nater5000

6 ms·

1.
by nater5000 5d ago
Wouldn't it be better to just link to the actual blog post? https://blog.ryan.ceo/astra-makes-a-mug
2.
by nater5000 5d ago
>How will GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-6 Sol be differentiated? You literally just differentiated them in this sentence?
3.
by nater5000 5d ago
>then the Charlie Hebdo attack in Paris Not that it really matters to your point, but this happened in 2015. Seems kind of odd to include that in this list.
4.
by nater5000 6d ago
You know, if enough tech workers at Microsoft felt strongly about these ethical issues, they could influence Microsoft's decisions internally which is probably the most effective position to be in to do so. But all well, glad you can f
5.
by nater5000 6d ago
I mean, they literally tell everyone they're "spying" on their customers. They've made that very clear.
6.
by nater5000 6d ago
Nah, this is working backwards. I've seen this dynamic plenty of times before: someone gets comfortable with some workflow in a limited context, and try to force into larger, more sophisticated context where it doesn't work as wel
7.
by nater5000 6d ago
>as the consumer This is where this discrepancy occurs. AWS (etc.) aren't targeting "consumers," they're targeting enterprises. Enterprises want to use these services with minimal interference and overhead. They'
8.
by nater5000 6d ago
>it really amazes me how fearless Deepseek are Reel it in a bit, man.
9.
by nater5000 6d ago
The title kind of buries important details about the distribution of these costs and their changes. For example, Apple TV+ went from $4.99 per month to $14.99 per month, a +200% change, while YouTube Premium went from $11.99 to $15.99, a +3
10.
by nater5000 6d ago
>Good! Smaller files! You know computers have the ability to compress videos, right? >Do I really need 4k HDR to enjoy Seinfeld? No, but the difference between 480p and even 1080p is pretty significant and definitely makes the viewing
11.
by nater5000 7d ago
I hear what he's saying, and I'm not saying he's wrong (in essence), but I think Tao (like a lot of other people) are going to have to get with the program a bit. AI is going to radically change a lot of things. It's g
12.
by nater5000 7d ago
Well, yeah? I didn't think anybody seriously thought otherwise?
13.
by nater5000 7d ago
>I believe that "have to" is a little strong, no? Yeah, you don't HAVE TO do anything your employer tells you to do. And they don't HAVE TO keep you employed. That's the deal. >by remaining one of the only peo
14.
by nater5000 7d ago
I mean, even outside the context, you ought to be fired for not doing what your employer is telling you to do. Being fired for insubordination is not really "political"; it's the epitome of a performance reason. You're l
15.
by nater5000 7d ago
I definitely think there's a lot to be done with small models dedicated to specific tasks. I've always thought the REAL value is in having large models be able to easily build small models for custom tasks (which I know is kind of
16.
by nater5000 8d ago
I have "stuff" I like. I even have a wife whom I love. But you're missing the whole point if you think that's what this post is discussing. I want "stuff" that I can't buy, like being able to work with oth
17.
by nater5000 8d ago
Lol right? And the REAL irony is that this will likely just be a way to show you even MORE ads while collecting MORE data for MORE targeted advertising. If Muse could actually just show me content that I want to see and cut out all of the o
18.
by nater5000 8d ago
I mean, Google and x.AI already have stuff like this. There's plenty of other options as well. And even outside of that, I've heard the promise of "let AI book your reservations!" since before LLMs became a thing. None o
19.
by nater5000 8d ago
>there's still the problem of does this logical result actually prove the initial question that was asked? In math, the question being asked is the validity of a logical statement. That is, there is some rigorous, logical statement
20.
by nater5000 12d ago
I'm not sure if this has been identified already, but if I had to guess: these agents are so stochastic that many of them wouldn't end up following the same trajectory to end up in the same place. All it takes is one to "foll
21.
by nater5000 13d ago
The point is to inject something into the process that these AIs can't do for you. People SHOULD feel like making a useless Mario Kart clone isn't worth the effort anymore. They should, instead, be trying to figure out how to actu
22.
by nater5000 13d ago
I mean, the plan is to use these models to find and solve those gaps. That's kind of the whole pitch of these companies: they spend a TON of money upfront setting up this infrastructure, but each iteration yields a system capable of ma
23.
by nater5000 13d ago
Except the release announcement. You know, the thing the OP you're responding to is specifically pointing out?
24.
by nater5000 13d ago
>as we were told to do? This is such a childish take I hear getting thrown around all the time on the internet. If you really have just been listening to whoever is telling you how to be successful, then you were always doomed to fail at
25.
by nater5000 13d ago
I definitely agree with the sentiment of this article, give or take. I've seen it at the place a previously worked at and now the place I currently work at: everybody wants AI to make coding faster and more efficient, but nobody is wil
26.
by nater5000 13d ago
Just terrible. The author seems to conflate not caring about the inconsequential affairs of others with not caring about your own affairs. These are definitely not the same. Being an "NPC" is considered a bad thing because it is s
27.
by nater5000 13d ago
Just over the last couple of days I've found that forcing the models to use bullet points has helped a ton. I was even tempted to post something/ask around if others had any similar experiences with this.
28.
by nater5000 16d ago
First, I actually had the author of this post as my distributed systems professor back in college. He's not just a super smart dude on a technical level, but he's probably the only CS professor I've ever had who seems to appr
29.
by nater5000 16d ago
Of course, stone mason
30.
by nater5000 17d ago
I think there's two factors that are worth considering when it comes to this: First, there's an element of timeliness that simply has hard constraints. In order to perform a "proper" analysis of this situation (i.e., lit

More ›