gchamonlive

6 ms·

1.
by gchamonlive 4d ago
Right, and the elites can deal with it them selves, they have money. They are definitely not directly responsible for the "subterranean environments covered in art and strewn with drug paraphernalia".
2.
by gchamonlive 5d ago
Only if you think in terms of perceived raw intelligence, but self-update is a form of valuable self-improvement that could benefit current models a lot, if they could commit facts from context into their weights cheaply and reliably.
3.
by gchamonlive 5d ago
All you can really say is that negligence is corrosive to civilization, and maybe that drugs act as an amplifier of sorts for society's illnesses and qualities.
4.
by gchamonlive 5d ago
Just charge double per view, there will be pressure for competition which is sorely needed in the ads business
5.
by gchamonlive 5d ago
It's not solved, I agree. But if we pretend it is we can prepare for when it actually becomes solved, if ever, and measuring sloppiness is a worthy pursuit even if we never "solve code".
6.
Linus's Law(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points by gchamonlive 6d ago|2 comments
7.
by gchamonlive 6d ago
In software development, Linus's law is the assertion that "given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow". In the age of AI, how many eyeballs are traded when choosing generated code over community projects?
8.
by gchamonlive 7d ago
I'd love to get paid a ton of money to leave their social shitwork for good. Do they have mastodon or bluesky?
9.
by gchamonlive 7d ago
Losing in court also represents such a ridiculously small portion of the profits they amassed because of such practices that it's actually illogical not to break the law.
10.
by gchamonlive 8d ago
I don't know, I don't care about capitalism, I prefer to reserve my attention for things that could work long term and let it wither and die. Having said that, I don't subscribe to capitalist propaganda. When I say realist so
11.
by gchamonlive 8d ago
Just bear in mind people from all over the world post here, and consent is an easy word to get wrong.
12.
by gchamonlive 9d ago
What's absurd is that this doesn't void the terms by default. There should be limits to what companies can put in their ToS beyond which those terms aren't enforceable.
13.
by gchamonlive 9d ago
Standard practice to recruit and sponsor dissidents to destabilise targets from within and it's still foreign interference
14.
by gchamonlive 9d ago
> Tottenham Hotspur (...) has saved over 85 percent in licensing fees by replacing (...) VMware instance with Hewlett-Packard Enterprise’s VME. So only a matter of time until they have to migrate again.
15.
by gchamonlive 9d ago
Pihole blacklist, would it be enough to mitigate this?
16.
by gchamonlive 10d ago
You can question the methods, but the results are solid ;)
17.
by gchamonlive 10d ago
Ah... That makes total sense, I'm feeling a bit silly now
18.
by gchamonlive 10d ago
Finding it hard to connect this comment to my OC, did you mean to comment on another thread? If not could you elaborate?
19.
by gchamonlive 10d ago
Is there any need to actually download things anymore if you just want to watch them? Better to add debrid via WebDAV to the stack: virtually unlimited space, no download time if it's on cache, nothing illegal from the part of the cons
20.
by gchamonlive 10d ago
True! But at some point the rubber needs to meet the road and we haven't seen this materialize in practice, so for all intents and purposes, when we talk about realist socialism we need to account for the various forms of authoritarian
21.
by gchamonlive 10d ago
Not necessarily I think, because socialism need not be authoritarian, I don't know how, maybe in a thousand years when the society collectively reached higher levels of moral development. But my intuition is that for libertarian social
22.
by gchamonlive 10d ago
I just wish I had a less aggressive or snarky style of writing. Maybe then I'd invite people for a discussion and not for exchanging heartbreak, but we are products of our context and certainty is what's currently rewarded, not do
23.
by gchamonlive 11d ago
One thing, I meant "Anarchism is questioning authority for authority sake " that's one single thing.
24.
by gchamonlive 11d ago
So in good faith I went to dig a bit what's the holdout in our debate here, and it's because I didn't understand two separate uses of anarchism, the one that's epistemological, anarchism as anti-foundationalism, my point
25.
by gchamonlive 11d ago
Neither making up words nor shoving their definitions in people's faces will help neither of us communicate with anyone else. These types of conversations have to happen in good faith where you assume the other party isn't a mor
26.
by gchamonlive 11d ago
The irony of you pulling credentials to illustrate how right you are about anarchism tells how much you don't understand it even if you understand the definition of the word. Anarchy is negative self-referential, you can't really
27.
by gchamonlive 11d ago
Anarchism is questioning authority for authority sake. If you put yourself in the place of authority to tell other people what's anarchism you are in for a bad time. The disagreement is the key value of anarchism. The dialectical pendu
28.
by gchamonlive 11d ago
Damn I need to watch it in English, I'm from Brazil and the dubbing is stellar, but I miss all the references
29.
by gchamonlive 11d ago
That's Mike Santini from The Chair Company
30.
by gchamonlive 12d ago
I regret that wording, tbh, should have said "yeah, that's not a healthy amount of porn to consume for your own amusement"

More ›