malms

7 ms·

1.
by malms 7y ago
plus amy would be fired because she has no work anymore
2.
by malms 7y ago
this is nice
3.
by malms 7y ago
None of it qualify as interesting to peopple interested by phds.
4.
by malms 7y ago
You can also be coerced by the lack if money
5.
by malms 7y ago
Its not singled out. There are labor laws in general that prevent possibly consenting people to work more (at least in europe)
6.
by malms 7y ago
it's still nimby too
7.
by malms 7y ago
this is literally nimby
8.
by malms 7y ago
funny how everything you do in your life time can be forgotten and and you are labeled a crooked for the smallest amount of corruption "may the one who never sinned throw a rock at me"
9.
by malms 7y ago
Theres also the general problem of the truthness of what people write about you online .. anyone can write anything so it shoulg be at least defendable to be kept
10.
by malms 7y ago
So the law is only for google ? That make 0 sense
11.
by malms 7y ago
how is that creating such a list not serve the opposite purpose of the law ??
12.
by malms 7y ago
read the article
13.
by malms 7y ago
Python
14.
by malms 7y ago
"IBM" Next
15.
by malms 7y ago
They did it to protect themselves from patent trolls.
16.
by malms 7y ago
Yes and then you can't unsee it
17.
by malms 7y ago
> Responsibility for justice. That's one of the most stupid politically correct ideas of the modern times. Thinking descendants of perpetrators owe anything to descendant of victim fails to account that, in most cases, the victims w
18.
by malms 7y ago
providing the system on which is based a major criteria for scientist's career advancement not saying it's good, just that it's a fact
19.
by malms 7y ago
> I'm not sure why this is considered acceptable Because ads make money to all parties except the user.
20.
by malms 7y ago
I agree with you but that's none of my point. My point is just that you have to weight the cost: it provided tremendous value through the system of journals, while not really giving a "real" drawback since everyone in researc
21.
by malms 7y ago
She's a superstar now, could make money from ad or bribes with no personal risk. I would have done the same
22.
by malms 7y ago
It's not a "problem". elsevier has been creating actual value for years. It's becoming a problem now precisely because we think they are creating more problems than value. It's always the value market which dictate
23.
by malms 7y ago
> incurable medical condition which is ? seriously wondering
24.
by malms 7y ago
Read the people answering the tweet: Actually they didn't. They just hid the option
25.
by malms 7y ago
> If you believe your system is better, then you really should not have to actively participate in fighting opposing systems of belief. Forcing it through just shows that you are motivated by self interest, and not a core belief in the s
26.
by malms 7y ago
it's just your opinion
27.
by malms 7y ago
Skydiving isnt more dangerous than riding a motorbike daily. Also even though a agree with your bigger point its not really what happens here. People are just being stupid here, not even understanding they are playing with their life.
28.
by malms 7y ago
Its even more bullshit then
29.
by malms 7y ago
Does that use the real trajectories of the planets (such as give by the JPL ephemerides) or or eliptical approximations ?
30.
by malms 7y ago
you are missing the truth and goal of such an article. people here think they are a counterpower to evil actors with their keyboards. The truth doesn't matter and you are going into the sense of enabling police instead of being acting

More ›