Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jsprogrammer
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
91.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
Personally, I think we are better off with the DNC's emails and any other communications from the peoples' leaders. >You might care to consider that The New York Times seems to be souring on email. You might be able to infer th
92.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
>As Steven Levy has observed, this sort of leak is a digital counterpart to what had been sought by the Watergate burglars by bugging the offices of the DNC — occasioned through hacking, rather than breaking and entering. Watergate thus
93.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
All of those reasons would apply to any other vehicle.
94.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
If the lander survived, it was expected to transmit. So far it seems that nothing like the expected transmission has been received.
95.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
Hit piece on fact gathering tools with meme drops. Nice one NYT. Flagged.
96.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
Do you think that as old folks exit the market, inconsistences will be further tolerated?
97.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
>be exposed to imagery that really is not going to help them be well-adjusted in life How can you judge what will 'well-adjust' someone? What does well adjusted even mean and how could viewing an image prevent someone from beco
98.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
flights.google.com has been doing it for at least a week or two already. I haven't seen it, but I hope that it also tells you 'when fares will decrease'.
99.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
It's not possible to tell everyone everything all the time. Further, everyone would be so spammed by everyone else, it's likely no one would be able to know what was going on. It has become (and assuming we are still here in the f
100.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
I'd be more troubled by time and effort spent promoting ad hominem arguments and active censorship of discussions about theories that can actually be refuted (and the seemingly bare interest in even refuting them).
101.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
You really think Altman or Graham would work with Trump in the future? (I won't be surprised if it happens either.)
102.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
Just ate it up, eh?
103.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
Networks don't remove, only copy. Congress cannot prohibit speech or press. If it has been written down or spoken, then the US Constitution provides absolute legal justification for viewing it, copying it, and discussing it, without an
104.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
>submissions were uniformly good ><list of different reasons some submissions were not good [and in one case, you would have been picked if not for this not good quality]> please. What are the chances this submission was briga
105.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
>“We do have some information about the Republican campaign,” Mr. Assange said on Fox News. “I mean, from a point of view of an investigative journalist organization like WikiLeaks, the problem with the Trump campaign is it’s actually ha
106.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
Any valid experiment would assume a prior p-value of 1 (otherwise, what are you hypothesizing?). A null hypothesis does not have a probability. It is either the case, or it isn't. Edit (response to your comment below) [speech restricte
107.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
Maybe the embassy cut him off? It's not unlikely that a person could be targeted to have communications access disrupted across multiple devices and networks.
108.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
Here's Hillary's response to a question about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSTht4G4yJs
109.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
The likely fallout of assassination is your own death. I'm not sure there is anyone who feels like Julian's death is worth their own.
110.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
Hillary said[0] that she didn't recall joking about it, but that if she did say it, it would have been a joke . [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSTht4G4yJs
111.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
P-value is not a confidence level, but a direct measure of reproducibility.
112.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
Edit time ran out: If you can't dispute it, you won't.
113.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
That is essentially the function of p-values.
114.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
There is also the blatant fact that allegations being made are exactly the behavior he voluntarily described himself engaging in.
115.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
Typical mod treatment. Can't even put up an argument.
116.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
Changing jobs doesn't reset good will and trust. When you change teams, you get to build even more good will and trust with others.
117.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
Because Donald Trump seems to call the accusations "completely fabricated". Why wouldn't you trust Donald Trump?
118.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
I'm pretty sure the last conversation I had in an office was recorded; and broadcast live.
119.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
There are many accusations that Trump engaged in the behavior he voluntarily described himself behaving in. I don't think that matters though. He is already on the record encouraging (and bragging about) coercion; it is completely anti
120.
▲
by
jsprogrammer
10y ago
I wonder what his thoughts are about Trump nonconsensually groping women? A libertarian could not support such violence/coercion. [Edit: wow, off-topic?]
More ›