7 ms·

If you look closely, Jews were citizens and an ethnic group. Jews also somehow weren't able protest along with the enemy while whistling. An anti-Bloomberg hea

by kreetx 7mo ago

If you look closely, Jews were citizens and an ethnic group. Jews also somehow weren't able protest along with the enemy while whistling. An anti-Bloomberg headline might run like this: Bloomberg wants detention centers for illegals to be without a roof. I.e, of course the deportation process continues, real estate is needed.

saubeidl 7mo ago
Jews were not citizens. That's the oldest trick in the book, make up some dumb legalistic excuse for ones crimes against humanity. Just gate citizenship to the lilliest of whites and then put non-citizens in camps... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Laws#Classifications_under_the_laws https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Laws#Classifications...
- kreetx 7mo ago
  Jews were stripped of citizenship after 1933, so in fact they were. Quite similar to how citizens of US have European, African, etc. heritage but are still citizens.
  - saubeidl 7mo ago
    The stripping of citizenship was implemented as prerequisite for the camps. You need a plausible excuse for the camps after all, as I'm sure you're well aware.
    - kreetx 7mo ago
      Sure. I'm simply saying that illegals in the US and German Jews aren't the same. The latter actually were citizens, most/many of them for more than one generation while the illegals in the US have recently entered. Also, US illegals are simply deported, not killed. Also, acquiring real estate for any org to for any activity is also normal. E.g a town government who buys a warehouse to house a temporary school or hospital. Bloomberg is just trying to insinuate analogies here because their political party didn't win.
donkeybeer 7mo ago
Protest along with the "enemy"? What "enemy"? You seem extremely confused to the point of not even making sense anymore.
- kreetx 7mo ago
  Well, the "enemy" of the protesters are the ICE officers. When drawing Nazi Germany comparisons I was pointing out that during those times people weren't whistling along German soldiers when they didn't agree to what they were doing.
  - donkeybeer 7mo ago
    Protest "along" is a strange word then. But the main question has always been prove illegality and come with actual legal warrants and don't commit terrorist acts on random civilians, if ICE were merely following the law the protests would have been much smaller.
    - kreetx 7mo ago
      [flagged]
      - donkeybeer 7mo ago
        They are not interfering, you still don't seem to understand filming or protesting cops or engaging in any other act of free speech in public does no require permission. Out of courtesy local govt may be informed but engagement in speech is not illegal. And again you fail to understand the problem is that ICE they aren't waiting for proof before killing or jailing people. In fact in many cases they are engaging in home invasions which are clear cut illegal unless the real not karen warrant is presented. In fact Minnesota is a castle doctrine state, meaning if cornered on your own property you can quite legally shoot the invader including killing them. It's not just theoretical, it has already happened in many states.
        kreetx 7mo ago

by kreetx 7mo ago

saubeidl 7mo ago

Jews were not citizens. That's the oldest trick in the book, make up some dumb legalistic excuse for ones crimes against humanity. Just gate citizenship to the lilliest of whites and then put non-citizens in camps... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Laws#Classifications_under_the_laws https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Laws#Classifications...

kreetx 7mo ago
Jews were stripped of citizenship after 1933, so in fact they were. Quite similar to how citizens of US have European, African, etc. heritage but are still citizens.
- saubeidl 7mo ago
  The stripping of citizenship was implemented as prerequisite for the camps. You need a plausible excuse for the camps after all, as I'm sure you're well aware.
  - kreetx 7mo ago
    Sure. I'm simply saying that illegals in the US and German Jews aren't the same. The latter actually were citizens, most/many of them for more than one generation while the illegals in the US have recently entered. Also, US illegals are simply deported, not killed. Also, acquiring real estate for any org to for any activity is also normal. E.g a town government who buys a warehouse to house a temporary school or hospital. Bloomberg is just trying to insinuate analogies here because their political party didn't win.

donkeybeer 7mo ago

Protest along with the "enemy"? What "enemy"? You seem extremely confused to the point of not even making sense anymore.

kreetx 7mo ago
Well, the "enemy" of the protesters are the ICE officers. When drawing Nazi Germany comparisons I was pointing out that during those times people weren't whistling along German soldiers when they didn't agree to what they were doing.
- donkeybeer 7mo ago
  Protest "along" is a strange word then. But the main question has always been prove illegality and come with actual legal warrants and don't commit terrorist acts on random civilians, if ICE were merely following the law the protests would have been much smaller.
  - kreetx 7mo ago
    [flagged]
    - donkeybeer 7mo ago
      They are not interfering, you still don't seem to understand filming or protesting cops or engaging in any other act of free speech in public does no require permission. Out of courtesy local govt may be informed but engagement in speech is not illegal. And again you fail to understand the problem is that ICE they aren't waiting for proof before killing or jailing people. In fact in many cases they are engaging in home invasions which are clear cut illegal unless the real not karen warrant is presented. In fact Minnesota is a castle doctrine state, meaning if cornered on your own property you can quite legally shoot the invader including killing them. It's not just theoretical, it has already happened in many states.
      - kreetx 7mo ago