I was referring to this: >The danger here is that were the government to effectively coop wikileaks itself, which you think is anti-government, it would become

I was referring to this: >The danger here is that were the government to effectively coop wikileaks itself, which you think is anti-government, it would become a brutal and effective trojan horse. The malignment is that "the government" would somehow use wikileaks to some negative ends [sneak into our minds?!]. >The entirety of his comment You'll note that the original article doesn't even contain the word "trojan", and only mentions Wikileaks twice -- never in the context of it being co-opt'd by a government.