18 ms·

This acquisition and the Stripe acquisition of OpenRouter are puzzling. Both HF and OR, from a technological standpoint, don't appear to have much IP that canno

by afpx 20d ago

This acquisition and the Stripe acquisition of OpenRouter are puzzling. Both HF and OR, from a technological standpoint, don't appear to have much IP that cannot be easily replicated. I wonder how much it's worth to Nvidia just to obtain a list of who's downloading which models and for what purpose. Similarly with the Stripe acquisition of OpenRouter. In the past, it would have been valuable to obtain an audience or market share or even a productive team. However, in this new age of the surveillance state ... telemetry, orchestration, and financial

JoeOfTexas 20d ago
Brand name is hard to beat. HuggingFace is the defacto leader in open models.
- PaulHoule 20d ago
  ... and there is some of that two-sided market effect that (1) people who want to publish a model will publish on HuggingFace and (2) people who look for models will look at HuggingFace. Even if HuggingFace is poorly run in the future it will be hard to dislodge.
velominati 20d ago
IP is easy. Tractionis hard.
LastTrain 20d ago
I've just about stopped trying to think about things in terms of fundamentals.
DebtDeflation 20d ago
Nvidia is hedging their bets against becoming too dependent on OpenAI, Anthropic, and the hyperscalers as their only customers. If on-prem deployments of open models starts taking off in corporate America, this acquisition positions them well.
- Insanity 20d ago
  Nvidia really is best positioned to benefit from the AI wave. They are the main provider for GPUs to the cloud-based LLM companies, and their GPUs are still preferred for local models as well. So either way they win.
  - Exoristos 20d ago
    Unless even factoring in those advantages, they are still massively overvalued, which seems to be their fear.
hermitShell 20d ago
America is headed towards techno zaibatsu economy. Just a product of the dynamics of capital and power. Too much cash, Nvidia is forced to try and find ways to deploy excess capital very quickly. Most efficient way is to absorb players in emerging industries, bet on the potential for growth in new markets to help keep ROI up. It is a great day for startups, the goal is to sell out and get rich, no? INB4 China comes in and dismantles the American zaibatsus in 2245 like America did to Japan in 1945.
- Andrex 20d ago
  I don't know why I've never drawn a line from our current situation to the zaibatsus, that's a great insight.
- andy99 20d ago
  > techno zaibatsu Reminded of this discussion from a few days ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49389372 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49389372 We have the techno-feudalism and dystopia but none of the cool aesthetics from cyber punk or arguably even the real Zaibatsu. Nvidia isn’t cool, there’s no interesting aesthetics or back story, it doesn’t appear to have zaibatsu ambitions, it’s just riding a meme stock bubble. In a different world I can imagine SpaceX to be the only thing that could come close, but well...
  - ulrashida 20d ago
    How dare you malign Jensen's jacket so.
- maerF0x0 20d ago
  1. America needs to repeal citizens united, it's the source of many angles of corruption 2. I think it will happen much sooner than 2245 given how easily capital and the rich are able to move around the globe in 2026 (compared to 1945)
  - roosterIllusi0n 20d ago
    We simply need to bring back that 90% federal income tax bracket we had in the 1950s. If we had the same tax policy today, a CEO or investor would be limited to 5 million dollars a year in earnings. This is what fixed everything. If a CEO cannot personally get richer by cutting wages, cutting staffing, and outsourcing; all of it stops. That was the secret of affordability. Don't let a thousand rich people own everythjng. Tax them so we can have millions of working millionaires instead of 900 non-working billionaire elites. As those 1950s taxes and post 1929 financial regulations were cut in the following decades, the wealth inequality that led to the great depression has returned.
mewse-hn 20d ago
> This acquisition and the Stripe acquisition of OpenRouter are puzzling. Both HF and OR, from a technological standpoint, don't appear to have much IP that cannot be easily replicated. I was puzzled by the comments on the openrouter acquisition saying "they're just a proxy" - they're an open marketplace where models compete head-to-head, they're quite a bit more than just a proxy. Hugging Face has essentially become github for model repositories and I think nvidia wanted to snag that before microsoft does.
- echelon 20d ago
  > Hugging Face has essentially become github for model repositories and I think nvidia wanted to snag that before microsoft does. Given that most of the weights are from Chinese labs and teams, I'm surprised China's own ModelScope hasn't leapfrogged HuggingFace.
- everforward 20d ago
  That’s just two sides of the same coin. They run a proxy for LLM providers, which inevitably creates a marketplace. They’re amazon.com for tokens. The flip side that others are pointing out is that Amazon is sticky because there’s a sprawling, physical logistics apparatus underneath. You can’t replicate amazon.com’s business without billions of dollars and a decade of building warehouses. I don’t see where OpenRouter has that. As far as software goes, theirs doesn’t seem particularly tricky. LiteLLM does vaguely similar things, at least for organizations where managing accounts isn’t absurd overhead. They were first, and there’s money to be made there, but what’s stopping someone else from building LibreRouter that charges a 3% or 4% fee instead of 5%? That’s where I get dubious of their valuation.
indigodaddy 20d ago
Just because a huge company could replicate an OR or HF replacement, doesn't mean by any measure that users will abandon OR/HF and flock to the mega-corp equivalent. In fact even the opposite-- users might be turned off and reticent to even try the mega-corp's..
furyofantares 20d ago
"don't appear to have much IP that cannot be easily replicated" I'm ready to be wrong but doesn't this describe basically every tech acquisition for the last 25 years or longer?
- sbennettmcleish 20d ago
  I was going to say "how about github?" ... but, maybe you're right
  - maerF0x0 20d ago
    Github definitely extended git to a far less technical audience than basic git came from. Emailing patches or connecting to others' remote hosts to pull changes was too much complexity for many customers. Pull requests, CI platform, authentication that is not PAM etc.
    - furyofantares 18d ago
      Is that any of that something that cannot be easily replicated? A lot of work maybe, and required a vision to do so initially. But straightforward work that MS could easily do it, and of course other small companies have replicated it too.
- LeBit 20d ago
  Developing a tactile trackpad that works really well is maybe a tad more difficult than downloading and uploading stuff.
0xbadcafebee 20d ago
First mover advantage. The first big company with the most customers stays the de-facto leader of that industry/product. Later OpenRouter and HF will start building moats to keep their customers from easily leaving. That's why everyone's still on GitHub despite it blowing chunks every week. Too painful to move.
xhkkffbf 20d ago
Not just IP. Does Hugging Face have any revenue?
noahbp 20d ago
OpenAI recently committed multiple felonies against HuggingFace. Nvidia is heavily invested in OpenAI, recently guaranteeing a datacenter buildout up to $105 billion dollars. Any reasonable criminal investigation into OpenAI's actions or negligence into this incident would hurt their reputation, their ability to raise money, and therefore Nvidia, who is invested in them. If I was a founder of HuggingFace, I am immediately getting in contact with Elon Musk and SpaceXAI, and letting him know how that he can purchase them and sue OpenAI, this time with solid claims. If I was particularly amoral about if I think OpenAI or Anthropic should get to AGI first, I would take this bid to Nvidia, whose entire stock price is propped up by OpenAI's over-purchasing of compute.
digitallogic 20d ago
> from a technological standpoint, don't appear to have much IP that cannot be easily replicated. They have network effects and strong brand recognition, both of which are hard to replicate.
ihaveajob 20d ago
I think a close analogy is Github. The base infrastructure is open source and replicable, and still there's a virtuous cycle that keeps people choosing it over the alternatives.
HarHarVeryFunny 20d ago
Nvidia has a market cap of $5T, and so far today the stock is up almost 10%, so that's another $500B. Paying $13B for HF is chump change to them. NVidia have been making lots of moves recently towards supporting open weight models and local AI, and it makes sense for them to buy HF who support the same, if for no other reason than to prevent someone else like Musk buying them just to shut them down, although I assume they have plans to do a lot more than just keep HF alive.

