kreetx

6 ms·

1.
by kreetx 9d ago
But won't they be? If the public internet is overloaded with LLM agents, trying to break into systems, then all the non-secure systems will be found quickly, and taken off-line/fixed/etc. I.e, the hostile environment will for
2.
by kreetx 9d ago
A positive way to spin this is: we have a year to break in into any IT system. After that, it will be all either fixed or broken into, and all is fixed ever after. :)
3.
by kreetx 3mo ago
The topic of the demo is just .. odd : it's negative in its nature, difficult to understand (is there a message or a joke in there?), the animation isn't aesthetically pleasing either.
4.
by kreetx 5mo ago
Yup. I quite literally don't know anyone who is using Bitcoin directly to pay for everyday expenses, nor even for larger purchases. It always includes using an off-ramp and going through fiat.
5.
by kreetx 6mo ago
Thanks for the link, really interesting!
6.
by kreetx 7mo ago
I agree with you. I'll speculate no further.
7.
by kreetx 7mo ago
While I haven't used zulip recently, then a few years ago that was my experience as well.
8.
by kreetx 7mo ago
Was this vibe coded? Readme has typos and somehow reads "fast and loose".
9.
by kreetx 7mo ago
"Sounds like deliberate badge of ignorance" means that "crime rate is going up instead"?
10.
by kreetx 7mo ago
There is no logical conclusion to draw, you measure this instead.
11.
by kreetx 7mo ago
In context of current events it really doesn't. Also, perhaps the pain is deliberate as to limit the inflow? Again, vote into office people who do it the way you want and don't try to rip law apart when you're the minority.
12.
by kreetx 7mo ago
Sure. I'm simply saying that illegals in the US and German Jews aren't the same. The latter actually were citizens, most/many of them for more than one generation while the illegals in the US have recently entered. Also, US i
13.
by kreetx 7mo ago
The entire post reads like a justification to illegal immigration, no?
14.
by kreetx 7mo ago
Would you say then that effect of deporting illegals is in fact slowing down the decline?
15.
by kreetx 7mo ago
So the argument you are effectively making is that the police officer was planning to jump out of the way and this posed reasonably little health risk?
16.
by kreetx 7mo ago
Why pick on the expression when you could point out that the opposite is true? If it is, do say.
17.
by kreetx 7mo ago
They do, but also only physically.
18.
by kreetx 7mo ago
Well, the "enemy" of the protesters are the ICE officers. When drawing Nazi Germany comparisons I was pointing out that during those times people weren't whistling along German soldiers when they didn't agree to what the
19.
by kreetx 7mo ago
Jews were stripped of citizenship after 1933, so in fact they were. Quite similar to how citizens of US have European, African, etc. heritage but are still citizens.
20.
by kreetx 7mo ago
Funny, how the anti ICE crowd wants people to immigrate illegally. What about voting somebody to the office and changing the laws instead?
21.
by kreetx 7mo ago
Yup. The script that you execute should literally be the one that you read. (I.e, no downloading twice)
22.
by kreetx 7mo ago
While true, then I'd just skip installing these products and find another way. And if this is the only way and the product is important (say, brew), make an exception.
23.
by kreetx 7mo ago
Summary: legal immigration is very difficult to impossible. The solution, IMO, isn't "just enter illegally". When you're not a citizen then, quite frankly, the fact that you want to immigrate doesn't matter. It&#x
24.
by kreetx 7mo ago
If you look closely, Jews were citizens and an ethnic group. Jews also somehow weren't able protest along with the enemy while whistling. An anti-Bloomberg headline might run like this: Bloomberg wants detention centers for illegals to
25.
by kreetx 7mo ago
From what I've understood, Trump was elected to get illegals out. It also seems that the crime rate is actually going down.
26.
by kreetx 8mo ago
Planning ahead to put your own health at risk?
27.
by kreetx 8mo ago
I'd call it the presidential victory mandate . I guess he shouldn't actually do what he promised as the victory wasn't large enough? "Damned if you do, damned if you don't."
28.
by kreetx 8mo ago
Because the alledged pretext assumes being able to predict the future.
29.
by kreetx 8mo ago
When driving towards a law enforcement officer, it is you assaulting them, not the other way around. Fleeing is against the law as well. Why did the woman attempt this? Ot, if it was so dangerous, what was she doing there?
30.
by kreetx 8mo ago
Why do you say "not all warrants are the same" while them being different is immaterial? Also, why even "protest" at these events when the people targeted by ICE haven't determined to be illegal immigrants? They can

More ›