jsprogrammer

7 ms·

61.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
At the least you could provide video recordings of your activities.
62.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
>This changed the team dynamics in a fundamental, toxic way. It engendered bitterness from them not only toward the company but to me as well, which ultimately led to all of us leaving the company for greener pastures but with lots of ba
63.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Palantir has been deployed into banks for years.
64.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Funny, I saw no man coming here.
65.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Wouldn't the world fall apart if GS bankers weren't working at 100% capacity around the clock?
66.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
A union is a group of people who unite for a particular purpose, often contract negotiation.
67.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
I'm so glad that we have a congress that makes laws specifically to protect small content creators (at the behest of the largest corporations and their lobbies).
68.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Have you seen their investor roll? Do you think they are sitting around looking for a 500m exit?
69.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Is AirBnB really in the same market as hotels? I don't think AirBnB manages any property, do they? Maybe they compete with franchises that solely license a brand?
70.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
>Paywall free, informative content? Funny; a literal opaque wall asking me to login or view offers came down over the content when I loaded it up (with no apparent way of dismissing it).
71.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
I think it means: "For every 100 issues we had to address each day 12 months ago, we only have to address 8 issues per day, today."
72.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
The cash dropped from tourists is probably worth the annoyance.
73.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
So, you were still getting a data connection, just no audio?
74.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
If you were going across browser versions/platforms, it's possible that an appropriate audio codec couldn't be negotiated...perhaps some browsers use different codecs for different network conditions? It seems unlikely, but p
75.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
There is little ambiguity. The space of happiness was divided into two mutually exclusive groups (subtractive & additive) with the listed qualities.
76.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
You can argue that they are not providing constructive feedback, but the claim was: > a person tries to add happiness to their life by taking it away from other people around them
77.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
You may want to look at why you desire to be elevated above others. To me, thinking about others is not criticism. Criticism requires communication with the other party whom is the object of your thought. Criticism was opposed to compliment
78.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
That's exactly what the post said. Maybe you can provide a different interpretation? >In subtractive, a person tries to add happiness to their life by taking it away from other people around them - putting people down, criticizin
79.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
You must follow the 52ish-step handshake protocol pretty much exactly to have any hope of reliably creating connections across OS/browser platforms. I don't think I had seen any handshake failures in the final versions of the code
80.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
You may have a very skewed perspective if you think that anyone who is giving criticism is trying to make themselves happy at others' expense.
81.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
https://github.com/blakelapierre/instantfile https://github.com/blakelapierre/instantchat Can't say whether the HEADs work or not. They currently aren't hosted live at the moment, either
82.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
I was referring to this: >The danger here is that were the government to effectively coop wikileaks itself, which you think is anti-government, it would become a brutal and effective trojan horse. The malignment is that "the governm
83.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
I've had a WebRTC app tested working under multiple OS's (Windows, Linux, Android) and browsers (Chrome, Firefox, IE, Chrome for Android). It did take more than a month to get to that point though.
84.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Do you know of a person serving a felony sentence for violating such law?
85.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
I assume the author didn't mean literal-figurative blind faith, as how would you even know to associate something with wikileaks? The "blind faith" (I'm not suggesting it exists [nor that it doesn't], as the author
86.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Sounds like a seriously repressive state. If the law were used, it could be invalidated as it is in violation of a person's right to make records of their observations and, especially, their right to publish those records.
87.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Did you read my comment? It wasn't about the piece, but the comment I responded to.
88.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
DNC is held to the standards its members enforce.
89.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
The faith in WikiLeaks isn't blind. It will only take one false publication to destroy its credibility. All that matters is whether the facts published are accurate. Maligning the source (particularly on speculation) is a pre-emptive a
90.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
The US has a prohibition on government snooping. There is no such prohibition on private intelligence gathering; in fact, the publication of such intelligence is specifically protected.

More ›