Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lb0
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
lb0
4y ago
True. > I'm not saying the same is necessarily true of any given 'contagious' animal vaccine, but it could be. That's what I think I wanted to say.. there is a huge difference to anything self-spreading / repli
2.
▲
by
lb0
4y ago
Because when the original thing didn't work as intended (with which we were pretty sure, otherwise we'd never done it cause of the risks) then the kill switch will work 100% as intended for sure, and also have no unexpected side e
3.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
totaling 8 now .. but in the end will need another one really going down bad to stop all the sudden pro-nuclear movement here in Europe, which I can imagine only must have some astroturfing behind. But til then, blow more money into insurab
4.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
How cynical, if that was what how colonialism there and everywhere else was like, wow..
5.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
Yeahyeah, freedom over all, and everything natural is also good, right ? :D Please also reflect on the rhetorics you bring up here :D This is black and white painting, there are a lot of levels between..
6.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
> No, they should not have accepted being barred. But what if most accepted those limitations, and while personally a disaster, found it on the other hand right to follow common sense and obey rules applying to everyone for the greater c
7.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
Short term - long term we realize now it is eroding and "destryoing" it - like tech debt it is creating soil debt :)
8.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
Romantic but far off topic from what it is about here? With that, death becomes indeterministic for everybody, because unless believing that everything is predetermined, if someone will be remembered/thought off again is .. (even with
9.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
We must be looking at very different numbers - or what do you mean with regulation, requiring some safety standards? Nowhere nuclear got economic, required massive subsidies - and in the end has been driven by the need for the precious bypr
10.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
Not understanding what you are both getting at ... the situation has maybe changed now. But before, here at least, it was repeatedly underestimating the in the aftermath clearly visible exponential growth, exactly as the r factor is calcula
11.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
And that thinking is insane to me, long-term best is to have renewables and not pollute - nuclear is no alternative but just another bad with too many problems, bad economics, and waste produced.
12.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
Now we bring another very specific for that location argument, while the general new consensus for here seems to be that is the ultimate solution to the climate crisis? The rhetoric strawman is also pretty cheap...
13.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
Yes, and they as enough still others believe that you don't solve one huge problem by going back to another huge problem.
14.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
Just dig out the numbers and realize this project is as expensive and uneconomic as every other of our +50year history record before.. And as if this was the only problem and it hadn't a lot of huge others, nuclear proponents will use
15.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
> I find it problematic that the university requires any cookie consent whatsoever in the first place. Totally right, and also > If someone else is okay with the data transfer, he can opt-in if he wants to. I should not carry the burd
16.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
True .. and also you can bet that most obese people, if it would be a simple as taking a shot to get rid of that, most would likely do it at some point (similar for smokers). Also haven't heard of just infecting others with obesity..
17.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
> draconian measures really? What's the fuzz about anti vaxxers always talking about "won't stop infection" or "stop the pandemic" - 1st this is not black and white - 2nd and nowhere I have seen that these a
18.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
Which lockdowns in our hemisphere had the goal of stopping the virus? All I know about (or have been part of) never stated that goal, only goal was to break waves and avoid overload of health care systems, which most at least helped with. A
19.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
Very confusing statements, any sources? To start with one, https://twitter.com/maxplanckpress/status/146668793563865497...
20.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
I agree, its strange the different bubbles we live in, but none of my news sources didn't have the "Omicron likely weaker" headline?!
21.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
So no matter what the US does criminal against its own or international law (yeah I know, US give a fuck about Geneva conventions and also Den Haag.. another shame) - if they declared it "secret data" they can declare a foreign jo
22.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
Fines are there for good valid reason? Rarely they change behavior of companies, because fines are still peanuts compared to profit they gain by this.. so not really getting your comment.. they are relatively so small we cannot even call th
23.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
Spot on - this annoys me so much. So much, from quantum til cosmos, so much in life is not boolen / black or white. "Oh, someone got sick though he was vaccinated, vaccinations don't work" "Oh, someone got sick, and
24.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
Expert on tv explained it just yesterday.. 3 shots is actually what you need for most vaccines and is the common procedure for most if you remember.. 1st shot "warns" your immune system 2nd shot really triggers your immune system
25.
▲
Study: Tight-fitting FFP2/N95 masks drastically reduce risk of COVID19 infection
(twitter.com)
3 points
by
lb0
5y ago
|
2 comments
26.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
Most people already early convinced themselves by pure logic that masks should have an impact, still today you see this opposed here&there. Looks like a well carried out study and another data point, many influencing factors considered,
27.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
Doesn't need to be 100% - has been well modelled 85% would be enough. Also the pressure on the health care system would be much lower then - alternatively, if everyone who is unvaccinated would just sign off that he doesn't want h
28.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
> Why do 30% of people refuse to get vaccinated? (here in Aotearoa it is 5%). Something is happening, people are getting left behind, in vast numbers. Forcing them to comply is probably a cure worse than the disease - even a disease like
29.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
Those ""longterm"" fears to me are just an excuse. No vaccine (or please tell me one) ever showed any "long term" effects in that sense that bad things showed up > 3 months after the vaccination, actually al
30.
▲
by
lb0
5y ago
> Sorry, but are you saying that, now that we have fire and clothing and "whole cities in permafrost", hardly anybody really dies of cold anymore? No, but how & how many people die to cold right now will be significantly di
More ›