threeseed

5 ms·

1.
by threeseed 1y ago
More than happy to provided that HN goes back to not being political. Because you're asking people to support something that will literally take families off of food stamps and remove their healthcare.
2.
by threeseed 1y ago
So you believe that the majority of HN commenters support the Big Beautiful Bill: Adding trillions in unfunded liabilities to the US debt, kicking tens of millions off of Medicaid and food snaps, allowing the Trump administration to ignore
3.
by threeseed 1y ago
> if you lobby for a thing which does not do harm to other people The reason this is being discussed now is because of its inclusion in the Big Beautiful Bill which will kill the poorest in society by kicking millions off Medicaid and fo
4.
by threeseed 1y ago
And how does this all get paid for ? It doesn't. It massively increases the deficit and debt which in turn will have a raft of knock on consequences for the economy and the reputation of the US.
5.
by threeseed 1y ago
[flagged]
6.
by threeseed 1y ago
I assume so it can be included in the Big Beautiful Bill. And if that is the case then shame on everyone who are happy to make themselves wealthier at the expense of the poor. People are literally going to die because of the cuts to Medicai
7.
by threeseed 1y ago
So is the idea here that the tech community should support the Big Beautiful Bill ? Because that would be just typical.
8.
by threeseed 1y ago
Apple provides a battery replacement program. And you can use third parties as well which Apple now officially supports. It is just a lie to say you need a new phone.
9.
by threeseed 1y ago
Do you have some actual evidence that this is the case ? Otherwise saying it is definitively true is misleading to put it mildly.
10.
by threeseed 1y ago
You can’t judge battery life and performance off a .0 release when the priority is on delivering features with the minimum number of showstopper bugs. At least wait until the .1. It has been like this for every Apple release for over 20 yea
11.
by threeseed 1y ago
Learning requirements of a child are different from an adult. They are fine with a lossy, imperfect version of how the world works.
12.
by threeseed 1y ago
> practically everyone is better off with a laptop The majority of the world are using their phones as a computing device. And as someone with a MacBook and iPad the later is significantly more ergonomic.
13.
by threeseed 1y ago
But then you're paying far more than just using Claude web which can be used for tasks other than coding.
14.
by threeseed 1y ago
a) You still need to code sign on alternative app stores. b) All of your users are still going come through the Apple one.
15.
by threeseed 1y ago
You would still need to read and summarise the 250k words in order to validate the LLM.
16.
by threeseed 1y ago
The plural of anecdote is not data. Let's repeat this process for 100 coding examples and see how many it can complete "hands-off" especially where (a) it isn't a case of here is a spec and I need you to implement it and
17.
by threeseed 1y ago
> If an LLM produces the most interesting, insightful, thought-provoking content of the day, isn't that what the best version of HN would be reading and commenting on? Absolutely not. Would much rather take some that is boring, not
18.
by threeseed 1y ago
Routinely had every one of these issues. I find it's much better just to use Claude Web and be extremely specific about what I need it to do. And even then half the code it generates for me is riddled with errors.
19.
by threeseed 1y ago
I've had Cursor/Claude try to call rm -rf on my entire User directory before. The issue is that LLMs have no ability to organise their memory by importance. Especially as the context size gets larger. So when they are using tools
20.
by threeseed 1y ago
I can't tell any difference between Claude 3.5, 3.7 and 4 for coding. So today is the same AI I used last year. And based on current trajectory same I will use next year.
21.
by threeseed 1y ago
Learning from LLMs is akin to learning from Joe Rogan. You are getting a stylised view of a topic from an entity who lacks the deep understanding needed to be able to fully distill the information. But it is enough to gain enough knowledge
22.
by threeseed 1y ago
Is there some breakthrough in reasoning between o1 and o3 that we are all missing. And no one cares what we may have in the future. OpenAI etc already have an issue with credibility.
23.
by threeseed 1y ago
Samy Bengio is the co-author of Torch. His credentials speak for themselves.
24.
by threeseed 1y ago
> bigger models trained on bigger data with bigger reasoning posttraining and better distillation will push the horizons further and further There is no evidence this is the case. We could be in an era of diminishing returns where bigger
25.
by threeseed 1y ago
> aha! I told you they are useless You said this. Neither Apple nor the author did. The focus was specifically on LLM's reasoning capabilities not whether they are entirely useless or not. This is relevant because countless startups
26.
by threeseed 1y ago
And this may sound ridiculous/odd but you need to bring back pork-barrelling i.e. earmarks. If you allow everyone to go back to their district with something it encourages smaller, more frequent bills and better negotiation.
27.
by threeseed 1y ago
Almost certainly the easter egg found in the Trump "Big Beautiful Bill" which prevents states from enacting AI regulations also came from Musk. That way he can continue to steal from others and lock competitors out whilst being co
28.
by threeseed 1y ago
We really need LLMs for music to become more advanced. Then maybe the recording companies will start defending artist rights. Because not sure what all the other industry bodies are doing.
29.
by threeseed 1y ago
> reasoning models know when they are close to hallucinating because they are lacking context or understanding and know that they could solve this with a question You've just described AGI. If this were possible you could create an
30.
by threeseed 1y ago
No it's not. It's only illegal if you are found guilty of it. And for that to happen you need to be (a) an effective monopoly, (b) have a negative direct or indirect impact on consumers, (c) large enough for regulators to care abo

More ›