ulrashida

5 ms·

1.
by ulrashida 20d ago
How dare you malign Jensen's jacket so.
2.
by ulrashida 3mo ago
Do your students know their feedback is AI generated? A pre-AI example from the military : course reviews and performance assessments were changes to be from a set of about 70 descriptors instead of written custom. Instructors could modify
3.
by ulrashida 4mo ago
I wonder if this will mean a resurgence of encyclopedias or other authoritative digital records that are known to be verified.
4.
by ulrashida 4mo ago
Cool. I hope this blows up in their face and is reverted in a few months. I don't need my phone book index to suddenly not be an index and force me to use a call center instead.
5.
by ulrashida 6mo ago
I wonder how visible it will be when showing final charges for an order. I'd definitely be more likely to "wait it out" when considering purchases in my cart if I can see what I expect will be a temporary levy.
6.
by ulrashida 7mo ago
So, given that Phoenix, Denver, and Vegas already have spacing similar to European nations do they see the benefits that the author is suggesting?
7.
by ulrashida 7mo ago
Amusing that the author can't stomach referring to themselves as an agent manager so they retreat back to the term "agent engineering". Please.
8.
by ulrashida 7mo ago
That was the joke: it's not easy to quit smoking.
9.
by ulrashida 7mo ago
And yet somewhere around that 6th donut it will hit and you will stop.
10.
by ulrashida 7mo ago
Professional engineers are required to consider the interests of the public in their work, have an obligation to reject unethical or harmful instructions and are regulated by their professional organization to support competency and address
11.
by ulrashida 7mo ago
Not the kindest take (and unlikely true).
12.
by ulrashida 8mo ago
Students tend to be fairly lazy, so this may simply mean another x% of the class reads the material rather than scanning in the 60 pages of reading for the assignment.
13.
by ulrashida 8mo ago
Which module introduces students to some of the ethical and environmental aspects of using GenAI?
14.
by ulrashida 8mo ago
Exactly this. Increasing prices with worsening service and feature bloat combined with questionable ethics made it an easy decision to cancel.
15.
by ulrashida 8mo ago
Australia has 6 weeks of leave at similar service levels, plus 11 public holidays. Turns out many countries have figured out how to not work themselves to death.
16.
by ulrashida 8mo ago
None of this is necessary.
17.
by ulrashida 8mo ago
It's a bit telling of your own biases that government/public housing seems to have escaped mention as "having a place" in this scenario.
18.
by ulrashida 9mo ago
Feels like people on their deathbed are allowed to express their thoughts, trite/trivial or not. When you are literally dying the last thing on your mind should be whether some blogger deems your thoughts valuable or cheap. May we all
19.
by ulrashida 9mo ago
That's a worthwhile view, but unlikely to occur. You may as well wish away casinos and alcohol while you're at it.
20.
by ulrashida 9mo ago
I was tempted to respond with an offhand comment about the size of the industry or similar, but what axe do you have to grind about PC gaming? You'd prefer folks go to the far more injurious mobile gaming space?
21.
by ulrashida 9mo ago
"We have not yet begun to truly suck."
22.
by ulrashida 9mo ago
Figures this comes from the National Design Studio ( https://ndstudio.gov/ ) which ironically also ignores the government's own advice on web standards and correct use of identifying headers. One can assume the US Tech F
23.
by ulrashida 9mo ago
It's a very good system. $20 is the right number to get you off the couch, but not so much as to cripple you. There are exceptions if you have a valid reason for not voting. The maximum fine is ~$180 so you can't simply ignore
24.
by ulrashida 9mo ago
I'm not sure if you've been following, but the current SCOTUS hasn't seemed to as concerned about upholding precedents as previous courts have.
25.
by ulrashida 9mo ago
Thanks for clarifying, I fully agree with your take. Peer review helps, particularly where reviewers are equipped and provided the time to do the role correctly. However, it is not alone a guarantor of quality. As someone proximate to acade
26.
by ulrashida 9mo ago
Unfortunately while catching false citations is useful, in my experience that's not usually the problem affecting paper quality. Far more prevalent are authors who mis-cite materials, either drawing support from citations that don&#x27
27.
by ulrashida 9mo ago
Peer review definitely does catch errors when performed by qualified individuals. I've personally flagged papers for major revisions or rejection as a result of errors in approach or misrepresentation of source material. I have peers w
28.
by ulrashida 10mo ago
Effectively the nth iteration of "those crazy kids"
29.
by ulrashida 10mo ago
Too much grass has been touched if this one hasn't permeated to you yet.
30.
by ulrashida 10mo ago
The average age for scientific contributors was 29. https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/L... Did the DOGE 20-somethings also have the benefits of supervision from PhDs in various s

More ›