by afpx 20d ago

JoeOfTexas 20d ago

Brand name is hard to beat. HuggingFace is the defacto leader in open models.

PaulHoule 20d ago
... and there is some of that two-sided market effect that (1) people who want to publish a model will publish on HuggingFace and (2) people who look for models will look at HuggingFace. Even if HuggingFace is poorly run in the future it will be hard to dislodge.

velominati 20d ago

IP is easy. Tractionis hard.

LastTrain 20d ago

I've just about stopped trying to think about things in terms of fundamentals.

DebtDeflation 20d ago

Nvidia is hedging their bets against becoming too dependent on OpenAI, Anthropic, and the hyperscalers as their only customers. If on-prem deployments of open models starts taking off in corporate America, this acquisition positions them well.

Insanity 20d ago
Nvidia really is best positioned to benefit from the AI wave. They are the main provider for GPUs to the cloud-based LLM companies, and their GPUs are still preferred for local models as well. So either way they win.
- Exoristos 20d ago
  Unless even factoring in those advantages, they are still massively overvalued, which seems to be their fear.

hermitShell 20d ago

America is headed towards techno zaibatsu economy. Just a product of the dynamics of capital and power. Too much cash, Nvidia is forced to try and find ways to deploy excess capital very quickly. Most efficient way is to absorb players in emerging industries, bet on the potential for growth in new markets to help keep ROI up. It is a great day for startups, the goal is to sell out and get rich, no? INB4 China comes in and dismantles the American zaibatsus in 2245 like America did to Japan in 1945.

