jsprogrammer

6 ms·

1.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Everything (written, anyway) contains an order. The comment says that you may want to treat the same things in different orders as being the same "thing". A better, in my opinion, English translation of the univalence axiom is, &q
2.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
CEO of Google emails being used in a court of law to secure a negative outcome for Google, is off-topic in a sub thread about the CEO of Google being able to edit Google emails and other data? Did Eric challenge the authenticity of the emai
3.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
HN moderators absolutely edit user content without notice or attribution. My comments are partly authored by dang, but you will not be able to tell which words are mine and which are not.
4.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
As astaloli said, the DSM is not valid. If changes in diagnoses are changing yearly...the NIMH seems completely correct in rejecting the book.
5.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Perhaps you thought that. Others saw something different.
6.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Wow, you're back and altering my content again? How is the sub thread not relevant? It was a direct, positive example of what the person I replied to claimed. At least make an actual claim, dang. Edit: and https://news.ycomb
7.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Ok, so therapy has moved from lobotomies to... As I said, therapy seems to be devoid of any real definition.
8.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
My problem with "therapy" is that the word is woefully undefined. Sticking an ice pick up a person's nose, into their brain, and just moving the pick around has been counted as therapy.
9.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Stop thinking in "types" and responses and most certainly--stop thinking that things happen for "absolutely no reason". Everything happens for a reason. Anxiety is a mental state. Until that state is resolved, the anxiet
10.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
The comment has everything to do with editing content. Schmidt was effectively convicted on the content of his emails. I don't think Schmidt was able to edit an email used in that case. It is a positive example of what the poster I res
11.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
And was supplanted with a fake news story about a fictional character?
12.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
The CEO of Google was busted by his emails for conspiring to suppress wages. WikiLeaks recently released a 2014 email[1] from Eric where he appears to conspire with the Clinton campaign/dnc to have "low paid permanent employees&qu
13.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
The article says "it just isn't done" is an institution. A good example would be, "MSNBC utterly failed to fact check 2016".
14.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
"Your" vs "reactionaries" and I'm the one engaging in ad hominem? Hilarious. I addressed exactly what is wrong.
15.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Worst? I hadn't even heard that one. We just learned about charity self dealing. For the last few decades we have been hearing about Trump's 'improprieties'.
16.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Reactionaries are trying to keep a grip on their beloved institutions. Institutions failed, as they are wont. If any course of action can lead to a crises of 'legitimacy', it was already time to break out.
17.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
If you get a comment, the "room" wasn't/isn't empty. Unless...
18.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Are you saying Capone didn't evade taxes?
19.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Not if your record is better than their's.
20.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
It was interesting enough for FB to strip down and repackage https://github.com/bodymovin/bodymovin
21.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
In the US, ex post facto laws cannot be made.
22.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
>I agree with the sentiment elsewhere in these comments that the solution isn't to completely delete your accounts (I think they can have some value when used in moderation), but rather to change the way I use them. I would hope the
23.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
I believe big bang theories rely on an initial infinitesimal.
24.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Do you have a proof of that? Could there be structures that are provably impossible to create after some time?
25.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
The title, at least, does not nullify anything. It only presents a possibility.
26.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Does everything that can happen, actually happen? I think, probably not.
27.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Where does the 't' come from? Shouldn't it be sciology/scienceology/sciencology?
28.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Couldn't this model be used to detect and alert on bad actors?
29.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
It's stated in the only english text of the "proof": >If the set of primes is ﬁnite All conclusions are true when your premise is false: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_table#Logical_implicatio...
30.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
I think the original proposition was: dumb fucks.

More ›