5 ms·
I can't tell any difference between Claude 3.5, 3.7 and 4 for coding. So today is the same AI I used last year. And based on current trajectory same I will use
by threeseed 1y ago
I can't tell any difference between Claude 3.5, 3.7 and 4 for coding.
So today is the same AI I used last year. And based on current trajectory same I will use next year.
- sroussey 1y agoI can tell the difference between those versions of Claude quite easily. Not 10x better each version, but each is more capable and the errors are fewer.
- assimpleaspossi 1y agoBut errors nonetheless.
- plemer 1y agoYou won’t find perfection anywhere
- th0ma5 1y agoThe imperfections of people are less imperfect than the machines.
- 8note 1y agoerrors are all over the place no matter what. the question is how predictable they are, and if they can be spotted as they show up. the best bugs are the ones that arent found for 5 years
- smcleod 1y agoThere is certainly a difference, however Anthropic did really well with 3.5 - far, far better than any other provider could do, so the steps from there been more incremental while other providers have been playing catch up (for example Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro is really their first model that's actually useful for coding in any way).