gljiva

14 ms·

1.
by gljiva 4mo ago
As I understand it, the last sentence stems from the fact that too large of a share of the total wealth is in the hands of those that don't benefit from more homes. AI is what's prioritised by them and what will lead to even small
2.
by gljiva 4mo ago
How dare they not solve _all_ the problems, instead of only contributing towards solving one!
3.
by gljiva 5mo ago
Well, I hope you don't have a say in that matter, not because you disagree, but because you ignored all of the reasoning behind my points, just to repeat the same. Your analogy about guns is irrelevant because all the negative aspects
4.
by gljiva 5mo ago
No. The traffic rules for trams or tram stop positions should be adjusted and people in Amsterdam should be educated to behave around trams, i.e. in traffic in general if they want fewer deaths. There are literally marks on every step of th
5.
by gljiva 5mo ago
> Right, the coup of 2014 ousted democratically elected president As I said earlier. Everything was fine while he was just "democratically" elected. And when he _started_ eroding democracy. But he took it too far going against
6.
by gljiva 5mo ago
> 2014 coup ousted democratically elected president ..whose forces killed unarmed protestors, and who abandoned the country (after the forces under his chain of command killed protestors, so he can mostly thank himself and his goons for
7.
by gljiva 5mo ago
Ah, a time-wasting Russian bot spamming "questions". https://theintercept.com/2022/03/17/russia-ukraine-bioweapon... Ukraine needed to arm itself for protecting its borders and reclaiming its territ
8.
by gljiva 5mo ago
Had? Ukraine still has the option to capitulate and give up its territory, what kind of argument is that? Separatists who take up arms are a fair target, they are the ones violently changing the status quo. When both sides kill civilians in
9.
by gljiva 5mo ago
If Russia didn't want a war there wouldn't be one. I didn't make anything. As someone living in a country with a hostile neighbour, I'm glad the governments currently continue to coexist, even if mine could get an econom
10.
by gljiva 5mo ago
I am considering the absolute impact on those affected, which is the most relevant for this discussion. Millions are not "a few". And it's absolutely unnecessary, the aggressor has always been in the position to pull back and
11.
by gljiva 5mo ago
ProgeCAD seems to be a viable alternative lately. I have heard positive reviews from a perfectionist that does _a lot_ of telecom-related projects in it after years of AutoCAD.
12.
by gljiva 5mo ago
Actually, a lot would change. Each one of the Ukrainian lives destroyed is a whole life destroyed. A damaged car is a setback for a family. There are whole cities and villages razed in Ukraine, fields polluted or rigged with explosives. Cou
13.
by gljiva 5mo ago
Freedoms are removed either way. I'd rather have everyone be _free_ to participate in traffic on safer, more observable streets, where air quality, maneuverability and parking space is decreased only for a good reason, than have a smal
14.
by gljiva 6mo ago
One should either weather out the storm or if one wants to cash out soon or manage their portfolio more closely they would pick the defensive assets they trust the most and hold until they stop thinking the stock market crash is coming up o
15.
by gljiva 6mo ago
That scene makes the movie one of the few 10/10 movies in my opinion. It's perfect for the target audience. Seeing my dad, who grew up on these actors' action flicks, laugh himself to tears when Chuck Norris appears is one of
16.
by gljiva 6mo ago
Armed resistance is legitimate as long as harm to civilians is carefully avoided. Let's not downplay it as "strategic partnerships" and "armed resistance". It is terrorism. Both sides perpetrate it.
17.
by gljiva 6mo ago
The scale of these atrocities and our governments' support are the reason why this story should be on HN. We elect people who support this, therefore it's only right it follows us and comes up often, even when it's not conven
18.
by gljiva 6mo ago
Imagine how far we are from allowing our own stances to change for the purpose of finding out the truth that would benefit us all
19.
by gljiva 7mo ago
Isn't the currently trendy term "special military operation"?
20.
by gljiva 7mo ago
Placing landmines systematically during peacetime by a stable government-ran military should at least make clearing mines easier, and minefields better marked for locals. So, it's not completely indiscriminate. If it decreases war-rela
21.
by gljiva 8mo ago
You haven't mentioned that they: a) are aware that their smoke isn't dispersed enough by the breeze / open space to be unnoticeable. b) know there is someone close enough who isn't like them and other smokers, and is rea
22.
by gljiva 1y ago
Have the families of those "insurers" made a decision to harm others?
23.
by gljiva 1y ago
On the contrary: terrorism is the way to make the west make a symbolic political gesture AGAINST you. Their terrorism looks a bit less barbaric than what Hamas did, but the scale on which it's perpetrated is much larger and the dead ba
24.
by gljiva 1y ago
Don't you have problems with the app drawer not being scrollable until the launcher's restart? The app is sadly no longer maintained
25.
by gljiva 1y ago
People whose ideas get heavily criticized for "being written by AI" (with most readers missing the point) have less influence and perhaps that influence matters enough to them to adapt, i.e. to "let others change them"
26.
by gljiva 1y ago
Do you perhaps have sources of those claims at hand?
27.
by gljiva 1y ago
Arguing about which bags are worse for the environment is a waste of time and resources, since littering is the root problem and huge fines regarding littering invested in enforcement and prosecution of such acts should be much better for t
28.
by gljiva 1y ago
Am I missing or misinterpreting something? This study's whole analysis, including comparison of toxicity in misandrist and misogynist subreddits, is based on an output of a model fine-tuned on hate speech, annotated in the following ma
29.
by gljiva 1y ago
I have a lot of ideas that answer your question, but there are three main reasons why *improving the quality of education* has the highest priority: - Improves the society in general - Having a well-educated society able to think critically
30.
by gljiva 2y ago
Did you try refreshing? Solved the problem for me.

More ›