaupeRanger 1mo ago
All this for a game that has 123 "Mixed" reviews on Steam? My face was twisted in cringe the entire time. Oof.
9.
by TaupeRanger 2mo ago
Very common press release/headline meme: the question in the title of the article is literally never answered (or the opposite of the headline's claim is true). This research plainly DOES NOT explain why certain mice got cancer an
10.
by TaupeRanger 2mo ago
And at least one comment references "Curtains for Zoosha"
11.
by TaupeRanger 2mo ago
Even that would be false.
12.
by TaupeRanger 2mo ago
You're right, and to me it's refreshing to see a promo video that shows how the real product works, rather than a sanitized over-produced edit that takes out all the flaws.
13.
by TaupeRanger 2mo ago
What do you mean? OpenAI has had a real-time voice model since August of last year. This is a new model with better performance.
14.
by TaupeRanger 2mo ago
Really? Are you under the impression that parrots are able to synthesize their input and create entirely new, useful outputs which they have never heard before?
15.
by TaupeRanger 2mo ago
Whether Bender intended it or not, the term has an inherently pejorative sense. "Parroting" is not really indicative of what modern LLMs do. However, when most people bring it up as a criticism of "AI in general" in 2026
16.
by TaupeRanger 3mo ago
"Use Claude" [the end]
17.
by TaupeRanger 3mo ago
How in the world did you miss such obvious sarcasm?
18.
by TaupeRanger 3mo ago
Really interesting - if I understood the article correctly, they're simulating this on conventional hardware, so in order to get the proposed benefits, it would need to be implemented in some other electronic medium.
19.
by TaupeRanger 3mo ago
Pretty sure you responded to an AI bot, looking at their comment history.
20.
by TaupeRanger 3mo ago
TLDR: "I think AirPods increase social isolation, I don't have much good evidence for it, and although I started the article by observing how many MORE Americans use AirPods, I completely contradicted myself at the end by pointing
21.
by TaupeRanger 3mo ago
"Basketball players are extremely tall." "Go tell that to the middle school travel team in my neighborhood." Why are you even making this comment? The comment you responded to was obviously talking about median wages o
22.
by TaupeRanger 3mo ago
Technical Analysis is Astrology, and Burry has predicted 17 of last the last 2 stock market crashes.
23.
by TaupeRanger 3mo ago
The word "benefit" does not apply here. The only "benefits" patients and families care about are: 1) does the patient live longer, and/or 2) does the quality of life improve in a meaningful way? Amyloid plaques are
24.
by TaupeRanger 3mo ago
Flagged. Nonsense puff piece by the university. The headline itself is beyond terrible - this is a mouse model and would need years of further successful research to be able to say that it "restores memory" in any meaningful way,
25.
by TaupeRanger 3mo ago
You are wrong. This paper very clearly does not show that it "works". The debate exists for a good reason - the very thing this paper claims to show is the exact thing the person you replied to was questioning. And that is a
26.
by TaupeRanger 3mo ago
I have had a family member die of pancreatic cancer before age 60. It is, of course, terrible beyond belief. I'm not sure what you mean by "SOP" in this context. Referencing a bio-plausible mechanism is not actually clinicall
27.
by TaupeRanger 3mo ago
They are working on getting in vivo studies going from what I remember - it's going to take a positive result in a trial on real patients to get attention - that's just how medicine works. You have to show it actually improves lon
28.
by TaupeRanger 3mo ago
Unfortunately, anecdotes are not data, and although a patient can try anything they want, there is no way to know that such dietary changes are beneficial or potentially harmful for most patients without doing a randomized controlled trial
29.
by TaupeRanger 3mo ago
For now. Progress in hardware/model efficiency is one of the threats the big AI labs face, because if LLMs become commoditized they can’t make back the billions they spent.
30.
by TaupeRanger 3mo ago
I'm not sure what this comment means - we could always kill cancer cells, and the challenge has always been "how can we ONLY kill the cancer?" We've been burning cancer, cutting cancer out, and drugging cancer cells

More ›