vibrato2

9 ms·

1.
by vibrato2 5y ago
Kinda like ivermectin with the same mechanism
2.
by vibrato2 5y ago
Danger to whom? The adults have their vaccine and the kids aren’t susceptible
3.
by vibrato2 5y ago
This death number constantly trotted out is such misinformation. The vast majority of those people died from morbidities at exactly the age they were expected to. They admitted plenty of times that any positive test within a month of death
4.
by vibrato2 5y ago
I call bullshit. Your source doesn’t address the efficacy decrease at all. Yes, there are lasting changes from the vaccine, no that doesn’t indicate much about level of protection. I definitely would never get a flu shot with its ridiculous
5.
by vibrato2 5y ago
Except we had to change the definition of “working vaccine” to fit these new therapies. Traditionally a vaccine has to keep efficacy for a year. We haven’t got a year of data but the efficacy has dropped significantly
6.
by vibrato2 5y ago
The lack of proof of causation isn’t evidence for simple correlation.
7.
by vibrato2 5y ago
Misinformation doesn’t exist. Lies are real information.
8.
by vibrato2 5y ago
I know I'd prefer it to living under tyranny. Liberty or Death.
9.
by vibrato2 5y ago
Clothing is not permanent. Injections are.
10.
by vibrato2 5y ago
With these specific therapies: 1) Myocarditis (long term heart damage) 2) general inflammation and clot risk 3) long term risks of brand new mRNA technology For myself and other young athletes, my research leads me to understand that the va
11.
by vibrato2 5y ago
I haven't seen any serious attempt to address the concerns with the "vaccines". Only ostracism and censorship. Plus a healthy dose of disinformation about the safety and efficacy profiles of these therapies. If the science is
12.
by vibrato2 5y ago
The only disinformation I've seen about these vaccines has been from Fauci and other pro vaxxers. “You’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations.” - Joe Biden there was never a basis for this statement, making it clear d
13.
by vibrato2 5y ago
And by science we mean the profitable stuff. Like the most profitable pharma therapies ever offered. Remember when they discontinued the control groups? I thought Randomized controlled trials were the gold standard for science
14.
by vibrato2 5y ago
There’s a lot of video evidence to the contrary on your beach claim. Personally I was nearly run over by a police suv and tackled off my skateboard at noon by an officer in a major American city for violating park closure.
15.
by vibrato2 5y ago
United States federal interstate system
16.
by vibrato2 5y ago
What’d he claim that’s wrong? CDC regards as unvaccinated until 2 weeks post treatment. So any acute vaccine reaction is regarded as an unvaccinated hospitalization.
17.
by vibrato2 5y ago
When they’re using a non diagnostic test to categorize them, yes. It doesn’t count.
18.
by vibrato2 5y ago
So what? It’s asserting an analysis that the vaccine is killing people. Doctors have an obligation to report adverse events on VAERS, which they don’t actually seem to be doing very frequently as far as reactions are seen.
19.
by vibrato2 5y ago
How? There’s no data
20.
by vibrato2 5y ago
Live virus vaccines are actually a proven technology. I'd much sooner take a live virus than rushed to market mRNA technology. https://www.verywellhealth.com/what-is-a-live-virus-vaccine-...
21.
by vibrato2 5y ago
I added a source but hacker news isn’t fond of analysis or thinking in regards to political issues; it was flagged.
22.
by vibrato2 5y ago
Now apply that to long term vaccine safety. Ooh hitchens is fun when his logic goes against theistic religion. Not so enjoyed when it works against the modern religion of scientism.
23.
by vibrato2 5y ago
He’s one of the good people who can tell us the right way to do things. Never mind the 150k vaccine deaths.
24.
by vibrato2 5y ago
Or doubling the money supply in a year. Not exactly an unrelated event like a hat drop
25.
by vibrato2 5y ago
Did you miss the data point that boys are 6x more likely to be affected from the therapy than the illness?
26.
by vibrato2 5y ago
Preventing the spread of an infectious respiratory virus is a fools errand and we’ve known this forever. No amount of authoritarianism is enough to stop the spread. The mitigation efforts were always to avoid overrunning the hospitals, whic
27.
by vibrato2 5y ago
It'd be useful if you linked to them. Here's a human study referring to their safety. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043740/
28.
by vibrato2 5y ago
communities.win
29.
by vibrato2 5y ago
You compared it to crystals, which are not recognized by the scientific community for anything. As you can see from my posted study, there is a lot of evidence that ivermectin is efficacious against covid, and some that it isn’t. I suspect
30.
by vibrato2 5y ago
Except ivermectin won the 2015 Nobel prize in medicine. The minute crystals win the Nobel prize in medicine, let me know. I’ll buy a nice stock.

More ›