osweiller

6 ms·

1.
by osweiller 10y ago
That was fixed 7 months ago. https://trac.nginx.org/nginx/ticket/488#comment:4 (yes I realize this will be dead)
2.
by osweiller 10y ago
My comments are uncivil to uncivil discourse. I assume you've also measured this out to chris_wot, who has even stalked ancient posts of mine to drop their trolls.
3.
by osweiller 10y ago
You've clearly established that you're a troll. While I applaud your desperate fishing for partisan upvotes, hang your nonsensical queries and comments off of other people's posts. Thanks.
4.
by osweiller 10y ago
I don't disagree with this at all. The implementation was imperfect. It had the signature of political meddling (of the "we know better" type). It seemed poorly defined and inconsistent. It should have been done in a very dif
5.
by osweiller 10y ago
So no facts or counterpoint, then? And you continue to fail to grasp even the basics of my original comment, yet are scatter-commenting throughout this thread, seemingly boastful about your own misunderstandings. I'll let that speak fo
6.
by osweiller 10y ago
"That sounds like utter garbage" - this will surely be a rational discourse... "These scientists are employees of the university." - Ignoring that the relationship of university professors and so on are the result of a l
7.
by osweiller 10y ago
There is another post in this thread arguing that I'm speaking "partisan propaganda" (another a "mouthpiece of evil". How very theatrical) for my position. Which is a bit incredible given that I despised the Harper
8.
by osweiller 10y ago
The very article you're responding to mentions 3 specific examples of politically sensitive research But all three demonstrate nothing being suppressed. It points to two people who claim to have left their jobs (moved elsewhere&#x2F
9.
by osweiller 10y ago
EDIT: It is outrageous that it is impossible to discuss the facts of this without everyone immediately veering to their partisan sides. Sorry, it was "rock snot". I don't cite an article because this is really about the absen
10.
by osweiller 10y ago
This was a government worker's union issue that got absurdly bent out of proportion. The government demanded that government employees get approval for any direct communications with media, etc. This all began when a researcher serio
11.
by osweiller 10y ago
That is an interesting article, but the meat of it contradicts, in a common sense, the title. For instance, no one thinks that Apple has a big vault with hundreds of billions in it. Like all rational players, they hold most of their negotia
12.
by osweiller 10y ago
If you exclude the cash horde (edit - the zombies hired to protect the vault full of cash), Apple's P/E ratio is running at around 5 right now. IBM is 10. Microsoft is about 35 if excluding their much smaller cash pile. Apple is r
13.
by osweiller 10y ago
~5% of developers, while small compared to the whole, still encompasses about a million of the estimated 20 million developers worldwide. The other poster rightly mentioned the embedded space, and that is absolutely true (and indeed it is w
14.
by osweiller 10y ago
While C (and its love-child C++) bizarrely appears high in most synthetic programming popularity rankings, I personally doubt more than 5% of developers (if that) ply their days in it, or have more than a passing competency in it. Everyone
15.
by osweiller 10y ago
I'm unconvinced you read my comment and are instead painting me with a "disagrees with the Bitcoin community's consensus and is therefore bizarre" brush You've plied this valiant contrarian noise in virtually all
16.
by osweiller 10y ago
No one is getting upset about it and smashing keyboards. You do a disservice to your argument when that sort of caricature has to be the only alternative to your arguably gullible "prove a negative" attitude towards this. Nic doe
17.
by osweiller 10y ago
You just described exactly what I described in various other posts. How you came to the conclusion that I "don't seem to understand" can only possibly be due to some sort of zealot blindness that makes you a defender. Best ca
18.
by osweiller 10y ago
"All products" list four items, one of which is a product , three of which are services. Exactly as I already said . Give it up. Your initial comment about Mono was ridiculous and grotesquely out of context, and you've just
19.
by osweiller 10y ago
At this point I have to assume you're trolling. No one is this obtuse. Xamarin is a company, not a product Xamarin the company has a primary anchor product that is a tooling and SDK to build cross platform apps (indeed, on Xamari
20.
by osweiller 10y ago
Xamarin ( not Mono ) is a solution that seems like all win: Why bother with completely separate solutions on iOS and Android...and maybe even Blackberry and Windows Phone and... ...when there's a magic solution that covers them all. Su
21.
by osweiller 10y ago
You're talking about it like it's some stupid ORM wrapper or wonky Widget UI library. It is not. Again, this conversation is about Xamarin the mobile app studio. There is zero ambiguity in this, so it is perplexing that you ke
22.
by osweiller 10y ago
This is based upon attempting to use the products to build some solutions. The Xamarin advantage is in the cross-platform tooling (if I'm making separate code for each, why would I bother with a layer of abstraction?), but when used it
23.
by osweiller 10y ago
What does Unity have to do with Xamarin? Are you referring to the fact that Unity uses an old version of Mono, because that hardly is relevant to greenspot's comment. To their actual comment, it is extraordinarily difficult to make a q
24.
by osweiller 10y ago
"Its a well known fact that Google bought Motorola only for the patents. Google has also managed to use the patents to sue other companies including Microsoft." Really? Which suits were that? Google has never sued another company
25.
by osweiller 10y ago
If, on the other hand, you genuinely want to understand what "white male privilege" is all about, you should look at how women of racial minorities fared in your home town, or other similar towns. Such an analysis would not yiel
26.
by osweiller 10y ago
Do you think that no ... I have not assumed anyone else's privilege, or lack of privilege. I haven't made assumptions, demanding group guilt or deference, based upon a simplistic caricature or stereotype. It's not about tea
27.
by osweiller 10y ago
I'm from an Eastern Europe and my family never was rich, I had to put in a tremendous effort to even get into the industry. I grew up in a small, very blue collar town (the sort that most people never escape). We lived on social assi
28.
by osweiller 10y ago
Assuming that Valve just hasn't gotten around to closing this loophole seems remarkably charitable, if not naive. Valve is making untold millions on people gambling for items in the game itself. They're looking the other way as se
29.
by osweiller 10y ago
For the past decade plus, Intel has been their own biggest competitor. Atom processors aren't weak and built on an old process because Intel can't make them better, but rather because Intel's greatest fear is undercutting the
30.
by osweiller 10y ago
More computers are being sold than ever before. The market is absolutely saturated with computing devices. And aside from the intense competition Intel is facing, they're suffering the same issue that the GPU makers face -- I once up

More ›