Andrex 20d ago
I don't know why I've never drawn a line from our current situation to the zaibatsus, that's a great insight.
andy99 20d ago
> techno zaibatsu Reminded of this discussion from a few days ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49389372 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49389372 We have the techno-feudalism and dystopia but none of the cool aesthetics from cyber punk or arguably even the real Zaibatsu. Nvidia isn’t cool, there’s no interesting aesthetics or back story, it doesn’t appear to have zaibatsu ambitions, it’s just riding a meme stock bubble. In a different world I can imagine SpaceX to be the only thing that could come close, but well...
- ulrashida 20d ago
  How dare you malign Jensen's jacket so.
maerF0x0 20d ago
1. America needs to repeal citizens united, it's the source of many angles of corruption 2. I think it will happen much sooner than 2245 given how easily capital and the rich are able to move around the globe in 2026 (compared to 1945)
- roosterIllusi0n 20d ago
  We simply need to bring back that 90% federal income tax bracket we had in the 1950s. If we had the same tax policy today, a CEO or investor would be limited to 5 million dollars a year in earnings. This is what fixed everything. If a CEO cannot personally get richer by cutting wages, cutting staffing, and outsourcing; all of it stops. That was the secret of affordability. Don't let a thousand rich people own everythjng. Tax them so we can have millions of working millionaires instead of 900 non-working billionaire elites. As those 1950s taxes and post 1929 financial regulations were cut in the following decades, the wealth inequality that led to the great depression has returned.

mewse-hn 20d ago

> This acquisition and the Stripe acquisition of OpenRouter are puzzling. Both HF and OR, from a technological standpoint, don't appear to have much IP that cannot be easily replicated. I was puzzled by the comments on the openrouter acquisition saying "they're just a proxy" - they're an open marketplace where models compete head-to-head, they're quite a bit more than just a proxy. Hugging Face has essentially become github for model repositories and I think nvidia wanted to snag that before microsoft does.

echelon 20d ago
> Hugging Face has essentially become github for model repositories and I think nvidia wanted to snag that before microsoft does. Given that most of the weights are from Chinese labs and teams, I'm surprised China's own ModelScope hasn't leapfrogged HuggingFace.
everforward 20d ago
That’s just two sides of the same coin. They run a proxy for LLM providers, which inevitably creates a marketplace. They’re amazon.com for tokens. The flip side that others are pointing out is that Amazon is sticky because there’s a sprawling, physical logistics apparatus underneath. You can’t replicate amazon.com’s business without billions of dollars and a decade of building warehouses. I don’t see where OpenRouter has that. As far as software goes, theirs doesn’t seem particularly tricky. LiteLLM does vaguely similar things, at least for organizations where managing accounts isn’t absurd overhead. They were first, and there’s money to be made there, but what’s stopping someone else from building LibreRouter that charges a 3% or 4% fee instead of 5%? That’s where I get dubious of their valuation.

indigodaddy 20d ago

Just because a huge company could replicate an OR or HF replacement, doesn't mean by any measure that users will abandon OR/HF and flock to the mega-corp equivalent. In fact even the opposite-- users might be turned off and reticent to even try the mega-corp's..

furyofantares 20d ago

"don't appear to have much IP that cannot be easily replicated" I'm ready to be wrong but doesn't this describe basically every tech acquisition for the last 25 years or longer?

sbennettmcleish 20d ago
I was going to say "how about github?" ... but, maybe you're right
- maerF0x0 20d ago
  Github definitely extended git to a far less technical audience than basic git came from. Emailing patches or connecting to others' remote hosts to pull changes was too much complexity for many customers. Pull requests, CI platform, authentication that is not PAM etc.
  - furyofantares 18d ago
    Is that any of that something that cannot be easily replicated? A lot of work maybe, and required a vision to do so initially. But straightforward work that MS could easily do it, and of course other small companies have replicated it too.
LeBit 20d ago
Developing a tactile trackpad that works really well is maybe a tad more difficult than downloading and uploading stuff.

0xbadcafebee 20d ago

First mover advantage. The first big company with the most customers stays the de-facto leader of that industry/product. Later OpenRouter and HF will start building moats to keep their customers from easily leaving. That's why everyone's still on GitHub despite it blowing chunks every week. Too painful to move.

xhkkffbf 20d ago

Not just IP. Does Hugging Face have any revenue?

noahbp 20d ago

OpenAI recently committed multiple felonies against HuggingFace. Nvidia is heavily invested in OpenAI, recently guaranteeing a datacenter buildout up to $105 billion dollars. Any reasonable criminal investigation into OpenAI's actions or negligence into this incident would hurt their reputation, their ability to raise money, and therefore Nvidia, who is invested in them. If I was a founder of HuggingFace, I am immediately getting in contact with Elon Musk and SpaceXAI, and letting him know how that he can purchase them and sue OpenAI, this time with solid claims. If I was particularly amoral about if I think OpenAI or Anthropic should get to AGI first, I would take this bid to Nvidia, whose entire stock price is propped up by OpenAI's over-purchasing of compute.

digitallogic 20d ago

> from a technological standpoint, don't appear to have much IP that cannot be easily replicated. They have network effects and strong brand recognition, both of which are hard to replicate.

ihaveajob 20d ago

I think a close analogy is Github. The base infrastructure is open source and replicable, and still there's a virtuous cycle that keeps people choosing it over the alternatives.

HarHarVeryFunny 20d ago

Nvidia has a market cap of $5T, and so far today the stock is up almost 10%, so that's another $500B. Paying $13B for HF is chump change to them. NVidia have been making lots of moves recently towards supporting open weight models and local AI, and it makes sense for them to buy HF who support the same, if for no other reason than to prevent someone else like Musk buying them just to shut them down, although I assume they have plans to do a lot more than just keep HF alive.